Blog

  • Woman shot outside bar on Fairfield Road

    COLUMBIA – A Richland County Sheriff’s incident report provided few details about the shooting.  Deputies said they responded to Felicity’s Bar and Grill at 7708 Fairfield Road.

    Joyel T. Snell, 45, of Fort Meyers, FL, was lying in front of the bar where she had been shot in the upper body, according to officers. She was taken by EMS to a local hospital where she died.

    WACH Columbia reported that the owner of Felicity Bar & Grill, Derrick Harris, is speaking out about the deadly shooting.

    According to WACH, the shooting started when a group of men were not allowed inside the building because of a previous incident. The report stated that the men circled the parking lot a couple times then drove onto Fairfield Road and did a drive-by shooting.

    Harris told the news station that the entire incident was caught on security cameras installed at the business, but not the cameras installed by the Richland County Sheriff’s Department to keep the area safe.

    Anyone with information is asked to submit a tip to Crime Stoppers at crimesc.com.

  • Council, residents accuse Bell of shutting them out, rushing redistricting

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County scheduled Monday night’s public hearing on redistricting hoping to quell recent complaints of secrecy and personal politics.

    Instead, more evidence arose illustrating that the proposed plan to redraw district lines may be politically motivated.

    One proposed change shifts the street of a potential challenger of Council Chairman Moses Bell, ceding it from District 1 to District 5.

    Bell lives in District 1, the same as Ridgeway resident Randy Bright, a frequent critic of the current administration who’s been politically active for years.

    Bright called the proposed district lines “very odd,” though he stopped short of accusing Bell of gerrymandering.

    Randy Bright, who has talked about running for Bell’s District 1 seat, points to map where Bell drew him (Bright) out of Bell’s district. | Barbara Ball

    “This little sliver was pulled out of its community, out of its natural boundaries. It’s a stark change – we were in District 1 – everything around us is District 1,” Bright said. “This is basically one street. I find that very odd, that one sliver.”

    Winnsboro resident Brandon Peake was more direct in thinking the proposed maps were politically motivated.

    Peake referenced recent council votes appropriating $500,000 for parks and playgrounds as well as approving the controversial Teacher Village housing development pushed by the school district.

    “With $500,000 in one district [for parks] and the Teacher Village in another, it seems pretty apparent that they are trying to appease your agenda,” Peake said.

    Bell pushed back against the criticisms. He restated talking points from the last council meeting, where he said the proposed map follows state and federal laws, and is more equitable than the current map.

    “When you look at the total picture of these lines, they are significantly improved over 2011 [redistricting] with only 15 census blocks moved, which is a significant feat in itself,” Bell said. “This is really, really good.”

    Who’s moving where

    Fairfield County Council has already passed two readings of the redistricting plan. No votes were taken Monday night, though final reading could come as soon as Monday, Dec. 13 even though the federal deadline is March 1, 2022.

    Federal law requires county governments to redraw district lines every 10 years, after census numbers are released.

    Redistricting is also necessary because of routine population shifts. Since 2010, Fairfield County as a whole lost about 3,000 residents, shrinking 15.6%, according to the S.C. of Revenue and Fiscal Affairs office.

    District 2 grew 7.1% while District 7 shrank 8.7%, the agency has said.

    Federal law requires no more than 5% deviation in any council district, which means some precincts must move from one district to another to compensate for population shifts.

    Revenue and Fiscal Affairs director Frank Rainwater said only 15 of the county’s 1,200 blocks shifted.

    In District 1, one precinct moves into District 2 and three precincts shift to District 3, according to the proposed map.

    District 2 loses two blocks to District 3, one to District 6 and another to District 7.

    A precinct in District 3 moves to District 5, while District 5 loses three precincts – two to District 3 and two to District 7, the proposal shows.

    “Your overall deviation is down to 5%. You have many districts that are down to 1% of the target,” Rainwater said.

    Bell boasted that the proposed map brings the county into compliance with very few changes required to the district lines.

    “It’s a significant change in the deviation which makes it a significant improvement in the lines,” Bell said.

    Rainwater later acknowledged he discussed the proposed map only with Chairman Bell. He said it’s normal for the state to deal with one person, but he was also unaware that other council members had no input.

    “Mr. Rainwater, when you talk about two blocks moved from one district to another, who’s responsible for the moving of those blocks?” Councilman Doug Pauley asked. “Who decides what blocks move from one district to the next?”

    Councilman Doug Pauley accused Chairman Moses Bell of not involving public in redistricting process.

    “Those were conversations we had with Mr. Bell,” Rainwater said.

    “Did you have any conversation with any other council members?” Pauley inquired.

    “No sir,” Rainwater responded.

    Councilman Clarence Gilbert pressed as well.

    “When you were given this draft, were you under the impression all of the council members had been a part of this?” Gilbert asked.

    “I had no knowledge about who talked about it. I don’t know who [Bell] did or did not talk to,” Rainwater answered.

    In an email of the draft redistricting map sent Bell on Monday and copied to all council members, Rainwater wrote, “Again, the draft map is based on the direction you (Bell) provided and is intended for you to share with council and the public for feedback.”

    Lack of transparency

    On Monday, transparency issues continued to dog Bell, with council members and residents accusing him of shutting them out of the process.

    Pauley said Bell instructed staff not to stream the public forum online, which is the customary practice for council meetings. Bell denied that.

    “For some reason tonight, Mr. Bell does not want to have this meeting live,” Pauley said.

    Bell said it wasn’t feasible for the county, which operates on a $44.6 million budget, to broadcast the meeting live.

    “We’re not prepared to do a live meeting. We’re not prepared to do that,” Bell said.

    On short notice, a representative of The Voice was able to broadcast the proceedings live on Facebook using a smart phone.

    Pauley also said Bell didn’t adequately publicize the public forum.

    Waving a copy of the Country Chronicle, which generally publishes stories favorable to the current administration, Bell stated the county did publish a public notice in that newspaper to announce Monday’s forum.

    “We did put it in the paper, so we did advertise,” Bell said.

    The county did not advertise the forum in The Voice, which is mailed directly to more than 4,000 homes in Fairfield County.

  • Duke enhances recreation at Lake Wateree

    Duke Energy and Fairfield County officials cut the ribbon on a new public recreation access area on Lake Wateree on Friday, Dec. 4. The enhancement makes Molly’s Creek the largest recreation access area in the company’s history.

    LAKE WATEREE – Duke Energy cut the ribbon on a new public recreation access area on Lake Wateree on Friday, Dec. 4.  It is the largest recreation access area in the company’s history and one of four planned for the Fairfield side of the Lake.

    These improvements are part of ongoing efforts to ensure quality recreation access areas are available for public use on Duke Energy-managed lakes. These investments are a result of commitments made by Duke Energy, Fairfield County and 69 other stakeholders in the Comprehensive Re-licensing Agreement signed in 2006 and required by the company’s hydroelectric operating license the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued in 2015.

    The Molly Creek Access Area is located at 604 Island Road in Fairfield.

    Photo provided by Duke Energy
  • Crash on Smallstown Road takes life of Winnsboro man

    WINNSBORO – A pedestrian was killed Friday night as he attempted to cross Smallstown Road in Winnsboro after checking his mailbox.

    The crash occurred at about 6 p.m., Friday evening, about a mile from Richard Winn Academy, according to officials.

    Fairfield County Coroner Chris Hill has identified the deceased as Mark Small, Sr., 72.

    According to Master Trooper Gary Miller with the S.C. Highway Patrol, a 2017 GMC truck driven by Roxie Woodard was traveling north on Smallstown Road when the crash occurred near the intersection with Swallow Lane. Small died at the scene, according to the report.

    The driver of the pickup stopped after the crash. Both the driver of the pickup truck and a passenger were seat belted and not injured.

    The crash is under investigation by the S.C. Highway Patrol.


    This story was updated December 6, 2021 at 2:46 p.m.

  • One person killed in Blythewood crash

    BLYTHEWOOD – A single vehicle crash has taken the life of a motorcyclist in Blythewood.

    The crash happened about 6:45 p.m., Thursday night on Branham Road at the intersection with Sandfield Road.

    According to S.C. Highway Patrol Master Trooper David Jones, a 2014 Harley Davidson motorcycle was traveling East on Sandfield Road when it came up on the intersection with Branham Road, drove across Branham and struck a ditch.

    The driver, who was not wearing a helmet, died at the scene.

    The Coroner has not yet released the name of the deceased.

    The collision remains under investigation by the S.C. Highway Patrol.

  • One fatality in Winnboro crash

    WINNSBORO – A two vehicle collision in Winnsboro on Thursday has resulted in one fatality.

    The crash occurred at about 12 noon Thursday, Dec. 2, at the intersection of High Street and Park Lane.

    Chief John Seibles of the Winnsboro Department of Public Safety reported that the crash involved a small city mail truck and a small pickup truck.

    Fairfield County Coroner Chris Hill is releasing the name of Lou Ann Williams, age 33, of Columbia, SC who died after the mail truck she was driving collided with another vehicle. Ms. Williams was transported by EMS to MUSC Fairfield, where she was pronounced deceased.

    There is no information as to the cause of the crash or whether there were injuries to other persons involved. The accident remains under investigation by Fairfield County Coroner’s Office and Winnsboro Public Safety.


    Story updated Dec. 4, 2021 at 1:13 p.m.

  • Pushback over redistricting secrecy prompts public comment meeting

    WINNSBORO – County council pushed through first and second readings (5-2) on a redistricting plan for Fairfield County in less than a week and without public discussion or a public forum on the plan.

    At the Nov. 22 council meeting, Councilman Douglas Pauley accused Chairman Moses Bell of unilaterally submitting a draft plan without informing council members or the public.

    Victor Frontroth, a cartographer with the S. C. Revenue and Fiscal Affairs office, attended the Nov. 22 council meeting to explain the redistricting process, but there were no maps to present for the public. Frontroth said repeatedly during the meeting that feedback from council members and the public is crucial to every redistricting plan.

    “Public input is a very important part of this entire process,” Frontroth said, adding that a public hearing is required before third (final) reading.

    While Bell had emailed a draft map of his plan for redistricting to council members, there were few roads identified, making it difficult to determine how specific properties were affected.

    It didn’t take long for Bell’s plan to come under attack, with many citing concerns over lack of transparency and the lack of the opportunity for input from all councilmen.

    “The map that was presented to you, where did that map come from?” Pauley asked Frontroth.

    “That was from working with Chairman Bell,” Frontroth answered.

    “Wouldn’t you agree to have seven council members, that every council member should have a say in that draft?” Pauley asked.

    “We were under the impression that every council member was aware,” Frontroth replied.

    “They were not,” Pauley responded.

    “They were not,” Councilman Gilbert echoed.

    A letter dated Nov. 23, 2021, to Bell from Frank Rainwater, executive director of the S.C. Revenue and Fiscal Affairs office confirmed as much.

    “The Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office (RFA) computed statistics and created a draft map based on the direction you (Bell) provided as we shared and discussed with you on November 17,” Rainwater wrote.

    Bell’s assurances that his plan would meet constitutional requirements did little to sway angry residents who voiced frustration over being shut out of the redistricting process.

    District 4 resident John Jones said during public comment at the Nov 22 council meeting that the county website is virtually devoid of any maps or detailed redistricting plans.

    Jones feared the council majority’s endgame was gerrymandering, the manipulation of district boundaries to give one or more council members an unfair electoral edge.

    “That’s not right, that’s not ethical,” Jones said.

    Ridgeway resident Randy Bright said the lack of transparency over redistricting is indicative of the secrecy that surrounded budget talks, employee bonuses and other recent measures.

    The day after the meeting, Bell sent the following email to council members and the media:

    “We are scheduling a public forum on Dec. 6 at 6 p.m., to discuss the proposed redistricting map and the statistics that support the proposed map, purpose of districting, and public input. One of the reasons we want to have this forum is that we need for folks to understand the process and to review the proposed map along with the stats. Look forward to seeing you then. Forget the assumptions,” Bell wrote.

    That meeting is scheduled to be held in council chambers. The public is invited to attend.

    Pauley emailed the other council members about the need to provide the public with information prior to that meeting.

    “I wanted to say if there is going to be a public hearing on Dec. 6, 2021 for redistricting, then we need to send out something soon so the public has time to plan for it.”

    He also included a link (www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzOS4L8kwR8) of a redistricting in another county, “so we can see how it was done. They had 2 public hearings and the board offered 3 different maps to choose from and present to the public. It seems they took the time and made sure the public had a chance to express their input,” he wrote.

    “The public is supposed to be a part of this,” Pauley told The Voice, “a big part. It’s not something Mr. Bell is supposed to work out to his satisfaction with no input from the rest of council and the public.”

  • Former R2 superintendent sued by LR5 trustees

    IRMO – A former superintendent of Richland Two and other Midlands area school districts was “politically motivated” when he filed a complaint against a former employer, according to a recently filed lawsuit.

    On November 10, Lexington-Richland 5 filed suit against Dr. Steve Hefner, seeking unspecified “actual, consequential and punitive damages,” as well as court costs and attorney’s fees.

    A response to the suit had not been filed as of late Tuesday.

    Hefner served as superintendent of the Richland Two school district from 1994-2010, and also superintendent of Lexington-Richland 5 from 2011-2018. He was named State Superintendent of the Year in 2002 and 2015.

    But it’s more recent activity that prompted Lexington-Richland 5 to sue the retired superintendent.

    According to the litigation, Hefner “intentionally interfered with the lawful contract” that Lexington-Richland 5 inked with HeartEd, LLC, an agency that provides interim superintendent services.

    “Hefner’s interference was unjustified and malicious, justifying the award of punitive damages,” the suit states. “As a result of Hefner’s malicious interference, the District has been damaged.”

    Those damages include “injury to reputation, loss of goodwill in the community, [and] loss of the economic benefit gained by the employment relationship between the District and HeartEd.”

    Lastly, the suit states the district incurred added legal costs and risks losing state funding due to potentially losing students.

    The lawsuit comes on the heels of another superintendent controversy relating to Lexington-Richland 5.

    In June, Dr. Christina Melton, the district’s immediate past superintendent, abruptly resigned weeks after being named State Superintendent of the Year. She succeeded Hefner as superintendent after he retired.

    Melton’s sudden departure prompted the resignation of former Lexington-Richland 5 board member Ed White.

    In a prepared statement, White stated that the board forced Melton to resign, according to documents included in the agenda packet for the board’s June 28 meeting.

    “My fellow Board members signed a secret settlement agreement with Dr. Melton to terminate the Superintendent’s Contract without a public vote,” White’s statement said.

    “They wanted to present the false façade that she had resigned and keep it from the public until after the school year adjourned, ostensibly to avoid the criticism they would receive for their actions,” the statement continued.

    On June 28, the Lexington-Richland 5 board voted to censure White over his remarks, board records show.

    As to the lawsuit, which doesn’t detail the circumstances of Melton’s departure, the district contracted with HeartEd to provide interim superintendent services. Doing so would save the district $65,000 a year, the lawsuit states.

    In August, after becoming aware of the contract, Hefner filed a complaint with Cognia, the district’s accrediting agency.

    Hefner’s complaint included false information and defamatory statements, according to the district’s lawsuit.

    District attorneys wrote Hefner, demanding that he retract the complaint and issue an apology, but he never did, the suit states.

    Meantime, Cognia was dismissive of Hefner’s complaint, saying complaints the agency receives “are often politically motivated,” according to the suit.

    “Hefner’s motivation in intentionally interfering with the contract between HeartEd and the District is wrongful, malicious and politically motivated,” the suit states.

  • Eagle boys split games in season openers, girls pick up first win

    WINNSBORO – Richard Winn opened regular season play at home on Nov. 23 against Ragin Prep.

    Up 20-0 after one quarter of play, the Eagles flexed their early-season muscles and extended the lead to 46-6 at the half and went on to take a 69-9 final win. 

    Landon Caulder looks to pass under Ragin Prep pressure. | Millie Lambert

    Sophomore Drew Spires led scorers with 23 points. Ethan Steward added 8. Juniors Rob Wilson and Lawson Wade each had 7. Wilson had 7 steals and junior Landon Caulder had 9 rebounds.

    The Eagles found a more formidable opponent on Monday at Whitmire High School.

    Richard Winn led 29-25 at halftime, but Whitmire’s 19-8 third quarter put them on top, where they remained for a 57-50 final, giving the Eagles their first loss of the season.

    Wade led scorers with 23 points. Caulder added 9 and Spires tallied 8. Spires had 12 rebounds and Wade added 8 rebounds, 4 assists and a steal.

    The Lady Eagles defeated Whitmire 37-18 in the team’s first outing under new head coach Emily McElveen.

    Sophomore Brinson Baker led scorers with 14 points, followed by eighth grader Abby Lewis with 7 and senior Mikaela Miller with 6.

    The Eagles return only one senior to each varsity team, Edward Clement and Mikaela Miller.

    Richard Winn will host Lake Pointe Academy on Friday.

  • Rosborough arrested for murder/non-negligent manslaughter of son

    Brother of shooter: “This is not who she was. She was a wonderful, loving mother.”

    FAIRFIELD COUNTY – Fairfield County and Chester County Sheriff’s deputies were called to an address on Old Douglas Road near Blackstock on the evening of Thanksgiving Day, in reference to a six-year-old gunshot victim. Upon arrival, deputies learned that a six-year-old boy had been shot by his mother and that he had been transported to a hospital in Chester by family members. The boy later died, according to Fairfield County Sheriff Will Montgomery.

    Rosborough

    Mary Amelia Rosborough, 31, was arrested and is in the Fairfield County Detention Center charged with murder/non-negligent manslaughter, according to officials.

    Montgomery told The Voice that at about 6 p.m., Rosborough, the boy’s mother, had returned from hunting, was carrying her gun, went into her room to change clothes and shot her son in the upper body.

    According to the incident report, Rosborough’s brother, Will, rushed toward the room as Amelia Rosborough was coming out with the gun breached as she was trying to reload. Will Rosborough tackled his sister and restrained her until deputies arrived.

    According to the incident report, Will Rosborough stated that while he was wrestling his sister, “she made a statement something to the effect that she wanted to send the victim to heaven.”

    According to deputies, Rosborough said that there were no indicators of any behavioral change that would lead anyone to think that Amelia Rosborough would shoot her son.

    The mother and son were residents of Chester.

    Montgomery has not yet released a motive for the shooting.

    In an exclusive interview with The Voice, Will Rosborough said his sister, a single mom, had some issues, but had been trying unsuccessfully to get help.

    “She was trying to resolve her issues,” he said. “This was not something we expected would happen. It was the most unexpected tragedy I could have ever imagined. Nothing was going on to make this happen. Nothing was wrong.

    “She and my daddy had been deer hunting and she killed a doe. She got home and everything seemed fine. Then it happened,” Will Rosborough said of the shooting.

    “She was not a bad girl. She was sweet, and loves that boy. [Christmas] presents come in the mail every day that she ordered for him. She was trying to get help. We just didn’t know how bad her issues were.”

    Will Rosborough also remembered his 6-year-old nephew, who he identified as Jase Wise. Rosborough said he cherished the boy.

    “Jase was such a sweet little boy, sweet and loving, happy. What a loving little guy he was, sweetest little thing,” Will Rosborough said.

    “I can’t help being angry about what happened,” he said. “Our family is devastated, but that was not Amelia. That was not her. She was a loving daughter, sister and mother. I can’t explain what happened.”

    The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division is assisting in the investigation of the shooting, according to Montgomery.

    This is a developing story and details will be posted as soon as they are made available.


    A mugshot for Rosborough has not been made available. Photo was provided by family.