Tag: Broad River Campground

  • JWC lawsuit thrown out

    JENKINSVILLE – A six-year legal battle over Jenkinsville water service has reached an end – for now. 

    On April 30, Circuit Court Judge Brian Gibbons sided with the Jenkinsville Water Company, throwing out a lawsuit filed by Broad River Campground that claimed breach of contract, fraud and other violations. 

    “The non-moving party is only required to submit a mere scintilla of evidence in order to withstand a motion for summary judgment,” the order states. “Summary judgment should be granted when plain, palpable and undisputable facts exist on which reasonable minds cannot differ.”

    An attorney for Broad River Campground, which in 2014 filed suit, said he plans to appeal. 

    “The court was erroneous in its decision to grant summary judgment. The standard we had to meet was met,” campground attorney Glenn Bowens said Tuesday. “You have to produce at least a scintilla of evidence and we had way more than that.”

    An attorney for the JWC could not be reached as of press time. 

    Bowens said the litigation is important because he said the JWC needs to be held accountable so that water service is available to all who request it.

    “Jenkinsville [Water Company] seems to think they can pick and choose who they want to provide water service to,” he said. “In the course of all of this, we found numerous people who were trying to get water services for their businesses and they were either denied water service or not granted what they needed exactly.”

    In his order, Judge Gibbons listed six reasons why he dismissed the case. Most boiled down to whether or not a water service contract existed between Broad River and the JWC. 

    Broad River argued that a 2009 letter from the JWC constituted a contract. In the letter, the JWC stated it could provide 175 gallons of water per day to serve 46 campsites, but only if it didn’t negatively impact customers.

    Broad River’s lawsuit says the JWC didn’t provide adequate water service despite having adequate capacity. The JWC denied it ever entered into a contract.

    Gibbons’ order states that testimony and pre-trial briefs established that campground co-owner Dee Melton never agreed to any restrictions on the campground’s right to expand.

    “Defendant JWC is entitled to summary judgment and a dismissal with prejudice as to the breach of contract claim because there was no meeting of the minds as to the essential terms of the October 2009 Letter,” the order states. “Accordingly, the Court finds that the Parties never entered into a valid, legally binding contract regarding water usage.”

    By extension, negating the 2009 letter also negated other breach of contract claims related to the water company’s bylaws, a water user agreement and a 2009 oral promise by the JWC to provide up to 40,000 gallons of water per day for up to 200 campsites, the order continued.

    “Plaintiff’s co-owner, Dee Melton, should have been aware of the alleged existence of these purported contracts, yet he did not identify any of them in response to direct questions from Defendant’s counsel,” the order states.

    Gibbons also dismissed the suit on statute of limitations grounds. He wrote in his order that Broad River amended its original 2014 suit in 2018, which the judge said exceeded the three-year statute of limitations on litigation.

    Gibbons threw additional cold water on the campground’s argument that the breach of contract constituted fraud.

    “Without a valid and enforceable contract and its subsequent breach, Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act fails as a matter of law,” the order says.

    The lawsuit’s dismissal doesn’t spell an end to litigation for the JWC. 

    Broad River also sued the water company in 2016, accusing the group routinely violating state open meeting and public record laws. That suit is still pending. 

    And Fairfield County Councilwoman Bertha Goins countersued the JWC in April, claiming the slander suit the water company filed against her a month earlier was an attempt to harass and intimidate her after she publicly voiced concerns over Jenkinsville water quality. That case is also still pending. 

  • Former board member blasts JWC

    JENKINSVILLE – Jenkinsville Water Company leaders “willfully” provided false and misleading information about the water company’s ability to provide water service to its customers, according to documents filed in Broad River Campground’s ongoing lawsuit against the JWC.

    Also filed recently is a sworn affidavit from former JWC board member Lori Smith, who issued a blistering rebuke of the water company and its president, Gregrey Ginyard.

    “Mr. Ginyard did not hold up JWC’s part of the bargain with the Campground because he never allowed the Campground to use the full amount of water JWC agreed to provide contractually,” the affidavit states.

    A circuit judge is expected to rule soon on whether or not to accept amended litigation that says Ginyard and vice president Joseph McBride broke an agreement to provide water services to the Campground.

    In previous filings, the JWC said water is a finite resource that must be regulated. It has denied entering into a contract, saying what the campground considers a contract was actually a letter outlining water capacity.

    “JWC’s actions did not harm the public interests, as the Company acted prudently to ensure that the water would be conserved properly and would be available to other customers and potential customers,” the filing states. “The parties never had a meeting of the minds and never entered into a valid contract.”

    A campground attorney also filed a motion to consolidate the case with two related cases that name Ginyard and McBride individually.

    Circuit Judge Grace Knie took both motions under advisement. She also directed attorneys for the campground and JWC to prepare proposed orders within 10 days of an order she signed June 7.

    Campground attorney Glenn Bowens said in court documents that the amended complaint was necessary due to new information unearthed during discovery, court documents state.

    The amended complaint includes numerous new allegations.

    For example, court documents state the JWC denied water service in 2014 to additional campground sites despite having more than 76 million gallons of unused water capacity.

    The amended complaint also states the JWC gives residential customers preferential treatment over commercial customers. Water service was denied to a church and businesses, while granted to private residents, the litigation states.

    Additionally, the JWC board commits to courses of action while in executive session, the lawsuit states.

    The state’s Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, prohibits public bodies from voting or even conducting informal polls while in executive session.

    “[The] policy of residents first and preferential treatment/more favorable for residents makes it likely the unfair and deceptive acts and practices will occur once again in the future,” the amended complaint states.

    Smith, the former JWC board member, repeats many of the assertions from the amended complaint in her affidavit.

    The affidavit includes new allegations as well, including one that says Ginyard often polled board members in advance of meetings.

    “If Mr. Ginyard wanted a vote to go a particular way he would call Board members and try to get them to vote his way,” the document states. “He intimidated members of the Board who were supporting the campground.”

    In the end, Smith said she resigned from the board, citing medical reasons.

    “I resigned because of medical reasons due to the stress caused by the continuous hiding of information and false information being provided to the Board during the meetings.”

  • Lack of transparency still dogs JWC

    JENKINSVILLE – Transparency complaints continue to muddy the waters of the Jenkinsville Water Company.

    Continuing a dispute that arose during the JWC’s meeting in April, several members of the public contested a murky vote taken by the board last month.

    “When you vote on items, when you don’t tell us what it is, we as a member of the company have a right to know what those items are,” Donald Melton with the Broad River Campground, who is in litigation with the JWC, said during public comments Monday.

    Specifically, Melton took issue with a series of votes the JWC conducted during the April meeting.

    After a lengthy executive session, the board voted merely to accept “Item A,” “Item B” and “Item C” without specifying what those items involved.

    “The board cannot vote on just a name and a number. Will that be different tonight and here on out?” Melton asked.

    Board members remained mainly silent, responding only to say they couldn’t and wouldn’t respond to questions posed in public input.

    “We’re not going to go back and forth in meetings like that. We’ve told you that before,” Greg Ginyard, president of the JWC, stated.

    Melton took the entire three minutes allotted in public input, even though he spoke for roughly half that time.

    Ginyard did respond to Jeff Schaffer, another member of the public, who also criticized what he characterized as a lack of transparency.

    “Is it the new policy not to answer questions a member asks? Is there a policy for that?” Schaffer asked.

    “No sir, I’m giving you this because you haven’t been here in a while, but we’re not taking time to go back and forth between the board,” Ginyard said.

    Ginyard went on to say that numerous government bodies don’t respond to questions. He directed anyone desiring a response to submit written questions to the board.

    The Voice newspaper also addressed the board, cautioning members that JWC votes could be legally overturned when they’re conducted during meetings in which violations of the state’s Freedom of Information Act occur.

    In 1991, the S.C. Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of a Sumter County business license tax ordinance because the ordinance was passed following improper executive sessions, according to Supreme Court records.

    During an interview with The Voice following Monday’s meeting, Ginyard said he doesn’t think the water company is subject to FOIA.

    “We don’t feel that we are a governmental body,” he said.

    Ginyard didn’t respond to follow-up questions referencing a 2011 attorney general opinion classifying the JWC is a public body, and promptly left the building.

    That opinion stated the JWC was chartered in 1970 through a U.S. Department of Agriculture loan.

    The opinion also stated that through the years, the JWC has received government funding totaling at least $200,000 from the S.C. Budget and Control Board, as well as additional funding from Fairfield County Council.

    The council later threatened to cut off funding, citing transparency issues. Specifically, the county demanded copies of audits and federal tax records, the attorney general opinion stated.

    “Unfortunately, until you are able to provide the County with this information, the County will not be able to consider any funding requests from your organization; will discontinue and County funding to your organization; plus, will not be able to act as a pass-through for you on any grants or loans from any other governmental or charitable organizations,” the county stated in a letter cited in the attorney general opinion.

    Jay Bender, an attorney for the S.C. Press Association and expert on the FOIA, agreed with the attorney general’s opinion.

    “This organization (JWC) does not understand it is a public body and it is obligated to follow the law,” Bender said. “If it wants to act privately, what it does is give the money back. Don’t take public money if you want to act like a private corporation.”

     

  • Trial for JWC, board set for May 7

    JENKINSVILLE – Motions relating to pending lawsuits against the Jenkinsville Water Company and some of its officers are scheduled to be heard in a Fairfield County courtroom this week. In all, four motions will be heard on Friday, April 27. A trial date of May 7 has been set in one of the lawsuits, according to Fairfield County court documents.

    Ginyard

    One motion on Friday’s docket seeks to merge two similarly worded lawsuits – one filed in 2014 and the other in 2016. Both suits were filed by the Broad River Campground.  JWC is named as the lone defendant in the 2014 suit, while JWC president Greg Ginyard and vice president Joseph McBride are co-defendants in the 2016 litigation.

    Both suits concern a dispute over water usage agreements between the campground and the JWC. They also dispute how rates were calculated. Many people living at the campground were workers at the V.C. Summer nuclear plant in Jenkinsville. More water service was needed to accommodate growth in the campsites, the lawsuits state.

    “Jenkinsville Water Co., led by Ginyard and McBride, unfairly, unreasonably, and dishonestly used an inflated estimated water usage rate rather than the actual water usage rate … in making the decision to deny the additional 49 campsites,” the campground states in its complaint.

    Another motion the campground filed seeks permission to amend its original complaint. Additional details were not contained in court documents, and will be presented during Friday’s hearing, court documents state.

    The court will also hear a motion for summary judgment filed by the JWC.

    In a memo, the JWC said water is a finite resource that must be regulated.

    “JWC’s actions did not harm the public interests, as the Company acted prudently to ensure that the water would be conserved properly and would be available to other customers and potential customers,” the memo states.

    Specifically, a 2009 letter the JWC wrote to Broad River Campground stated water usage was capped at 8,050 gallons per day, but the number would rise to 21,000 gallons per day if service to the additional sites was approved.

    JWC also disputes the assertion that the letter constitutes a contract.

    “The parties never had a meeting of the minds and never entered into a valid contract,” the memo states.

    Broad River Campground filed another lawsuit in December 2016 that alleges the JWC has violated the state’s Freedom of Information Act. That case is still pending and it is not on the docket Friday.


    Related articles: Water Company Faces FOIA LawsuitWater Company Officers Added to Lawsuit,