Tag: Blythewood Town Council

  • County industrial property to go to RCPC

    BLYTHEWOOD – Of the 1,300 acres that Richland County hopes to purchase and have rezoned for a Blythewood Industrial Park, almost 500 acres (two parcels) are in the county, not the Town of Blythewood, and the county will have jurisdiction over their re-zoning.

    The two parcels, located along Blythewood Road, west of Fairfield Electric Cooperative’s facility, will go before the Richland County planning commission Monday, Sept. 9 at 3 p.m. for a public hearing and recommendation to council.

    While the public can sign up to speak their minds about the rezoning, county staff has already made up its collective mind, recommending that the planning commission not approve the rezoning.

    Both parcels are zoned rural (RU). The County is asking for one of the parcels (456.01 acres) to be rezoned to Light Industrial (LI) and the other (27.54 acres) to be zoned for General Commercial (GC).

    The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan designates the RU zoned area as Neighborhood (Low-Density) for future zoning.

    According to the staff report, the LI district is intended to accommodate wholesaling, distribution, storage, processing, light manufacturing and general commercial uses.

    “The zoning request [for the 456.01 acres] is not consistent with the objectives for non-residential development within the Neighborhood (Low-Density) future land use designation,” staff stated in its report. “Within the Neighborhood (Low Density) designation, the Comprehensive Plan recommends that industrial development with significant community impacts, i.e., noise, exhaust, odor, heavy truck traffic) is discouraged. The variety of industrial uses allowed under the LI district includes potential uses which would be incompatible with the general area as it is currently developed.”

    For these reasons, staff recommended disapproval of the requested map amendment.

    Likewise, the county’s planning staff recommended disapproval of GC for the smaller parcel, stating that it was not consistent with surrounding zoning and would constitute leapfrog development.

    Blythewood Town Council has rezoned about 600 acres from Development (D-1) zoning to Limited Industrial (LI) at Richland County’s request and passed the first of two votes to rezone the remaining 163 acres of the 1,300 acres.

    The Blythewood planning commission voted 3-3 on the recommendation to Town Council which resulted in no recommendation. Blythewood Council will take its second and final vote on September 23.

    Richland County Planning Commission will meet on Sept. 9 at 3 p.m. in Council Chambers, 2020 Hampton Street in Columbia 29202. The Commission’s recommendation will then go to County Council.

    Blythewood Town Council will meet on Sept. 23 at 7 p.m., at the Doko Manor. That vote will be the final vote for the rezoning request for the 163 acres.

  • Eight candidates file for council, mayor seat

    BLYTHEWOOD – Eight town residents have filed for elective office in the upcoming Nov. 5 municipal elections – three candidates for mayor and five candidates for two at-large town council seats. The filing period ended Tuesday at 5 p.m.

    Filing to run for the four-year term of mayor are: former Blythewood Mayor Keith Bailey and town council members Bryan S. Franklin and Malcolm P. Gordge.

    Filing to run for the two four-year term council seats are: incumbent Eddie Baughman, Barry J. Belville, planning commission chair Donald Beaton Brock, Jr., planning commissioner Sloan Jarvis Griffin, III and former planning commissioner Marcus Taylor.

    Mayoral Candidates

    Bailey, Franklin and Gordge are all residents of the Ashley Oaks neighborhood.

    Bailey, a retired Army major and former mayor of Blythewood, began his municipal government career when he applied for the planning commission in 2002.  He was elected to the town council, serving from 2004-08, and then elected mayor, serving from 2008-12. Bailey holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Hampton University in Virginia. His wife is Marilyn Bailey, and they have three grown sons who graduated from Blythewood High School.

    Franklin, retired from the Army as a Lt. Colonel, has served three years on the planning commission and the third year as chairman. He was elected to town council two years ago. Franklin graduated from the Citadel in 1990. He is married to Desde mona Franklin, and they have three grown children and five children still at home attending Blythewood schools.

    Gordge, a retired mechanical engineer, is a native of England. Gordge has lived in Blythewood since 2004. He served on the town’s planning commission for three years beginning February, 2013 and as chairman during 2014. He was elected to town council in November of 2015.  Gordge attended Gloucestershire College of Art and Technology in the United Kingdom and was awarded a Higher National Certificate (equivalent to a Bachelor’s degree) in Mechanical Engineering. Gordge is married to Emily Gordge, and they have a grown son, Zac.

    Council Candidates

    Baughman, a Navy veteran and retired from the Columbia Fire Department, was elected to town council in 2014 to fill the unexpired term of Roger Hovis who resigned to become a Richland County Sheriff’s deputy. Baughman was re-elected to a full four-year term in 2016. He currently serves as Mayor Pro Tem. A resident of the Lake Ashley area, Baughman is married to Donna Baughman and they have two grown children.

    Belville, the assistant athletic director for the Lexington Recreation and Aging Commission, lives in Cobblestone Park. A six-year resident of Blythewood, Belville said he has no political experience. He is married to Lindsay Belville and has three children ages 8, 5 and 2.

    Brock, an investment accountant with Public Employee Benefits Authority, has served on the town’s planning commission since 2016 and currently serves as chairman. He ran for mayor in 2017. Brock holds a Masters in Accountancy from the University of South Carolina. He is married to Mary Sternick Brock, and they have three children who attend Blythewood schools.

    Griffin is emergency preparedness coordinator II for SC DHEC. He has lived in Blythewood for three years and was appointed to the planning commission in October of last year. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Fire Emergency Management from Kaplan University and is working toward a Master’s degree in public administration.  Griffin is married to Tennille Griffin and they are expecting their first child in October.

    Taylor, a self-employed structured wire technician, served on the planning commission from 2006-18. He lives in Dawson’s Creek and studied criminal justice at South University in Columbia. Taylor is married to April and they have two grown children and one child at home.

    Candidate Forum

    The Voice will publish campaign statements from each candidate in early October. A candidate forum, hosted by The Voice newspaper, will be held at Doko Manor on Oct. 24.

    Register to Vote

    The last day to register to vote in person for this election is Saturday, Oct. 5, by 12 noon. Voter registration by mail must be postmarked no later than Monday, Oct. 7. Voter Registration online, fax or by email must be entered no later than Sunday, Oct. 6, by 11:59 pm.

    To register to vote or to obtain absentee ballots, contact the Richland County Voter Registration Office, 2020 Hampton Street, Columbia, S.C. Absentee ballots may be requested by calling the Voter Registration Office at 576-2240. In-Person absentee voting will begin Monday, Oct. 7 at 2020 Hampton Street.

    The Polls will be open from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. The polling place for all precincts in this election – Blythewood 1, Blythewood 2, Blythewood 3, Longcreek and Ridgeway (Fairfield County) – will be at Blythewood Park, 126 Boney Road in Blythewood.

  • The deed is done – Doko Depot is sold!

    Doko Depot

    BLYTHEWOOD – Approximately seven years after council voted in August, 2012, to pursue an economic development project that was characterized as the site where a replica of the town’s original train depot would be built, it appears that the disposition of that replica, the Doko Depot spec building, which sits across from Town Hall, has been sold – finally – but not without one more hitch.

    During last week’s regular monthly meeting, council was asked to authorize an amendment to the sales ordinance to reduce the purchase price of the building.

    “I would ask that you amend the contract at the request of the purchaser to an amount of $305,000 for expenses the purchaser has incurred over the last several months due to the delay of closing,” the town’s Economic Development consultant Ed Parler said, addressing council.

    That delay was due to the discovery about two years ago that the deed to the property was not clear despite the fact that the Town had paid $34,492.80 to two legal firms – Parker Poe and Winters Law Firm – for the initial legal work on the depot project. Satisfying that deed ended up costing the town another $39,922.07 ($14,639.26 to Callison Tigh law firm and $25,000 to Margaret DuBard who previously owned a portion of the property where the Depot sits).

    The total cost of the project, $469,908.52, includes the $74,132.06 in legal fees plus $147,872.50 in miscellaneous expenses including financing costs, architectural costs and other expenses incurred by the Town in the fiscal year prior to construction.

    In an interview with The Voice on Tuesday, Mayor J. Michael Ross said he was not happy with how much the Town had to pay to satisfy the deed for the depot.

    “There’s a reason why we’re where we are,” Ross said. “I’m not sure how much of those legal expenses for the deed we can recover or if we will recover them at all,” Ross said. “But we [council] are going to discuss it in executive session at the next meeting.”

    The project was originally funded through two grants totaling $456,881 from Fairfield Electric Cooperative as part of a franchise fee credit that is awarded for economic development purposes to governments and other institutions and nonprofits. Those grants plus the reduced sale price of $305,000 will leave the town with a net profit of $144,099.98 from the project.

    “When the project began, the town committed to build a building for a specific client, a restauranteur who was going to occupy the building,” Parler told council last week. “This deal didn’t go forward, so council elected to build a spec building and put it out for purchase.”

    The building was constructed and, after myriad delays, Don Russo, owner of Freeway Music, agreed almost two years ago to purchase the building for his own business on one end and a restaurant on the other when it was discovered the deed was not clear.  

    “The town has not lost any money with this transaction,” Parler assured council. “The $456,881 used toward building the depot was grant money.”

    “I would say the end result, again, is an economic development project that started with some scars and might end with one,” Ross said. “The end result, though, is that the town benefits with close to $150,000 and the people get a great music school/performers and another local restaurant.  Not all loss!”

    After an executive session to discuss the matter, council voted unanimously to approve the reduction in sales price from $325,000 to $305,000. 

  • Council OKs first vote for industrial zoning

    County: Rezoning Must be Finalized by Late September

    BLYTHEWOOD – Richland County made another appeal to Town Council Monday night, the strongest yet, to approve the rezoning of 162 acres west of I-77 for industrial use. That effort was met by strong opposition from a room full of citizens and a couple of council members.

    The property is part of 1,349 acres the County hopes to purchase for $26 million for an industrial park. Town Council has already rezoned an adjacent 678 Blythewood acres to LI 2 at the County’s request. The remaining 509 adjacent acres are located in Richland County and are currently being rezoned for industrial use by the County. The county hopes to have the zoning of the entire 1,349 acres by late September. To pay for the purchase of the land, the County taking out a bond. Hence the hurry-up to rezone.

    “The goal is to close on the bond by Nov. 1,” Director of the County’s Economic Development office Jeff Rubble told council members Monday night. “As part of the bonding process, the folks that sell the bonds want to see that the property is zoned consistent with its intended use [prior to issuing the bond.] So that’s the reason we’re coming to you now.”

    After the better part of a two hour meeting and an hour of contentious speeches by citizens opposed for one reason or another to the rezoning process, Council voted 4 – 1 to approve first reading. While Councilmen Bryan Franklin and Malcolm Gordge addressed stipulations they would like to see in regard to the rezoning, only Franklin voted against it.  A second and final reading is set for Sept. 23.

    “We would like to have gone through a nice, slow process, with about 100 different community meetings,” Ruble said. “But they’re saying, ‘Guys, you’ve got to sign or we can’t buy.’ So that has accelerated our process. That’s why we’re here tonight,” Ruble said. Addressing the concerns of those he said he expected to oppose the rezoning during public comment time at the meeting, Ruble assured the packed audience that the county is not trying to ram something down their throats, giving examples of how the County is trying to be accommodating to the town.

    “We will set 100 foot buffers and try to route as much of the heavy traffic as we can to Community Road to the south, away from town,” Ruble said. “By the second reading, we want to have covenants and restrictions in place for you to see.  We plan to set up an Architectural Review Board (ARB) for new companies coming into the industrial park.”

     “The Town of Blythewood could have a designee on that review board. So you’re not just signing away your life now. You’re an active participant in helping us develop it,” Ruble said.

    Those concessions fell short for audience members who insisted the ARB should predominately be peopled by Blythewood folks since the 840 acres of the industrial park are in the town.

    Ruble said the county envisions walking trails, bike paths and other amenities in the park. He also promised clean, high tech manufacturing.

    “We’re trying to create that nice environment. The kind of companies we’re trying to target are the higher rated companies with high wages and technology companies,” Ruble said.

    Warning: We Walk

    “I wish we had more time to have meetings and talk. But this is a critical step that if you turn it down tonight, we walk,” Ruble warned.

    He also warned that the land could be purchased for homes, many homes that could bring higher levels of traffic.

    “We know the [property] owners are hearing every day from residential developers,” Ruble said. “There’s a lot of folks offering money. What we heard from the town was they don’t necessarily want to see more dense residential development. We proposed a solution. Let us come in. We’ll buy the property and we’ll work together to develop it in conjunction with the town,” Ruble promised.

    But former Town Councilman Tom Utroska scoffed at what he called the emotional tact.

    “I’m taken aback that politics in our country are now run by emotions instead of facts,” Utroska said. “One emotional statement was made that it would be a lot better if it was an industrial development rather than some huge, complex of homes. Well, as I recall, in D-1 you have to have 20,000 square foot lots. So you can only get two homes to an acre. I don’t like leading people down a road and influencing them by telling them something that it’s not,” Utroska said. “Also, we need some kind of Memorandum of Understanding, in writing, that says what’s going to happen with the traffic that will be generated by this LI2. We also need something in writing to address the need for a fire station.”

    Utroska said he doesn’t want to look back 20 years from now and say ‘I’m a party to this. It’s a screw up.’

    “We shouldn’t have just one member on the ARB. The preponderance of the members should be from Blythewood if it’s in Blythewood,” he said. Utroska also called for a new exit off I-77 to accommodate the industrial park. “We don’t need semis on Blythewood Road going to the LI2 area.

    “I understand their need to have this done. But we need to have some protection,” Utroska said.

    Cobblestone resident John Moore called on Council to beware of the County’s promises.

    “I’m not opposed to the development. But it can change the shape of what we are. I don’t have a lot of trust in Richland County,” Moore said.

    Rural Blythewood resident Bill Shives also warned about the effect the development would have on the town.

    “So many people moved here because of the quality of life and what it has to offer,” Shives said “Once the tax incentives for companies and factories expire, they’re gone. I don’t see where that’s a great economic value to the community.”

    The town’s planning commission voted 3-3 for the rezoning earlier this month, leaving no recommendation to council from the commission. At that meeting, Stuart Andrews, who lives in the Middlefield Lane area off Persimmon Fork Road, suggested council eliminate the more intense manufacturing uses allowed in the LI2 zoning district.

    “Let’s not just open the door to everything,” Andrews said. “Some of those allowed uses we don’t consider good neighbors – textile mills, steel fabrication, wood product manufacturing, copper recovery, sheet metal, small arms and aircraft manufacturing,” he said. 

    “You can’t have a first class project unless you have a first class process,” Andrews said. Speaking Monday night for a number of rural residents along Syrup Mill and Persimmon Fork Roads, Andrews said the group had not reached a conclusion about whether they support the project or not. It depends in large part on the process itself,

    “It’s not fair to ask the public to support something with so little understanding of it,” Andrews said. He called for a process the community could participate in. “We aren’t going to be comfortable with a product presented publicly in 30 days.”

    Andrews asked for his group and others in the community to be allowed to review the covenants of restricted documents proposed for the project.

    “We’ve reviewed those documents for similar projects and have a feel for what needs to be in them, where the opportunities are for further public protection…With the County as a developer and public body, we think more public participation should be encouraged,” Andrews said.

    Rural resident Wes Penfield called for a portion of the park to be carved out for playing fields for area youth.

    Councilman Bryan Franklin agreed.

    “We now have an opportunity here with this property right here to take 40 acres on the north part that sits right on Blythewood Road and build us the park we’ve so need for years and years,” Franklin said. “This is an opportunity for us. The public is buying this property, we’re going to rezone it, maybe, and now is an opportunity to develop that upper end, buy it at a fair dollar and put our park there. When the lights go on and stay on until 11 o’clock at night. They won’t disturb anybody because it’s in an industrial area. It only makes sense.”

    Councilman Malcolm Gordge, who is running for the mayor’s seat in the upcoming election, said Franklin expressed his sentiments perfectly.

    “I would like to ask Jeff (Ruble) if he has any difficulty at all in pursuing that vision of a recreation area and football field within that LI2 district,” Gordge asked Ruble.

    “Yeah, I don’t know. I certainly can’t commit to something tonight. I think we’ve had some conversations with staff. So we’re working toward it,” Ruble said.

    Before calling for the vote, Mayor J. Michael Ross defended the project and the County’s process, saying “we have known about this for a long time. This is no surprise. I think that when you hear some of the things that they have talked about [in executive session], I can’t imagine that you would not want that level of a technology industrial campus. It would be unbelievable for this community and for this downtown.”

    Ross agreed with Ruble that if the industrial park doesn’t come, then more homes might take the space. But he also agreed with those who spoke, that traffic is an issue, that a fire station “is a no brainer,” but hedged on the call for more Blythwoodians on the proposed LI2 Architectural Review Board.

    “That needs to be a group that would be equally divided between the County and Blythewood,” he said. “But the sports complex is the clincher. I think that’s something we need to work on hard over the next 30 days to see if it can be done.

    The next meeting is set for Sept. 23 at 7 p.m. at The Manor.

  • Town considers fees for event vendors

    BLYTHEWOOD – The Town of Blythewood does not currently charge fees for vendors who participate in town-sponsored events such as the annual July 3 Rockin’ Red White & Blue fireworks celebration. But that’s about to change if council passes an ordinance it is framing for temporary vendor fees.

    While the discussions are in the initial stages, Steve Hasterok, Director of Events at Doko Mannor and Doko Park, suggested council should be looking ahead.

    Mayor J. Michael Ross told council members Monday evening that they are leaving money on the table by not charging vendor fees.

    “While the July 3 event is our signature event, the park keeps growing and there’ll probably be more opportunities to have vendors in the park,” Hasterok told council. He outlined three major areas he said council needs to look at.

    1. How much to charge food, drink, arts and crafts and other categories of vendors such as churches, non-profits and military organizations?
    2. What priority criteria should be used to deter mine what vendors and what type of vendors would be allowed to participant in town events?
    3. How to prioritize vendors who sell the same products, such as beer or hotdogs?

    Hasterok also suggested council should decide whether to charge flat fees or percentage of sales.

    “Charging a flat fee can be unfair if they are all charged the same fee. A beer vendor might sell $7,000 in beer while an arts and crafts vender might bring in $1,000,” Hasterok said. “But percentages are hard to track. You basically have to be on an honor system. A flat fee is easier.”

    Hasterok suggested possibly charging large vendors one price ($150), small specialty vendors another price ($100) and 501(c)3’s and mom and pops selling brownies, another price ($75).

    “I agree that we should cut a break for folks like small mom and pops and charities,” Councilman Malcolm Gordge said. “We could start off with the market rate and see how that goes.”

    “Most vendors expect to be paying a fee, but we don’t want to knock out the small vendors,” Hasterok said.

    “I think we’ve been missing an opportunity for years,” Ross said. “If we had charged $100 per vendor for the July 3 event, we would have made $2,100. That offsets the cost of those fireworks or we could have bought more fireworks,” Ross said. “I don’t think any vendor would mind having the opportunity to be able to sell to 4,000 – 5,000 people and to get the kind of money I believe they generate. And maybe we could discount further for smaller vendors or charities.”

    Hasterok said it’s also important to be sensitive to duplication of products sold by vendors.

    “We don’t want too many vendors selling the same thing,” he said. He also asked council if they wanted to give priority to in-town vendors who have brick and mortar business over outside vendors.

    “Are we going to grant exclusivity to certain vendors?” Hasterok asked. “There are other businesses here in town besides McNulty’s Taproom that may want to sell beer. We need to have a plan.”

    But Hasterok said 21 is just about the limit for the space in the park.

    “I know you can’t put anymore vendors in there,” Councilman Eddie Baughman said, “but the lines are really long, and we don’t want people waiting 45 minutes to get something to eat.”

    “We’re getting lots more vendors who want to sell at our park events,” Hasterok said. “They search the web for events and call us, and we really need a policy on what we’re going to do.”

    “Can we, within our rights, give preference to brick and mortar businesses in Blythewood for vendor space?” Ross asked Town Attorney Jim Meggs.

    “I don’t know,” Meggs said. “Local preferences can be problematic.”

    “We have a few months to work on this,” Ross said. “But I think we’ve let money get away from us that we could have gotten that is very fair. A hundred dollars is not going to scare anyone off. But there are some other things we need to have Mr. Meggs to check on.”

  • Bravo Blythewood concerts lose $18K+

    BLYTHEWOOD – Last December, town council awarded $17,360 in hospitality tax revenue to Bravo Blythewood to organize a four-night Spring concert series with the purpose of bringing visitors to the town. During Monday night’s town council meeting, Mayor J. Michael Ross presented Bravo Blythewood’s final report on the series. It revealed that the concerts not only failed to bring many visitors to town, but that Bravo Blythewood lost $18,140.53 on the four concerts.

    And if that wasn’t enough to raise the mayor’s and council’s ire, there was more. No one showed up at the meeting to answer for the loss.

    The four concerts were performed in the Palmetto Citizens’ Credit Union Amphitheater in Doko Park April 27, May 3, 10 and 17.

    In the application requesting hospitality funds, event manager Sara Ballard projected revenues of $46,054: $17,360 from H-Tax funds; $11,000 from sponsorships; $1,500 from food vendors, $14,560 from beer/wine sales and $1,634 from juice and water sales.

    Besides the town’s contribution, the event only brought in $8,618 ($3,568 from beer/wine sales, $2,000 from sponsorships, $2,000 from Martha Jones, president of Bravo Blythewood and $1,050 from vendor fees).

    The projected revenue fell short $7,000 on sponsorships, $450 on food vendors; $10,992 on beer/wine sales and $1,634 on juice and water sales.

    “I’ll just say I hope this wasn’t their major fundraiser,” Ross joked, then turned serious.

    “Why is no one from Bravo Blythewood here tonight?” Ross asked. Buddy Price, a Bravo Blythewood board member, had been in the audience but left before the agenda item came up.

    “It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see where their projections were way off,” Ross said. “And some expenses I would question. I’m not an event planner, but there are some things that, well, I can see where they lost some money,” he continued.

    “I see Sara Ballard [the event planner] is not here,” Ross said, scanning the audience. “But I would have thought someone would be here. I don’t understand why they aren’t here to answer our questions. Gosh! We gave this money for them to bring people [to town]. So who do we ask?”

    “This is not good,” Councilman Eddie Baughman interjected

    According to Ballard’s report, she was paid $8,000 to organize the event. She was not paid (according to the final budget) a $1,000 bonus that was listed in the projected budget. Ballard was paid $1,000 for Facebook promotion – $900 to her company Broadstreet Consulting, LLC, for Facebook advertising and $100 for Facebook ad management. No breakdown or receipts were provided for any of the Facebook costs.

    In addition to lower than expected attendance, expenses ran amok in several areas, including $9,200 for sound system and lighting equipment that had not been included in the projected $46,054 event budget, and $4,315 for hired staff that was projected to cost $640.

    Ross ran through the list of losses, focusing on beer and wine sales and sponsorships.

    “But the one that is mind boggling to me is the sound costs. Sound was not even budgeted, yet they spent $9,200 on it,” Ross said, raising his voice.

    “You add these three losses up and that’s $26,000,” Ross said. “And they still haven’t paid the town the $3,000 they owe us for the venue (amphitheater).”

    “We have an unbelievable facility out here and the sound has been great for other events,” Ross said.

    “Their expenses were astronomical – $10,000 per night plus expenses,” Baughman commented. “It could have been done for half that cost.”

    “When they applied for this money, what were we thinking,” Councilman Larry Griffin asked. The audience and council laughed.

    “They were projecting a much larger audience,” Baughman said.

    Ross laid partial blame for the lack of attendance squarely on Ballard’s advertising choices.

    “They spent $1,100 on advertising in the Northeast News!” Ross grimaced. “I don’t know what the answer is, but I’m very disappointed that Sara Ballard is not here for us to at least be able to ask her some questions,” Ross said.

    Ballard stated in her final report that Bravo Blythewood took the hit for the loss.

    Bravo’s contribution to the event, Ballard stated in the final report, had been budgeted at $4,000; however, $20,140.65 was ultimately required to cover total expenses. Consequently, Bravo anted up $16,140.65 to cover that loss.

    A note on Bravo’s ‘budget to actual’ report states that Jones donated $2,000 in personal funds to cover certain checks written.

    Despite the five-digit financial losses, Ballard stated in her report to Council that Bravo Blythewood overwhelmingly believes the event contributed positively to the quality of life in the Blythewood community and has committed to hosting another series next year.

    That same commitment was not forthcoming from Council.

    “It would be hard for me to approve this kind of money for them again,” Baughman said.

    Jones could not be reached for comment.

  • Council prioritizes park projects

    BLYTHEWOOD – After meeting recently with the Doko Meadows Park Foundation, Town Administrator Brian Cook suggested Monday evening that council might want to discuss priorities for additional park features.

    Constructing an area in the park for a farmer’s market, Cook said, would most likely be the top priority and a close second might be sound baffling for the back of the amphitheater. Council generally agreed on both points, but the sound baffling received more discussion than the market.

    “Wasn’t the number for sound baffling something like $7,500?” Mayor J. Michael Ross asked Steve Hasterok, Events Director for the Manor.

    Councilman Eddie, who is a member of the Park Foundation, answered the question.

    “I don’t know about the price,” Baughman said, but he questioned the need for sound baffling at all. “Other than being outside, down by the lake, I was in here (the Manor) Saturday night and there was no issue in here with the music that was going on in the park. I couldn’t hear it.”

    Baughman also suggested that instead of the baffling being something that the park foundation pays for, perhaps the town would take on that cost.

    “After all, the town would benefit from the baffling because we would be able to rent both venues out at the same time – the amphitheater and the Manor – if we had the baffling,” Baughman said.

    “Actually, I would think that the greater problem we would have with two events at the same time would be parking more than the sound,” Ross said. “And are you saying that we put up the baffling and if the band was playing in the amphitheater, that you would not be able to hear it from outside the Manor?” Ross asked.

    No one on council was sure of the answer.

    “Maybe we’ll try to come up with a dollar figure for the baffling and see if we think that it’s worth the cost,” Cook said.

    “Whoever provides a bid, let us go and see exactly what they’ve done in the past and is it working.” Councilman Brian Franklin said. “If it doesn’t block enough of the sound, then that’s a lot of money to spend for nothing. You’re going to have a very angry bride when she hears that banjo playing.”

  • Mayor’s seat, 2 council seats open for November election

    BLYTHEWOOD – Three seats on Blythewood Town Council will be on the town’s election ballot Nov. 5 – two council seats and the mayor’s seat.

    Because the mayor’s seat has term limits, Mayor J. Michael Ross will not seek re-election.

    Councilman Eddie Baughman told The Voice that he will be seeking re-election. Councilman Malcolm Gordge, whose term is also up, said he will campaign to become the town’s next mayor.

    Whether running for a seat or voting for one, the following is information residents need to know to participate in the Nov. 5 town election.

    Filings for seats open at noon on Aug. 22 at Town Hall. Because Blythewood is not districted, the town’s candidates are at-large. Candidates will file by Statement of Candidacy.

    Filings close at noon, Sept. 6. Candidates must file Statements of Economic Interests electronically with the State Ethics Commission and paper copies with the Blythewood Town Clerk by 5 p.m. that day. Candidates are certified by the Richland County Election Commission.

    For residents who plan to vote in the November election, Oct. 5 is the last day to register to vote in person (9 a.m. – 12 p.m.) Oct. 6 is the last day to register to vote by fax/online (until 11:59 p.m.) Oct. 7 is the last day for a by-mail registration to be postmarked.

    Oct. 7 is also the day absentee ballots are available at Richland County Voter Registration office.

    The general election is held on Nov. 5. Winners are determined by non-partisan plurality method.

    For information call Blythewood Town Hall at 803-754-0501 or the Richland County Election Commission/Voter Registration at 803-929-6000.

  • Council to raise franchise fees

    BLYTHEWOOD – Mayor J. Michael Ross announced Friday morning that council is planning to raise the franchise fees that town residents pay on their power and water bills from the current three percent ($3 per $100) to five percent ($5 per $100).

    The revelation came during the public hearing section of a special meeting called to grant new 30-year non-exclusive franchise agreements to both Fairfield Electric Coop and Dominion Energy.

    Lake Ashley resident Edith Norris came to the meeting with questions about the fee.

    “I understand that this fee is collected on our light bill on behalf of the town and that Dominion and Fairfield Electric give this fee back to the town. Is that standard for all the town residents? How much does the town collect and what is that money used for?”

    Ross explained that the three percent franchise fee is across the board for all residents in the town and that the town collects franchise fees not just from the power companies, but from insurance companies, Winnsboro water service and other companies that do business in Blythewood.

    “This current agreement with the power companies has been in effect since 2001 – 18 years. And it’s remained the same, three percent,” Ross said.

    He explained that Fairfield Electric returns about $140,000 in fee collections annually to the town and Dominion returns about $70,000.

    “Since there is no taxation in Blythewood, this is one of the few revenue streams we have to operate with,” Ross said. “So all these fees usually go back into the general fund for operating the park, paying employees and other things since there is no tax millage,” he said.

    “It’s been three percent for 18 years, so it’s time to go up on the fee, like all the other municipalities have done. Things have gone up more than three percent over 18 years and we don’t have another way to raise money for operating expenses other than building permits and business licenses,” Ross said.

    “I understand, but how does a franchise fee differ from a tax?” Norris asked.

    “I don’t know,” Ross said, looking to town attorney Jim Meggs for guidance. “It’s just a word,” he said, shrugging.

    “It looks like a tax to me,” Meggs said.

    “Only the residents who live in the town limits pay the fee,” Norris said. “Before we annexed into the town, we didn’t pay this fee. So, it is a tax, but it’s called a fee.”

    “The town requires the power company to collect this fee,” Morgan Harrell representing Dominion, added. ”The power company doesn’t require the town to pay it.”

    Meggs weighed in with some clarity on the issue.

    “Under our state constitution, municipalities have authority over streets and rights of way inside the town limits. We even have some say about the Department of Transportation’s rights of way,” Meggs said. “The constitution requires that if people use the town’s streets’ right of way, they have to have a consent or franchise agreement with the town. It’s a traditional municipal thing across the state. Counties don’t have franchise authority, so you don’t pay fees in the county.”

    “I realize it’s a way of collecting tax,” Norris said, pressing the issue, “but a franchise fee can’t be deducted on my income tax. So why isn’t it called a tax?”

    “I don’t know,” Ross finally said. “It is what it is. It gives the town the money it needs to run the town.”

    While Norris said that because the town has grown it is therefore collecting more money in franchise fees even though the fee has not increased.

    Ross countered that there is more work to do and pay for when there are more people in the town. He said it is not final that the fee will be raised to five percent. He said it may only go up one percent.

    Harrell pointed out that the town can also raise or lower the fee at any time during the 30-year contract. The fee, she said, is not bound by the contract.

    Ross said the new fee will be finalized at second reading and that any change in the fee would go into effect Jan. 1, 2020.

  • Council passes $1,670,875 budget

    Mayor, Council Get Pay Raises Dec. 1

    BLYTHEWOOD – Town Council passed the first of two readings on its $1,670,875 FY 2020 budget Monday night, exceeding last year’s budget by $105,761.

    The only change to the town budget since the final workshop in early June is an $80,000 expense from the town’s hospitality fund for a SC Department of Transportation (SCDOT) project to add decorative, 8-foot high, black-coated safety fencing and sidewalks along each side of the Blythewood Road bridge over I-77.

    Reviewing the General Fund revenue, Cook said building permits and fees are projected at $180,679, down slightly from the $202,111 budgeted for 2019. Building and permit fees came in at $173,389 in 2017; $200,437 in 2018 and the actuals at the end of April were $150,565.

    Cook said fees for business licenses from both inside and outside the town are expected to be slightly higher than the current year, and that revenue for franchise fees next year is looking good, projected to be $273,457, up from $250,000 in 2019.

    Revenues and expenses for the governing body for 2020 are on par with 2019, Cook said. Total administration budget is projected to increase almost $45,000, going from $396,096 to $441,978, with almost $40,000 of that increase allocated for a 2.5 percent cost of living raise and a 3 percent merit increase for town employees.

    Administrative salaries are up about $10,500 over last year’s budget. Part of that increase is attributed to a 20 percent across the board raise for the mayor and council members. With the pay raise, the mayor will receive $10,800 annually and council members will each receive $7,200 annually.

    Mayor J. Michael Ross said he requested a $5,000 increase in community promotions from $7,500 to $12,500 for advertising and other promotions that he said might come up during the year that are not budgeted for.

    Costs for VC3, the Town’s computer software company, that Cook said maintains the town’s computer systems, will increase from $46,350 to $58,320. Some of that cost, he said, is a one-time cost that will go down some next year.

    In anticipation of updating the Town’s comprehensive plan, contracted services with the Central Midlands Council of Governments will increase from $20,000 to $35,000.

    The increase from $261,820 to $268,444 for Public Works is attributable to increased costs in contracted services for additional irrigation and landscape beautification projects in the Town. The Christmas committee also received an increase of $1,000 over 2019, and inspections and code enforcement expenses are expected to increase about $10,000.

    The budget for Parks and Recreation will be reduced by about $40,000 in 2020 due to an annual cost savings of $19,000 as the result of eliminating the park mowing contract and purchasing a mower for Town Hall to do the mowing in-house.

    Cook said there will be some increase in the Parks and Recreation budget, however, to allow for the purchase of a new piece of playground equipment and the addition of benches and possibly a shade in the playground area.

    Council addressed the Blythewood Chamber of Commerce’s financials at the May 23 meeting, and the Chamber declined to make its annual request a $17,500 economic development work subsidy (previously called a grant by town officials.) The chamber did however, ask for and receive $3,500 for an ‘elite partner’ chamber membership for the Town government at the premiere level.