Tag: Fairfield County School District

  • Superintendent Green announces retirement from FCSD

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County Schools Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green has announced that he will retire at some point during the next school year.

    He made the announcement Wednesday evening.

    Green

    Green has served the Fairfield County School District for 11 years. During his tenure, he guided the construction of a new career center and launched a dual enrollment for high school students that would allow them to graduate high school with an associate’s degree from Midlands Tech.

    “I’m at the point now where I have done with what I’ve been charged with doing here,” Green told WLTX-TV news.

    He said he will stay here long enough to help the district through the transition to a new superintendent. He said he is writing a book and plans to do some consulting with other districts.

  • FCSD sues bus company

    WINNSBORO – It was supposed to be a lifetime opportunity for 47 Fairfield County BETA Club students.

    Instead, recurring mechanical issues and frequent stops turned the road trip to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma into a nightmare.

    Now the Fairfield County School District is suing, accusing the bus company of “contract breaches and misrepresentations,” and also claiming the company is responsible for nearly $10,500 in additional costs the district says it incurred.

    Filed March 18, the suit names Brooks Cavaliers; Brooks Transit Charter Service, Inc.; John Brooks; Inga Brooks; Charles Brooks; and Charles Black as defendants.

    The litigation seeks actual and punitive damages, damages in accordance with the S.C. Unfair Trade Practices Act, and legal fees and expenses. A deadline of October 14 has been set to complete mediation.

    Brooks Cavaliers had not filed a response as of press time, according to the Fairfield County Public Index.

    A representative of Brooks Cavaliers said the company has responded to the suit, but he did not comment further and the call ended.

    Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green and board chairman William Frick also couldn’t be reached.

    Deputy Superintendent Dr. Claudia Avery signed the initial contract with Brooks Transit on March 29, 2019, according to documents filed with the suit.

    At the April 9, 2019 board meeting, the district’s Board of Trustees approved the Oklahoma excursion as a field trip request at a cost of $45,024.60. The purpose of the trip was so students in grades 4-8 could travel to the National Beta Club Convention “to compete in various academic competitions and present their visual artwork and projects,” district financial documents state.

    Invoices filed with the lawsuit state the district spent an additional $8,212 to charter with a second bus company to complete the trip after the original bus broke down, stranding students and chaperones.

    The district spent $2,267.47 more in additional hotel room costs, driving the total cost of the trip to at least $55,504.07. Forty-seven students and 14 chaperones went on the trip.

    According to the lawsuit, the Brooks Cavaliers buses stopped virtually every hour the first night of the trip, sometimes for drivers to take restroom breaks or to sleep; other times for various mechanical problems.

    “The drivers did not offer any explanation for many of the unscheduled stops and, when asked, spoke in a very rude manner to the chaperones of the trip,” the suit states. “Many of the stops occurred on the side of the highway for a lengthy amount of time, creating risks of accidents.”

    At one point, a bus leaked oil on the property of a hotel, which complained about the leak. Mechanical problems persisted in Oklahoma and on the return trip, including at a truck stop in Oklahoma, where students and chaperones were marooned for five hours, according to the suit.

    “After a lengthy wait, one of the chaperones telephoned a school district administrator to report the ongoing concerns and the fact that they had been stranded at a truck stop in Oklahoma for several hours,” the suit stated. “District administration attempted to contact Brooks Cavaliers unsuccessfully to try to resolve this issue. The District administrator eventually reached Ms. Inga Brooks and explained the seriousness of the matter.”

    It was at this point, the suit continues, that the district hired a second charter bus company to drive everyone home.

  • Dr. J.R. Green named Super of Year

    COLUMBIA – Fairfield County School District Superintendent, Dr. J.R. Green, has been named the 2021 South Carolina Superintendent of the Year by the South Carolina Association of School Administrators (SCASA).

    “I have had the pleasure of working with Dr. Green as a school board member and as a parent,” said Fairfield County School Board Chair William Frick. “Dr. Green talked about having a ‘culture change’ in the Fairfield County School District…Our students graduate with two years of college as they graduate from high school, overall test scores are improving, and financially we are operating with a balanced budget.” Mr. Frick continued, “While he did not accomplish any of these things on his own, none of it would have happened without Dr. J.R. Green and a culture change.”

    Dr. Green is an active member of the SCASA Superintendents’ Affiliate, and he currently serves as a member of the South Carolina State Board of Education. His school district is home to 2,600 students; in which nearly 90% of the students qualify for free or reduced-price meals.

    Elizabeth “Beth” A. Phibbs, Executive Director of SCASA, states, “Dr. Green has been and continues to be a stabilizing force in the Fairfield County School District. Under his leadership, the district has expanded and strengthened programs and opportunities for their students. By working closely with the community, he has established partnerships which directly benefit the students of Fairfield County, and we are delighted to honor him as the 2021 South Carolina Superintendent of the Year.”

    Finalists for the award included Dr. William “Bill” James, Lexington School District Two and Dr. Neil Vincent, Florence School District Two. Candidates participated in an application and interview process conducted by a team of South Carolina business, education, and community leaders.

  • District charges $338 for FOIA records

    WINNSBORO – It will cost $338 before the Fairfield County School District will disclose expense records from the superintendent’s discretionary budget, which one board member characterized as a sort of ‘slush fund.’

    It’s from the superintendent’s account, also referred to as the superintendent’s contingency fund, that the district quietly paid for costly, out-of-state trips for the Griffin Bow Tie Club.

    Exactly how much is spent on the student groups and other things remains a mystery.

    In a letter to The Voice, Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green said the newspaper would have to pay an $84.50 deposit before the district would even process the request.

    “This District will provide you with copies of the requested information upon receipt of an appropriate deposit, as authorized by the FOIA,” Green wrote on Oct. 21. “Upon receipt of the deposit, the District will undertake the work necessary to respond to your request.”

    Green’s response came 10 business days after The Voice’s request, the maximum allowed under state law.

    The Voice contested the $338 charge in a reply sent Oct. 27, noting that state law allows public bodies to waive or reduce fees when “the agency determines that waiver or reduction of the fee is in the public interest because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefitting the general public.”

    The district took another 10 business days to respond to The Voice’s reply, saying it would not reconsider the $338 fee.

    Jay Bender, an attorney with the S.C. Press Association, of which The Voice is a member, said when public bodies slow walk public record requests, they’re sending a message that they want taxpayers kept in the dark about government activity.

    “It says this district does not want constituents to know how it’s spending its money,” Bender said. “They’re going to drag it out as long as they possibly can and set the charges as high as they possibly can to dissuade people from finding out actually what goes on.”

    Bender also challenged the legitimacy of the district’s charges. He said it shouldn’t take much effort or paperwork to provide credit card statements, cancelled checks or other documents specifying how the district spends taxpayer money.

    State law allows the public to review records at no cost. The intent is to help information seekers mitigate costs by identifying specific records to reproduce.

    Green has not responded to multiple requests from The Voice to inspect documents showing how money is spent from the superintendent’s discretionary account.

    “The law is clear. You’re entitled to see information taken in any account or voucher, so unless they have some obscure accounting system, you should be able to look at checks written on that fund,” Bender said. “And it should be itemized with respect to that fund. It shouldn’t [cost] anything to look at it.”

    The district’s obfuscation of financial records isn’t limited to the general public or press.

    Board Trustee Paula Hartman said she’s tried unsuccessfully for years to shed light on how the superintendent spends discretionary funds. She noted concerns over transparency in Dr. Green’s annual evaluation earlier this month.

    In June 2017, she and former trustee Annie McDaniel quizzed Dr. Green and other district officials about how superintendent discretionary funds are spent, but never received a detailed answer.

    “Quite a few years back I asked for that,” Hartman said. “He (Green) had told us he would let us know what was spent out of there each year and he hasn’t done that.”

    Green eventually acknowledged the fund does pay for trips for student clubs, such as the Griffin Bow Tie Club and the Elite Ladies of Fairfield County School District.

    The Voice requested more detailed expenses from the superintendent’s discretionary fund because it’s not itemized within the school district budget.

    In 2018-2019, the school board budgeted $404,874 for the superintendent’s office, but the budget doesn’t break out the discretionary fund. The 2017-2018 budget also doesn’t itemize the fund.

    Previous budgets between 2012-2013 and 2016-2017 were not available because links to those documents on the district’s website are broken. A district office representative couldn’t be reached before press time because the school district is on winter break until Jan. 3, according to the district’s website.

    Hartman asked about the account again this past June, specifically asking how much money was spent to send members of the Griffin Bow Tie Club to Churchill Downs in Louisville, Kentucky. Green couldn’t say, and six months later, an accounting of the trip has not been provided.

    Hartman also asked Green why the multi-day trip had not come before the board for approval as required by board policy.

    “I’d have to go back and check. It very well could’ve been an oversight,” Green said at the June meeting.

    “At a later meeting he confirmed that the trip had not been presented to the board for approval,” Hartman told The Voice. “We actually were not even informed that he was taking them to Kentucky, which is against board policy.”

    It’s also unclear how the Churchill Downs trip aligned with learning standards mapped out by the S.C. Department of Education. That information was not available since Green did not request board approval for the trip.

  • USC launches initiative to benefit FCSD

    University of South Carolina President Bob Caslen, center, and his wife Shelly, arrive at the Fairifeld County School District office Wednesday morning prior to announcing the University’s ALL4SC initiative and partnership with Fairfield County School District. USC Research Professor Barnett Berry, left, who is heading up the initiative, USC College of Education Dean Jon Pedersen and Superintendent Dr. J. R. Green also spoke at the event. | Barbara Ball

    WINNSBORO – University of South Carolina President Bob Caslen stopped in Winnsboro during his ‘bus tour’ of South Carolina Wednesday morning to announce the launch of a University initiative, the Accelerator for Learning and Leadership for South Carolina (ALL4SC). Caslen also announced that ALL4SC is partnering its first efforts with the Fairfield County School District.

    Caslen said ALL4SC is an outreach initiative with the purpose of bringing university researchers together with community and business leaders, teachers, students and lawmakers to create a strategy to close achievement and opportunity gaps for students in the Fairfield Community and eventually in other areas of the state.

    A statement issued by the University prior to the meeting noted that a growing number of communities in South Carolina are losing industries and jobs as well as facing a dire teacher shortage. Student performance lags behind the national average. Support services that address the academic, physical and social well-being of children and their families are often underutilized.

    ALL4SC is focused on changing this trajectory, Caslen said during remarks before a group of Fairfield County students, media and members of the community gathered at the district office for the announcement. Vernon Kennedy, Sr., the executive director of Fairfield Behavioral Health Services, USC College of Education Dean Jon Pedersen, USC Research Professor Barnett Berry and Superintendent Dr. J. R. Green were also on hand to address the group.

    According to Berry, ALL4SC will focus on community-based schooling that integrates the academic, social and health needs of students; creative approaches to preparing and supporting educators; leadership development that spurs entrepreneurship in public education and evidence-based storytelling to inform and engage policymakers, parents and community leaders

    Because the meeting was still in progress at press time Wednesday morning, details of the ALL4SC initiative in conjunction with the Fairfield School District will appear in the Nov. 27 issue of The Voice.

  • Board’s Promise vote leaves some unfunded

    Green: School Board will revote Promise funding issue next month

    WINNSBORO – All Fairfield County high school graduates are not currently able to receive free college tuition funds contributed by the Fairfield County School District as promised last summer under the newly minted Promise Program.

    A school board vote last week left Promise Program tuition funding for private, charter and home schoolers to the county.

    As initially conceived, the Promise Program called for the school district and county council each to pledge $75,000 annually, or $150,000 altogether, to the program administrated by Midlands Technical College.

    In September, Green announced that the district moved forward with its version of the Promise Program, noting that 24 students made up the initial group of students receiving free tuition.

    While the school district opted for lump sum payments to Midlands Tech, some council members, saying they desired greater accountability, preferred to be billed after qualifying students successfully met eligibility requirements.

    Thus, the school district and county ended up signing separate Memorandums of Understanding agreements with Midlands Tech. There was no indication in either agreement, however, that any of the designated graduates would not be allowed to draw funds from both contributors.

    Last week, during its regular monthly board meeting, the Fairfield County School District board of trustees voted 6-1, with trustee Paula Hartman against, to revise its Memorandum of Understanding. One of the revisions eliminated previously eligible graduates of private schools, charter schools and home schools from receiving tuition from the portion of the Promise Program funded by the Fairfield County School District.

    The revised agreement states, under Student Eligibility: “Must be a Fairfield County resident with a valid high school diploma (or GED) from Fairfield County School District,” with no mention of funding for the private, charter and homeschooled students.

    The change in the district’s funding contradicts initial promises from District Superintendent Dr. J. R. Green that graduates of private, public and home schools as well as Fairfield County School District graduates (and with GEDs) would be eligible for free tuition to attend Midlands Technical College.

    Asked by The Voice why the district had decided to reserve its funds for Fairfield County School District students, Green replied via email, “The Promise Initiative still accommodates charter school, home school, and private school students in the county.  As you know there are now two separate agreements with MTC.  One with the county and one with the school district.  Funding for those students is covered in the county MOU.”

    While those students would be eligible for funds contributed to the program by county council, the contract signed by the county and submitted in July to Midlands Tech has not yet been ratified by Midlands Tech. Without that ratification the county’s agreement is invalid, essentially leaving the private, charter and home schooled graduates currently with no Promise funding.

    When contacted on Monday, County Council Chairman Neil Robinson, County Administrator Jason Taylor, Headmaster of Richard Winn Academy (Kristen Chaison) and Midlands STEM Institute Principal Cynthia Prince said they were unaware of the revision in the district’s agreement.

    “I have not discussed that specific change with Dr. Green,” Taylor said. “I wasn’t aware that a change had occurred, but that’s the school district’s choice.”

    In addition, the county is still waiting on feedback and final signoff from Midlands Tech, Taylor said.

    Over the course of several email exchanges on Monday between The Voice and Green, he did not change his position on the revision.

    By Tuesday, however, Green told The Voice via email that the school district would revisit the MOU at the board’s next meeting which is set for Nov. 19, according to the district’s website.

    “I will present the Fairfield County School Board of Trustees with a revised MOU that includes home school, charter school and private school students from Fairfield County,” Green wrote.

    Endowment Option

    In addition to restricting who is eligible for free tuition, the district inserted verbiage into the MOU that alters the Fairfield Promise from a pure scholarship program to an endowment.

    Green said doing so creates tax benefits for businesses that may wish to contribute. It also allows the district to use interest earned to further subsidize the program.

    “We would use interest to help fund the program. Therefore you don’t need to count on a line item in the budget on a year-to-year basis,” he said.

    Under the new MOU, the district can make annual contributions of $75,000 for five years up to $350,000.

    “We have the option to continue contributing up to $75,000 a year. Or if the district decides somewhere between now and the conclusion of those five years, that they want to pay the balance of the $375,000, they have the option as well,” Green said. “That just gives the district flexibility to fund it differently.”

    The deal commits Midlands Tech to raising at least $125,000 over five years to augment the endowment. Midlands Tech is designated as the fiscal agent for the endowment.

    “An endowment provides for long-term sustainability as we strive to establish the Promise initiative to students who are in kindergarten now,” Green said. “We need to provide long term funding for those programs.”

    Midlands Tech must submit a report at the end of each academic term stating the name and number of recipients and “other reportable information (in compliance of applicable laws) that is agreed to by the district and the college,” the MOU states.

    Barbara Ball contributed to this story.

  • District’s report card mixed

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County elementary students did well in classroom testing last school year, but successes didn’t carry forward into middle and high school scores.

    Fairfield Magnet School for Math & Science and Kelly Miller Elementary both received “Excellent” ratings, the highest possible on the 2019 South Carolina report cards, which were released last week.

    Fairfield Middle and Fairfield Central High, however, struggled.

    Fairfield Middle School received an Unsatisfactory rating, earning just 22 of a possible 100 points. Only seven middle schools received the state’s worst rating, according to report card results.

    Fairfield High School received an Average rating, the same as last year, but the school’s score plunged from 57 to 51 points, placing it just one point shy of “Below Average.”

    Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green couldn’t be reached for comment.

    William Frick, chairman of the Fairfield County Board of Trustees, also couldn’t be reached.

    Behind the Ratings

    Since 2012, when Green became superintendent, the district has received an Average rating every year except in 2016 and 2017, when the state didn’t issue accountability ratings.

    The ratings returned after the report cards were revamped in 2018.

    Report cards grade schools based on these indicators: Academic Achievement, Preparing for Success, College & Career Readiness, Graduation Rate and Student Engagement. Varying weights are given to each category in calculating a school’s overall rating.

    Here’s a breakdown of how each school performed in 2019, with the 2018 rating in parentheses:

    Fairfield Magnet School for Math & Science – Excellent (Excellent 2018)

    Kelly Miller Elementary — Excellent (up from Good 2018)

    Geiger Elementary — Good (up from Average 2018)

    Fairfield Elementary — Average (up from Below Average 2018)

    McCrorey-Liston Elementary — Average (Average 2018)

    Fairfield Central High School — Average (Average 2018)

    Fairfield Middle — Unsatisfactory (down from Below Average 2018)

    Fairfield Middle

    Report card figures paint a grim picture behind Fairfield Middle’s unsatisfactory rating.

    On the SC Ready language arts exam, only 26.1 percent of students met or exceeded standards compared to 31.3 percent for the district and 45.4 percent in the state.

    Fairfield Middle struggled even more on the SC Ready math exam.

    Only 17.5 percent (69 of 395) met or exceeded the standard, less than half the district’s performance (35.8 percent) and also below the state average of 45.1 percent.

    Fairfield Middle’s prime instructional time fell four percentage points, from 89% to 84.9%. One in five students (20.9%) was chronically absent, while teacher attendance tumbled from 96.9% to 91.2%

    Student-teacher ratios rose to 16.8 to 1, up from 15.6 to 1, figures show.

    Teachers with advanced degrees dropped from 72.1% to 66.7% while teachers returning from the previous year plunged nearly 9% (81.1% to 72.5%).

    Fairfield Central

    Fairfield Central eked out an Average rating despite receiving Below Average ratings in the categories of Academic Achievement, Preparing for Success and College & Career Readiness subcategories.

    An Excellent rating on Student Engagement and Average rating for Graduation Rate (81%) saved Fairfield High from receiving an overall Below Average rating.

    Fairfield High students struggled on English and Math end of course tests, with less than half of 200 test takers earning at least a “C” on either exam.

    In Math, the drop in the number of Fairfield High students scoring “C” or better was profound – from 62.7% to 51%.

    English results declined as well, with the gap growing between Fairfield High and the state averages.

    The percentage of Fairfield students scoring “C” or better in English fell from 43.6% to 40.5%, while the state percentages rose from 53.9% to 56.3%.

    As with Fairfield Middle, Fairfield High experienced declines in teacher attendance, qualifications and retention, figures show.

    In 2019, Fairfield High staffed 54 teachers, down from 61 the previous year. The percentage of teachers with advanced degrees dropped from 68.9% to 59.3%

    Teachers on continuing contract fell from 63.9% to 57.4% while teachers returning from the previous year dropped from 80% to 77.8%

    District Level

    At the district level, teacher attendance fell from 96.1% to 93.3%, teachers on continuing contract fell from 63.2% to 58.7% and teachers with advanced degrees fell from 62% to 59.4%.

    Fairfield’s per pupil expenditures again led area schools at $17,780

    Fairfield Compensation

    Fairfield County average teacher salaries rose about 4.2 percent, from $49,288 to $51,363, from the 2017-2018 to 2018-2019 school years, according to report card data.

    However, the district’s percent of expenditures on teacher salaries dropped from 47.1% to 44.2%, data shows.

    Administrator salaries increased 1.77 percent, from $85,575 to $87,091.

    The district’s increases in teacher and administrator pay are less than the 5 percent raises that Green, the district’s superintendent, has received annually since 2015. His base pay is $182,287 plus benefits that bring his total to over $200,000.

    Green is contractually entitled to an automatic 5 percent raise every year provided he receives at least a Satisfactory rating on his annual evaluation.

    While the District’s overall ratings have remained at ‘Average’ during Green’s seven-year tenure in Fairfield, in December, the school board gave Green an ‘Exemplary’ rating and voted to extend his contract to 2024.

    Union

    For the second straight year under the revised report card system, none of Union County’s eight schools received an Unsatisfactory rating, despite the district resembling Fairfield both demographically and economically.

    Union’s average teacher pay was lowest among area districts at $46,611. Per pupil expenditures were $9,112, almost half of Fairfield’s.

    The district, however, reported two Below Average schools, up from only one in 2018.

    Four schools received Average ratings and one was rated Good. No Union County school received an Excellent rating.

    Kershaw (Note: Kershaw was accidentally left out of the story in the paper copy of the newspaper.)

    Kershaw County schools, which also had no unsatisfactory schools for the second year in a row, had the second highest average teacher salary in the area at $51,880. Per pupil expenditures were $9,034.

    However, two schools were rated as Below Average. Six schools received Average ratings while the district also had two Good and one Excellent school.

    Lancaster

    While four of the six school districts bordering Fairfield County had at least one school rated as Unsatisfactory on state report cards, only Lancaster reported two Unsatisfactory schools. Lancaster had none in 2018.

    Ten Lancaster schools, however, received either Good or Excellent ratings. Seven others were rated Average and two were Below Average.

    In 2018-2019, Lancaster teacher salaries rose about $1,200, from $49,413 to $50,657.

    Chester

    Chester County reported one Unsatisfactory school, down from three Unsatisfactory schools in 2018. Four schools received Average ratings while two others were rated as Good.

    Average teacher salaries remained virtually unchanged, creeping up to $49,309. Chester’s total per pupil expenditure was $10,767, highest among districts neighboring Fairfield, but well under Fairfield’s.

    Richland Two

    The area’s largest school district also turned in one of the strongest showings.

    Nearly two-thirds of Richland Two’s 39 schools received either Good (13) or Excellent (11) ratings. Another 13 schools received Average ratings.

    Richland Two only had one school rated Unsatisfactory and another was rated Below Average.

    The district had the highest average teacher salary at $52,149, slightly higher than last year’s average of $51,802.

    Newberry County

    Newberry County, which had no Unsatisfactory schools in 2018, had one school rated Unsatisfactory this year.

    Also in 2018-2019, the district had two schools rated Excellent, down from three last year. Five other schools received average ratings.

    Newberry had the second lowest average teacher salary in the area at $46,707, while the total per pupil expenditure was $10,696.

    To view the entire Report Card for South Carolina schools, go to: ed.sc.gov/data/report-cards/

  • Whitaker named FCSD’s top teacher

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County School District named its Teachers of the Year for the district’s eight schools as well as a District Teacher of the Year during the annual convocation.

    Crystal Whitaker, the Social Studies Department Chair at Fairfield Central High, was named the Fairfeld School District Teacher of the Year.

    Whitaker, who is in her eighth year of teaching – six of those at FCHS – teaches U. S. History and AP U.S. History

    The other seven schools in the district are being represented by their respective Teachers of the Year: Kerisha Camack (McCrory-Liston School of Technology), Kimberly DeReef (Fairfield Magnet School for Math & Science), Craig Jelks (Fairfield Middle School), Richard Johnson (Fairfield Career & Technology Center), Bryan Simmons (Kelly Miller Elementary School), Randall Sims (Fairfield Elementary School) and Lori Yarborough (Geiger Elementary School).

    Whitaker will be competing for the 2020 State Teacher of the Year.

  • County Promise awaits MTC’s OK

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield Promise, a program designed to allow qualifying students to attend college at no cost, is moving forward without participation from Fairfield County Council — at least for the time being.

    At last week’s Fairfield County school board meeting, Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green announced that 24 students are participating in the inaugural Promise Program class.

    Twenty-one graduated from Fairfield Central High School. Two from Richard Winn Academy and the other from a virtual charter school.

    “I anticipate we’ll see the number of students [attending] even higher next year,” he said, calling this year’s class “an excellent start.”

    Green has previously estimated that it would cost $150,000 to launch the Promise Program. The initial vision was for the county and school district to each pitch in matching $75,000 appropriations.

    On July 8, the school district, the county council and Midlands Tech signed a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, pledging to work together to craft a formal joint agreement.

    In the end, however, the school district and county signed separate agreements with Midlands Tech.

    The school district had already put together its version of the Promise Program agreement, voting June 4 to fund it and finalizing its approval on July 16.

    Fairfield County approved its version of the contract on Aug. 12, voting to “approve the [school district’s] Promise Program agreement with amendments,”

    The county’s contract has not yet been approved by Midlands Tech.

    Neil Robinson, chairman of Fairfield County Council, said that while the school district is doling out a $75,000 lump sum payment, the county has asked to be billed as needed.

    “We’re pulling money from two different pots (the school district and the county},” Robinson said. “From the council’s perspective, a majority of us wanted more accountability.”

    “The main thing here is kids are going to school for free,” Robinson said.

    The Voice sought a copy of the county’s version of the contract under the state’s open records law, but the county said it couldn’t comply, citing the lack of final approval [by Midlands Tech.] 

    “The Promise Program contract has not been executed by all parties,” County Attorney Tommy Morgan wrote in a response letter. “Therefore, the County is unable to provide those documents at this time pursuant to [state law].”

    Councilman Douglas Pauley said he supports the pay-as-you-go method as opposed to paying a lump sum.

    “We have not given our $75,000 yet,” Pauley said. “When they send us a bill with how many kids they’ve got, then we’ll cut them a check.”

    Green said the district moved forward on its own. He wouldn’t discuss the school district’s position on the county’s amendments, but acknowledged the county isn’t yet bound by the contract until it is approved by Midlands Tech.

    “I will defer to the county on their positions on specific amendments,” Green said.
    A recent Fairfield County school newspaper article stated that Green said the Promise Program wouldn’t require taxpayer support. 

    Green said the school newspaper was in error.

    “A student journalist covered the meeting and incorrectly stated that tax dollars would not be used to fund the program,” he said via email.

    At the May 14 school board meeting, during second reading of the 2019-2020 budget, the district announced the inclusion of $75,000 for the Promise Program, according to school board documents.

    Green has previously said he hoped the district could establish an endowment to fund the Promise Program. 

    “Ultimately, we may try to get to that point,” Green said. “But initially we [the school district and county] are funding it through our respective budgets.”

  • FCSD bans board’s contacts

    WINNSBORO – Shortly after the Fairfield County School Board passed a policy prohibiting school board members from communicating electronically during board meetings, one member took to his cell phone. 

    Board chairman William Frick didn’t appear to take notice or say anything as he briefed the board on some updates and announcements. A routine vote to select a delegate for an upcoming conference followed. 

    It was an ironic sequence of events given that Frick, so annoyed that board member Paula Hartman snapped a photo during a meeting two months earlier, crafted a board policy meant to suppress electronic device communications. 

    That policy (BEDL) passed final reading by a 6-1 vote at the Sept. 17 meeting. Hartman voted in opposition. 

    “This is against Freedom of Information and our rights,” Hartman said.

    Policy BEDL doesn’t disallow using electronic devices altogether, but it does bar board members from communicating with each other or audience members from the dais. It is not clear what actions if any can be taken against elected officials for breaking the new rule.

    The policy originated from an unsubstantiated claim Frick made in the days that followed the August board meeting. 

    In an email obtained by The Voice, Frick wrote — without providing any factual evidence for his claim — that “some board members are engaging in electronic communication with members of the public, including media,” during public meetings.

    “This conduct will no longer be tolerated,” the email states. “Such behavior is disruptive, inappropriate and likely violates public participation in meetings and receiving information requests from the media.”

    Frick pushed for the police because he said the use of electronic devices has become a distraction, although, videos of past board meetings do not bear that out. There have not been any electronic communications between The Voice and board members, and Frick has not sought to verify his claims.

    Also on Sept. 17, the board passed second reading on amendments to policy BEDB, which now compels board trustees to present any questions about an agenda item to the superintendent before the meeting.

    “Requests for additional information shall be specific and relevant to the topics on the agenda,” the revised policy states. “Onerous requests or ‘fishing expeditions’ shall be denied.”

    Hartman repeated her prior objections to both policies, saying they violate free speech and are inviting a lawsuit. 

    She also said both policies target her specifically. Hartman often casts the lone dissenting vote on a board that otherwise typically votes in lockstep.

    Under questioning from Hartman, Frick acknowledged he hadn’t consulted the board’s attorney regarding the policy revision. She asked a similar question at first reading in August.

    No other board member spoke about the policies.

    “I want to remind everybody this is against our First Amendment rights and the South Carolina Freedom of Information Act,” Hartman said before last week’s vote. “If there’s a lawsuit, I don’t want to be involved in it.”

    Jay Bender, an attorney with the S.C. Press Association, of which The Voice is a member, has said policy BEDB as written likely violates First Amendment protections.

    “I cannot imagine how that [policy] would be legitimate. That’s a classic First Amendment problem,” Bender said. “It’s the substance of the communication that the government wants to block here, which makes it suspect constitutionally.”

    Hartman added that the minutes incorrectly stated she abstained from voting on both policies at the August meeting. She voted against them at both readings.