Blog

  • Bond denied in Wilson murder/rape case

    Coleman was arrested in 44-year-old cold case in October

    FAIRFIELD COUNTY – Saying he represented a threat to the community, Judge Brian Gibbons denied bond to Charles Ugvine Coleman on Tuesday, who was arrested in October in connection with a 44-year-old cold case murder.

    Coleman

    The charges relate to the 1976 rape and murder of Chester’s Elizabeth Ann Howell Wilson, who disappeared while working a night shift at the Eureka Mill. Her dead, barely-clothed body was found in Fairfield County several hours after she never reported back to her station after a break.

    Sixth Circuit Assistant Solicitor Riley Maxwell presented the state’s case during a short bond hearing at the Fairfield County Courthouse. He recounted the day of Wilson’s disappearance from work at 4 a.m. on March 20. A witness had seen an unidentified black male in the parking lot that night and the car belonging to a plant manager was reported missing around the same time that Wilson disappeared. Within two hours of Wilson and the car disappearing, a vehicle with a body lying beside it was spotted by a passerby near the intersection of Ashford Ferry Road and Dave Jenkins Road in Blair. The body, later identified as being Wilson, was wearing only stockings and a top. There was an indication that she’d been raped and “brutally beaten to death,” Maxwell said. No arrest was ever made but her stockings and a towel in the car were taken as evidence and remained there until 2012. At that point, then-Chester County Sheriff Richard Smith began taking a look at some unsolved murders in Chester County, including that of Wilson. In the department evidence room there was some DNA evidence in the form of semen collected from the stockings and towel.

    “But DNA evidence wasn’t even a thing back then when it happened,” Smith said in October. “With modern technology, though, you’ve got a lot of new ways of solving stuff.”

    Smith said he had no idea why the items relative to the Wilson case continued to sit in the evidence room for 36 years. He submitted everything he found to the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) in hopes for “a hit.” At the time he did so, he discussed his decision with a member of Wilson’s family.

    According to his arrest record, Coleman was arrested in April of 2020 by the Union County Sheriff’s Office and charged with pointing and presenting a firearm and use of a firearm under the influence. A swab was taken and uploaded into the CODIS (Combined DNA Index System) national DNA database maintained by the FBI and the DNA came back with a match with evidence from this crime from 1976. Maxwell said the chance of the DNA belonging to anyone but Coleman was approximately one in 21 quintillion.

    Maxwell said the most recent arrest was far from being the only trouble Coleman had gotten into in his life. In 1977 he was arrested and eventually convicted of assault and battery with intent to kill for an incident in which he grabbed a woman standing alone talking on a payphone and tried to force her into a car. That was eerily similar to what happened to Wilson just a year before, Maxwell said.

    Ann Wilson

    A full SLED background check details incidents dating back 45 years.

    In 1975, Coleman was arrested by the Chester County Sheriff’s Office on charges of driving under the influence and operating a motor vehicle without a license. He was assessed a fine of $150. On September 24, 1976 (just six months after the murder of Wilson), he was charged with driving under suspension third offense and operating a motor vehicle while uninsured. He was convicted on both counts and was fined a total of $200. Charges of public drunk and disorderly conduct followed, but in 1977 came the assault and battery with intent to kill charges for which he was sentenced to 12 years in prison, but he was arrested again just four years later for DUI and leaving the scene of an accident. There is no indication he went to trial on those charges. In the years that followed he was charged with being drunk and disorderly on multiple occasions, resisting arrest, DUI, public drunk, multiple counts of public multiple instances of public disorderly conduct and shoplifting.

     Maxwell said there were a few other incidents that were either unresolved or had not led to conviction, including threatening a woman and allegedly assaulting two women at the Chester Motor Lodge.

    “It’s not like there was this incident in 1976 and he lived a pristine life since then,” Maxwell said. “He’s been a danger to the community since then.”

    It was also mentioned that at the time of Wilson’s murder, Coleman lived only about a mile away from where her body was found.

    Coleman’s attorney, Robert Fitzsimons, said his client is 65-years-old which would have made him 20 or 21 at the time of Wilson’s murder. It will take many months for the state to find possible witnesses, many of whom are either dead or have moved by now. Coleman does not have a lot of money, so his attorney asked for a low bond and said he was “entitled to be in the community.”

    “He’s on probation now and will be monitored…the case is  not going anywhere and he’s not going anywhere.”

    Surviving members of Wilson’s family asked to speak in court. Duke McWaters was married to Wilson’s daughter Pam for 42 years. He was a city police officer at the time and heard radio calls about a missing person. He went home to learn from his wife that it was her mother who was missing. He left to go back to the police department and was met by someone at the door who told him he needed to go to Fairfield County. When he got there, he was asked to identify his mother-in-law’s body. Even during a long law enforcement career in which he saw some jarring sights, he said he never saw anything like what was done to his mother-in-law.

    “It was one of the most heartless things I’ve ever seen,” he said.

    His family was left to live in fear and he was left without an answer to the daily question he wife asked him, “Who killed her?”

    The person responsible for killing Wilson has been out and living life for 44 years, he said, and he hoped that Gibbons would see fit to keep Coleman in jail until his trial.

    Ralph Mobley is still married to one of Wilson’s daughters (Sherri). He said the family had no idea the damage that had been done to her and that Wilson’s funeral was a closed-casket affair. He said he didn’t want his wife to have to worry for so long as she did in the wake of her mother’s death and begged Gibbons to deny bond. Sherri spoke as well, talking about how good a person her mother was and how much she did for others.

    “They took that away,” she said.

    She said she had prayed to God for 44 years that whoever was responsible would be found.

    Gibbons said the details of the case were horrific. He reminded all that this was not a determination of Coleman’s guilt or innocence, only a decision on whether or not he was entitled to a bond. A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty at trial he said. His determination was simply down to whether Coleman was a flight risk and whether or not he was a threat to the community. He judged him not to be a flight risk but said he did regard him as a threat.

    “Bond is respectfully denied,” he said.

    When he does go to trial, Coleman will be facing charges of rape and murder.

    Travis Jenkins is the Editor of the Chester News & Reporter.

  • WDPS investigates shooting on Garden St.

    WINNSBORO – The Winnsboro Department of Public Safety is looking for an assailant they say will be charged with assault and battery (weapon) for shooting a 31-year-old male.

    When WDPS officers responded to a shots-fired incident on Garden Street in Winnsboro at about 10:40 p.m. on December 11, they arrived to find a large crowd gathered in front of Wyman’s church. Nearby, a man was lying on the ground next to the back wheel on the passenger side of a green SUV.  Upon further inspection, officers determined that the he had been shot.

    Officers dispatched EMS who transferred the victim to the Providence Fairfield ER.

    The incident is being investigated by the Winnsboro Department of Public Safety. Anyone with information about the incident should contact the WDPS at 803-635-4511.

  • RC Council to hear rezoning request on Rimer Pond Road Thursday, Dec. 17

    To have input into the proposed rezoning of 15.14 acres for a housing development on Rimer Pond Road, emails must be received by Richland County Council by end of day, Wednesday, Dec. 16. Send emails to planningcommission@richlandcountysc.gov

    COLUMBIA – Richland County Council will hold a zoning public hearing on Thursday night, Dec. 17, to hear what residents who live and travel along Rimer Pond Road have to say about a rezoning request that will bring more traffic to the already congested road.

    At issue for residents who live and travel along the road is that Richland County Council continues to approve more housing developments along the road without addressing the increased traffic congestion these neighborhoods bring to the road.

    The latest rezoning-for-housing request on Rimer Pond Road was made earlier this month by developer Kevin Steelman who wants to rezone 15.14 acres for approximately 40 new homes. Stillman has already developed several neighborhoods with hundreds of homes to the Kelly Mill Road extension of Rimer Pond Road. Those neighborhoods empty on to Rimer Pond Road.

    The traffic from Steelman’s newly proposed neighborhood will also exit onto Rimer Pond Road along with vehicles from approximately 500 homes that are currently being built by Great Southern Homes behind Steelman’s 15.14 acres. Beside Steelman’s proposed neighborhood is Coopers Pond which already sends traffic onto Rimer Pond Road from more than 100 homes. These three neighborhoods are within a quarter mile of Highway 21 where, during drive times, traffic can back up a mile or more down Rimer Pond Road. A little further down the road, vehicles from another 150 or so homes in Eagles Glen empty onto Rimer Pond Road. Lake Carolina homes and a myriad of neighborhoods along Hardscrabble also travel down Rimer Pond Road to get to Highway 21 during high traffic hours. And a number of other new neighborhoods under construction will also empty onto the road.

    Public Restricted

    With restrictions on the public’s access to rezoning meetings during the pandemic, residents say they have little meaningful input to the county’s rezoning decisions that affect traffic on the road, leaving few if any barriers to the council’s passage of developers’ requests for rezoning.

    Earlier this month, when Steelman’s rezoning request went before the Richland County Planning Commission, the public was not allowed access to the meeting in person, nor were they able to view it virtually due to what a county spokesperson said were technical difficulties. Instead of postposing the vote until the public could have visual access to the meeting, the commission proceeded to vote 9-0 to recommend that county council approve the developer’s request.

    Media attorney Jay Bender termed the meeting illegal and said a ‘Do-Over’ was warranted.

    “While streaming did not allow for public viewing, the meeting was recorded and all efforts will be made to have the audio of the meeting…placed on the county’s YouTube channel,” Geonard Price, Division Manager/Zoning Administrator, said following the meeting in a texted comment to The Voice via Stephen Gilchrist, chairman of the planning commission.

    More than a week after the meeting, however, neither video nor audio of the meeting has been posted.

    While citizens were allowed to express their opinions about the rezoning in emails or letters to the planning commission, many expressed that they were not aware of the rezoning and therefore didn’t know to send an email.

    County officials said they posted signs and sent letters of notification about the rezoning to property owners adjacent to the proposed new housing development, However, the signs along Rimer Pond Road were posted facing the roadway and not easily visible to passing traffic. After a photo (below) was sent to the county showing motorists’ view of the signs, Price ordered the signs re-staked to be perpendicular to the road so that they could be easily seen by passing traffic.

    To view the county council zoom meeting which is scheduled for 7 p.m., on Thursday, Dec. 17, go to: http://richlandcountysc.gov/Government/County-Council

  • Winnsboro man arrested for kidnapping, assault

    WINNSBORO – A Winnsboro man was arrested Monday evening after he allegedly kidnapped one juvenile and assaulted another.

    Sheriff’s deputies responded to a home in the Sandcreek Hills subdivision after a caller reported a member of the family had assaulted a 13-year-old inside the residence and kidnapped a young child outside the home. It was reported the suspect took the child into a wooded area near the home.

    Deputies used tracking dogs to search the south Winnsboro area for about two hours.

    The child was subsequently located and returned to the family. The suspect was taken into custody and charged with kidnapping/abduction.

    The Voice is not identifying the suspect to protect the family’s identity.

  • RC planning commission holds meeting without the public

    Bender: The Meeting is Illegal and a ‘Do-Over’ is Warranted

    COLUMBIA – In a meeting Monday afternoon that turned out not to be accessible to the public, the Richland County Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend rezoning a 15.14 acre parcel on Rimer Pond Road from Rural (RU) to Low Density Residential (RS-LD) for a housing development proposed by developer Kevin Steelman.

    Due to COVID restrictions, the public was not allowed to attend the meeting, nor were they able to view it virtually due to what a county spokesperson said were technical difficulties. But the fact that the meeting was not accessible by the public didn’t stop the commission from voting.

    “While streaming did not allow for public viewing, the meeting was recorded and all efforts will be made to have the audio of the meeting…placed on the county’s YouTube channel,” Geonardo Price, manager over zoning for the county, said following the meeting in a texted comment to The Voice via Stephen Gilchrist, chairman of the planning commission.

    At press time on Wednesday, the audio had not yet been made available to the public.

    While the inaccessible meeting may satisfy Richland County officials, Bill Rogers, Executive Director of the S.C. Press Association, said it sounds like an illegal meeting.

    “If the public doesn’t have access to the meeting, then posting the audio later would not solve that problem,” Rogers said.

    “The public has to somehow have access to the meeting at the time it is happening. They must be allowed to either be present or have access online,” Rogers said. “If not, the county has two problems. If anyone wanted to challenge that vote, they’d probably win. Another problem is that it dilutes public confidence in the government.”

    Media attorney Jay Bender, who represents the S. C. Press Association, said the meeting should be rescheduled and the rezoning request re-voted.

    “If the public had no access because the doors were locked or the technology failed, I believe the meeting was in violation of the law,” Bender said. “The FOIA says all meetings shall be public. If there is no contemporaneous public access, the meeting is not public. A ‘do over’ is warranted.”

    Price told The Voice on Tuesday that the county does not plan to re-do the meeting.

    He said the process will move forward to the next regularly scheduled meeting which will be the zoning public hearing to be held in county council chambers via zoom at 7 p.m., Thursday, Dec. 17. At that meeting, county council members will take the first of three votes on the rezoning request. Residents can submit written comments to council that will be read into the record by a county employee.  Those comments must be emailed to planningcommission@richlandcountysc.gov It is the only other meeting concerning the rezoning where the public will be allowed to have input.

    While some residents along Rimer Pond Road have spoken out against more residential development along the road, many say the more worrisome issue is that there are already two large neighborhoods exiting onto the two-lane Rimer Pond Road within a stone’s throw from where the road intersects with Highway 21.

    “Traffic is a nightmare now at drive time,” Rimer Pond Road resident Trey Hair said. “The line of traffic sometimes backs up on Rimer Pond Road from Highway 21 for almost a mile. What will it be like when traffic from the additional 1,000 or so Great Southern Homes neighborhood and the 40 homes from the new neighborhood also enter onto Rimer Pond Road in the mornings? Traffic will be at a standstill. Council needs to solve the traffic congestion problem in that area before it creates more traffic,” Hair said. “But since we couldn’t hear the meeting, we don’t know if they addressed the issue or not. We were told that they unanimously voted to recommend the rezoning.”

    Information about the meeting is listed on signs posted at 167 Rimer Pond Road. The signs were reposted on Wednesday by the county to be more visible.

    A packet of complete information about the rezoning can be requested from Richland County Planning and Zoning at 803-576-2172.

    Written comments must be received by county council (planningcommission@richlandcountysc.gov) on or before Wednesday, Dec. 16.

  • BW mayor quarantines following exposure

    Family Members Test Positive for COVID-19

    BLYTHEWOOD – Blythewood Mayor Bryan Franklin has self-quarantined following two of his immediate family members testing positive for COVID-19. Town Councilman Donald Brock, made the announcement at the Blythewood tree lighting ceremony at Town Hall on Sunday evening,  where Brock stood in for the mayor as emcee of the event.

    “The Mayor came into close contact with a positive COVID family member,” Brock read from a prepared statement as the ceremony opened. “And while he tested negative, he is adhering to the CDC-recommended quarantine guidelines.”

    Franklin told the Voice Monday morning that after one of his children tested positive on Friday, the entire family was tested.

    “Another child, who shares a room with the infected child, has since tested positive,” Franklin said. He said that he and his wife and the remainder of their six children have tested negative.

    “As soon as we received the news that one of our children tested positive on Friday, I immediately self-quarantined for seven days in compliance with the CDC recommendations,” Franklin said. “If I am symptom free after that time, I am no longer required to quarantine under the new CDC guidelines. If I should experience symptoms within those seven days, then I would have to be tested again or quarantine for an additional 14 days,” he said.

    “Our entire family is certainly going to adhere to the CDC guidelines,” Franklin said. “I don’t want to expose anyone.”

    Franklin said that, barring symptoms, he expects to attend the town employee Christmas party on Dec. 11.

  • Ridgeway man dies of gunshot wounds

    RIDGEWAY – When Fairfield County Sheriff’s deputies responded to a call about a gunshot victim on Jewel Drive in Ridgeway on Sunday, Dec. 6, they entered a residence and found Christopher Antonio Curbeam, 49, lying on his back. The woman who reported the incident was kneeling over him with blood on her face and hands, the sheriff’s report stated. Deputies said the woman told then she had been attempting to give mouth to mouth resuscitation to the victim.

    Deputies cleared the residence and escorted the woman outside.

    The victim appeared to have at least one gunshot wound to the chest, and when EMS personnel arrived, they confirmed that the Curbeam was deceased, the report stated.

    Deputies reported damage to televisions and to a bedroom door as well as what appeared to be a gunshot hole in the wall above where the victim was lying.

    The woman was escorted to the Fairfield County Sheriff’s office for questioning. She was later turned over to the Chester County Sheriff who arrested her on unrelated charges.

    The Fairfield County Sheriff’s office continues to investigate the incident.

  • Rezoning for housing requested on Rimer Pond Rd.

    COLUMBIA – Another housing development is being proposed on Rimer Pond Road.

    A 15.14 acre Rural (RU) zoned parcel located on Rimer Pond Road not far from the intersection with Highway 21 will be brought before the Richland County Planning Commission for rezoning at 3 p.m., on Monday, Dec. 7.

    Developer Kevin Steelman is requesting the parcel be rezoned to RS-LD (Residential Low Density.) The site is adjacent to another residential neighborhood that is currently being developed by Great Southern Homes and next to the Cooper’s Pond subdivision. All three neighborhoods will exit on to Rimer Pond Road near where it intersects with Highway 21.

    The site is surrounded on three sides by Rural zoning and on one side by Planned Development zoning. 

    According to the county planning staff, the 2019 SCDOT traffic count Station 705 located east of the site on Rimer Pond Road identifies 6,100 Average Daily Trips (ADTs). Rimer Pond Road is classified as a two lane undivided major collector, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 8,600 ADTs. This section of Rimer Pond Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) ‘8.’

    According to staff, there are no planned or programed improvements for this section of Rimer Pond Road through the County Penny Sales Tax program or through SCDOT.

    The county planning staff recommends approval of a zoning change from RU to RS-LD.

    A zoning public hearing will be held by County Council on Dec. 17, 2020. Citizens can speak for or against the rezoning at both the Planning Commission meeting on Dec. 7 and the Dec. 17 public hearing. Both meetings will be held at 2020 Hampton St. in Columbia.

  • Dominion seeks rate hike; more control over customers’ properties

    In 2018, S.C. legislators cut a deal with Dominion Energy to buy SCANA, and customers were promised a 15 percent cut in their utility rates. Now – two years later – Dominion is asking to raise its rates on customers by almost 8 percent.

    Dominion customers received a notice that the first of three public hearings would be held Monday, Nov. 9. The notice informed them that they could testify if they registered between Oct. 5 and Nov 9.

    The problem is that customers didn’t receive the PSC’s notice until around Oct 21 – two-and-a-half weeks after the first day of registration. Also, the notice was complicated and highly unlikely to be understood by anyone outside the energy industry and state regulators.

    Most customers would likely have to do some time-consuming research to fully understand the proposal, much less be prepared to testify about it.

    Below is a summary that outlines (and translates) what the notice actually means for Dominion customers.

    What does the notice tell ratepayers?

    The PSC notice says:

    [This is the first sentence of the notice] “DESC has not sought a rate increase for base electric rates since 2012 exclusive of the changes in the fuel component and recovery of costs and revenues associated with demand side management and energy efficiency programs and other rider-based charges.”

    Translation: “DESC” means Dominion Energy South Carolina – which has not been delivering service in South Carolina since 2012, but rather since 2019. Technically, anything prior to 2019 refers to an action taken by SCANA, the former owner of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G).  

    “Base electric rate” is the rate at which customers are charged for power before other “programs” and costs are added.

    “…(E)xclusive of changes in the fuel component and recovery of costs,” etc. That means simply that SCANA (now Dominion), has in fact adjusted rates, which include increases, since 2012. 

    “(F)uel component” is the cost paid by customers for Dominion’s purchase of fuel, which can change each year

    “(D)emand side management” are programs urging customers to reduce energy consumption, including:

    • an online store that sells special lightbulbs and other energy-efficient products. Dominion charges customers to purchase these products while also charging customers a fee on their bills
    • offering cash back for customers who recycle their old refrigerators
    • rebates for buying and installing certain energy-efficient equipment

    special appointments with Dominion’s agents to discuss power use and get suggestions on how cut the cost of energy use.

    “(E)nergy efficient programs” appears to be the same as demand side management, not a separate program

    “(O)ther rider-based charges” means special programs and charges that are tacked on to a customer’s bill

    Each of these are examples of potential rising costs that customers could have paid over the years, depending on what was requested and approved by the PSC. The notice also ignores the fact that customers saw constant rate hikes resulting from the failed V.C. Summer nuclear project until those rates were slashed in 2018.

    Regardless of the wording, customer power bills did increase within that time, and Dominion wants another rate increase of almost 8 percent.

    The PSC notice says:

    “[Dominion has] made continued investment in assets and operating resources required to serve an expanding customer base…”. Dominion claims it has made those investments to “maintain safety, reliability and efficiency,” and to “meet increasingly stringent reliability, security and environmental requirements.”

    Also, Dominion has “experienced an increase in depreciation expense and property tax associated with these investments.”

    Translation: Dominion is spending more money than it used to in order to provide electric service.

    These expenses include purchasing new equipment like transformers and power lines, along with a greater tax burden due to new land and facilities. The age of these assets has an effect on their financial statements and may reduce how much can be written off as a tax deduction.

    These claims are paired with their argument that electric bills haven’t increased in roughly eight years, despite customers being charged varying amounts for special programs and paying more for the failed V.C. Summer project.  

    New charges and rule changes

    On top of charging customers more for basic electric service, Dominion wants to introduce new program costs, remove a customer discount, and make serious changes to their terms of service.

    “A vegetation management accrual system to establish a stable basis for funding the vegetation control plans…” means the company wants to charge customers extra for the cost of cutting down trees and trimming vegetation, often on customers’ private property.

    “To restore the collection of the Storm Damage Reserve component of rates” means there was once a fee charged for the cost of saving money in a reserve to cover storm damage…and they want to put it back in.

    “To discontinue the Tax Rider authorized in 2018 to return savings under (federal tax cut) to customers.” Dominion claims these savings (a clearly marked 3.07% discount applied to each power bill) will be returned to customers through their rates going forward. But by making them invisible, there’s no way to know exactly how the savings are being applied, and Dominion did not clarify how long they will last.

    In addition, Dominion wants to “make certain changes in its General Terms and Conditions, which is supposed to serve as the agreement with customers, but really customers have no choice but to accept those terms…if they want power.

    The changes are not explained, and anyone who wants the specifics has to read Dominion’s lengthy application. The proposed changes include: 

    • to allow Dominion to shut off the power of someone who makes a “direct or implied threat” against workers or the company itself. Those terms aren’t defined, and Dominion does not explain how turning off the power resolves any concerns regarding the alleged threat. There is no apparent process to determine if the threat is credible, nor any path to restore power to the customer. If a customer manages to get their power turned back on, they must pay a $25 reconnection charge.
    • to allow Dominion to charge customers for special equipment if they are operating such things as a tankless electric water heater, an electric vehicle charger, a solar panel — and they want to eliminate the requirement that installation charges be “reasonable.”

    Hearings held two weeks ago

    The Public Service Commission held public hearings on the rate request two weeks ago, but commissioners have no direct accountability to the public. Rather, it is legislators – who routinely evaluate each commissioner – that bear responsibility for the condition of South Carolina’s energy industry.

    In fact, the only people who are directly accountable to customers of regulated utilities are their House members and their Senators. As long as legislators maintain control over the energy system and its regulators, there cannot be a system that listens to and serves the public.

    The South Carolina Policy Council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state of South Carolina.

  • Baby killed in Blackstock crash

    BLACKSTOCK – A baby died in a single-car crash in Fairfield County on Thursday, Nov. 19, that left two others injured.

    Malayah Kelly

    The crash happened around 12:40 p.m. on U.S. Highway 321 near Plum Lane, about a mile south of Blackstock, according to South Carolina Highway Patrol officer Gary Miller.

    Officials said the driver of a 2009 Toyota Camry was traveling north on Hwy 321 when the car went off the right side of the road, hit an embankment, overturned and struck a tree.

    The driver, 20, of Ridgeway, and a child sitting in the right front seat were injured and taken to the hospital. Both were seat-belted.

    On Friday, Nov. 20, the Fairfield County Coroner’s Office confirmed a baby who was in the backseat of the car was killed.

    Malayah Ivory Kelly, 11 months old, died at the scene, the coroner said.

    The collision is being investigated by the South Carolina Highway Patrol and the Fairfield County Coroner’s Office.

    A GoFundMe link has been set up to help the family with expenses following the crash.