Blog

  • Second Zion Hill meeting set for Sept. 10

    WINNSBORO – After a well-attended community meeting last month, facilitated by the Central Midlands Council of Goverments (CMCOG) to assess the needs of the Zion Hill and Fortune Springs Park neighborhoods, CMCOG is ready to present residents a draft plan for meeting those needs.

    The community meeting will be held at the Fairfield High Alumni Building on Tuesday, Sept. 10, at 7 p.m. in the school cafeteria.

    Gregory Sprouse, Director of Research, Planning and Development for CMCOG and planner John Newman along with Chris Clauson, Fairfield County Community Development Director, as well as county, city and school officials will be on hand to talk with residents.

    The meeting in July was initiated to encourage residents to voice what they think is wrong with their neighborhood and what they want changed.

    “We wanted to find out from the residents what’s going on, what are the issues, the opportunities, the challenges,” Clauson said. “We wanted to hear about traffic issues, infrastructure problems, lighting, town services, transportation (transit), public safety and issues with health and education. Our goal is to pair them up with potential grant funds to fix the problems.”

    During the course of that meeting, residents began to pour out their worries and frustrations, including what they perceived to be poor code enforcement, the inaccessibility of Zion Park, poor responses from the Sheriff’s department and town hall and nothing being done about houses falling into disrepair.

    According to Sprouse, the draft plan to be presented at the Sept. 10 meeting will be the next step in identifying community needs, project ideas and potential grant funding opportunities to meet those needs and to give life to the project ideas that members of the two communities brought to the table in July.

    While the meeting will focus on the needs of the Zion Hill and Fortune Springs Park area, the public is invited to attend.

    The Fairfield High Alumni Building is located at 403 Fairfield Street in Winnsboro. For information about the meeting, contact Sprouse at 803-744-5158.

  • State Champs reunite after 50 years

    The 1969 Winnsboro High School Wildcat football players return to their high school turf and their glory days after 50 years. | Photos: Martha Ladd

    WINNSBORO – Celebrating the big 5-0 anniversary of their 1969 AA football state championship title, a group of former Winnsboro Wildcats gathered this past weekend at the Fairfield County Career and Technology Center and McLendon Stadium to reunion with former teammates, coaches, and cheerleaders, rekindle old friendships, and relive their beloved glory days.

    A half century has come and gone since this group of former Winnsboro HS athletes strapped on their football gear to represent Winnsboro in the AA state title matchup against defending State Champion Strom Thurmond HS, but the stories of their road to reach that narrow 15-14 victory to earn the state title still live on in the hearts and minds of these somewhat now “tamed” Wildcats.

    An interesting piece of trivia is that the 1969 Wildcat team is the only Winnsboro team to have captured a state title on the home gridiron turf of E.K. McLendon Stadium, now having been recently replaced by astroturf in the newly renovated stadium.

    Of the 35 player roster, 23 eagerly returned to the field where it all happened. One former player, Thomas Murphy, made the longest trek back from his home in San Antonio, Texas. In addition to the former players, spouses, and other family members in attendance were former assistant coaches Eddie Raines and Wayne Sibbett, trainers Ben Foster and Charlie Freeman, and cheerleaders Lucy Coleman McCoy and Virginia (Tutta) Stevenson Startsman.

    Many of the tales told over the weekend naturally included reference to Principal Ed McLendon and head coach Joe Turbeville. McLendon, affectionately nicknamed Coach Mac, started the football program’s rise to greatness before accepting the job as WHS principal and handing over the head coaching job to Turbeville.

    Remembered and admired as one of the all-time great high school coaches in South Carolina, Turbeville passed away in January 2016 after finishing his 31 year coaching career with five state titles to his credit. Unfortunately, there are also seven members of the 1969 championship team who are deceased – Chuck Edenfield, Randy Flanders, Johnny Geddings, Ronnie Hornsby, Johnny Nelson, Ricky Rutland, and Henry White.

    Buddy Poole

    Spear-headed by Robert Sharpe and Ellis Johnson, the group came together to enjoy a BBQ dinner on Friday evening prior to the FCHS Griffins’ home opener and swap stories of what each remembered about the momentous football season. However, lengthy weather delays and continued rainy conditions of the 7:30 pm game kickoff discouraged many of the former state champs group from attending the game. However, most returned for Saturday’s brunch, a tour of the new Griffin field house given by Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green, and a group photo opportunity at McLendon Stadium.

    Building on Coach Turbeville’s motto “Work Wins,” everyone agreed that Turbeville was an incredible coach who, in three years as head coach there so far, only lost 4 games. Additionally it was noted that the ‘69 team was fortunate to build on the prior Wildcat teams’ success. When asked what made this team so special, Robert Sharpe replied, “We all came together as good friends,” and Robert Wood added, “Good leadership from the seniors.”

    In addition to the great plays and occasional mishaps on the field, there were also memories shared about the locker room and bus rides. Larry Irby seemed surprised that players recalled him singing Chuck Berry’s hit song “Nadine” on the bus rides and giving weather reports, and Frank Barwick is remembered for always singing Johnny Cash songs. Lucy Coleman McCoy reminded the group that Coach Turbeville was not happy that the cheerleaders rode on the same bus with the players and enforced a “No Talking” rule.

    According to the players, Turbeville was known for putting in new plays each week. One particular week he put in one he named “watermelon.”  On that play, Will Pope, one of the largest Wildcats on the roster, broke free with the ball, and a tackler half his size rode piggy back down the field until a teammate could assist with bringing Pope down.  

    Starting quarterback Luncford Bass made apologies 50 years later to his center Robert Sharpe for mixing up his signal calling to Sharpe and for asking him to open an offensive hole and do battle against Whitmire’s superstar Donnie Shell (former Pittsburgh Steeler and NFL Hall of Famer).

    In the ten game regular season and two playoff games, the Wildcats racked up 419 points to their opponents’ 124 with one lone blemish on their record, a 16-8 loss to Andrew Jackson HS early in the season. The eleven wins prior to the championship victory included wins over Lewisville, Pageland, Clover, Union, Chesterfield, Great Falls, Fort Mill, Buford, Irmo, Whitmire – playoff, and Traveler’s Rest- playoff.

    The ‘69 Wildcats entered the state title game against the Rebels of Strom Thurmond with identical records of 11-1. WHS, playing with the home field advantage, set out to prove themselves as champions in front of the 5000+ crowd on a cold night with a light drizzle falling during part of the game. U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond was in attendance as well as Fairfield’s own Medal of Honor Winner Webster Anderson.

    A recap of that big game includes the Wildcats scoring first when Eddie Coleman dashed 60 yards for a TD, and Ellis Johnson took the bobbled PAT snap across the end line to tack on two points, all in the first three minutes of the game. The Rebels answered back with two touchdowns in the second quarter to take and hold a 14-8 lead until late in the final period. Wildcat stellar tailback Randy Flanders scored with just over six minutes left in the game, and Geddings kicked the game winning PAT. Flanders, Johnson, and Coleman combined forces to rack up 199 yards on the ground. Pope is credited with blocking a PAT effort by the Rebel kicker that later proved to be crucial for the Rebels.

    Out of the ranks came postseason honors for all conference players Joe Wilkes, Ellis Johnson, Eddie Coleman, Thomas Young, Will Pope, Rhyne Jones and Randy Flanders. Flanders, named Back of the Year, and Pope were also named to the All State team and selected for the Shrine Bowl game. Six of the players went on the continue their football career at the next level – Randy Flanders at Clemson, Robert Wood at USC, Will Pope at Western Carolina, Ellis Johnson and Robert Sharpe at The Citadel, and Ronnie Hornsby at Appalachian State. A number of these former players have held football coaching positions at the high school level, but Johnson’s coaching career went to the next level and included stints at Auburn, Alabama, Clemson, USC, Gardner-Webb, The Citadel, Southern Miss, Appalachian State, East Carolina, and Mississippi State.

    Will and Pattie Pope, Lee and Dawn Lucas, Andy McDonald, Debra and Eugene Woodruff
    From left: Trainers Charlie Freeman and Ben Foster, Joe Wilkes, Barney Smith, Lee Lucas, Bill Porter, Buddy Poole, Luncford Bass, Steve Evans, Thomas Murphy, Eddie Coleman, Ellis Johnson, Will Pope, Robert Sharpe, Roger Fowler, Donnie Bonds, Frank Barwick, Eugene Woodruff, Richard Enloe, Thomas Young, Johnny Renwick, Larry Irby, Robert Wood, coaches Eddie Raines and Wayne Sibbett. Not pictured are Rhyne Jones, Kenny Atkerson, Jake Arnette, Al Shirley, Mike Griggs, Jimmy Isenhower, and Tommy Johnston
  • New Owners – New Club: Introducing the Blythewood Country Club

    Photos: Barbara Ball

    BLYTHEWOOD – The new Blythewood Country Club open house on Friday welcomed an outdoor patio full of guests to the new look of the former Windermere Club.

    Fred Layman, the club’s manager, introduced Jorge Martinez, the president and Principle Partner, COO David Biscan and other principles of the new venture.

    Guests enjoyed live music and complimentary hamburgers, hot dogs and wine on the patio overlooking the lake. The club offered special rates on Friday for golfers and tours of the new 3,000 square-foot state-of-the-art fitness center that also overlooks the lake.

    The Pete Dye golf course and the dining facilities are open to the public.

    For membership information or to tour the renovated facility, call Layman at 786-6088.

  • Council OKs first vote for industrial zoning

    County: Rezoning Must be Finalized by Late September

    BLYTHEWOOD – Richland County made another appeal to Town Council Monday night, the strongest yet, to approve the rezoning of 162 acres west of I-77 for industrial use. That effort was met by strong opposition from a room full of citizens and a couple of council members.

    The property is part of 1,349 acres the County hopes to purchase for $26 million for an industrial park. Town Council has already rezoned an adjacent 678 Blythewood acres to LI 2 at the County’s request. The remaining 509 adjacent acres are located in Richland County and are currently being rezoned for industrial use by the County. The county hopes to have the zoning of the entire 1,349 acres by late September. To pay for the purchase of the land, the County taking out a bond. Hence the hurry-up to rezone.

    “The goal is to close on the bond by Nov. 1,” Director of the County’s Economic Development office Jeff Rubble told council members Monday night. “As part of the bonding process, the folks that sell the bonds want to see that the property is zoned consistent with its intended use [prior to issuing the bond.] So that’s the reason we’re coming to you now.”

    After the better part of a two hour meeting and an hour of contentious speeches by citizens opposed for one reason or another to the rezoning process, Council voted 4 – 1 to approve first reading. While Councilmen Bryan Franklin and Malcolm Gordge addressed stipulations they would like to see in regard to the rezoning, only Franklin voted against it.  A second and final reading is set for Sept. 23.

    “We would like to have gone through a nice, slow process, with about 100 different community meetings,” Ruble said. “But they’re saying, ‘Guys, you’ve got to sign or we can’t buy.’ So that has accelerated our process. That’s why we’re here tonight,” Ruble said. Addressing the concerns of those he said he expected to oppose the rezoning during public comment time at the meeting, Ruble assured the packed audience that the county is not trying to ram something down their throats, giving examples of how the County is trying to be accommodating to the town.

    “We will set 100 foot buffers and try to route as much of the heavy traffic as we can to Community Road to the south, away from town,” Ruble said. “By the second reading, we want to have covenants and restrictions in place for you to see.  We plan to set up an Architectural Review Board (ARB) for new companies coming into the industrial park.”

     “The Town of Blythewood could have a designee on that review board. So you’re not just signing away your life now. You’re an active participant in helping us develop it,” Ruble said.

    Those concessions fell short for audience members who insisted the ARB should predominately be peopled by Blythewood folks since the 840 acres of the industrial park are in the town.

    Ruble said the county envisions walking trails, bike paths and other amenities in the park. He also promised clean, high tech manufacturing.

    “We’re trying to create that nice environment. The kind of companies we’re trying to target are the higher rated companies with high wages and technology companies,” Ruble said.

    Warning: We Walk

    “I wish we had more time to have meetings and talk. But this is a critical step that if you turn it down tonight, we walk,” Ruble warned.

    He also warned that the land could be purchased for homes, many homes that could bring higher levels of traffic.

    “We know the [property] owners are hearing every day from residential developers,” Ruble said. “There’s a lot of folks offering money. What we heard from the town was they don’t necessarily want to see more dense residential development. We proposed a solution. Let us come in. We’ll buy the property and we’ll work together to develop it in conjunction with the town,” Ruble promised.

    But former Town Councilman Tom Utroska scoffed at what he called the emotional tact.

    “I’m taken aback that politics in our country are now run by emotions instead of facts,” Utroska said. “One emotional statement was made that it would be a lot better if it was an industrial development rather than some huge, complex of homes. Well, as I recall, in D-1 you have to have 20,000 square foot lots. So you can only get two homes to an acre. I don’t like leading people down a road and influencing them by telling them something that it’s not,” Utroska said. “Also, we need some kind of Memorandum of Understanding, in writing, that says what’s going to happen with the traffic that will be generated by this LI2. We also need something in writing to address the need for a fire station.”

    Utroska said he doesn’t want to look back 20 years from now and say ‘I’m a party to this. It’s a screw up.’

    “We shouldn’t have just one member on the ARB. The preponderance of the members should be from Blythewood if it’s in Blythewood,” he said. Utroska also called for a new exit off I-77 to accommodate the industrial park. “We don’t need semis on Blythewood Road going to the LI2 area.

    “I understand their need to have this done. But we need to have some protection,” Utroska said.

    Cobblestone resident John Moore called on Council to beware of the County’s promises.

    “I’m not opposed to the development. But it can change the shape of what we are. I don’t have a lot of trust in Richland County,” Moore said.

    Rural Blythewood resident Bill Shives also warned about the effect the development would have on the town.

    “So many people moved here because of the quality of life and what it has to offer,” Shives said “Once the tax incentives for companies and factories expire, they’re gone. I don’t see where that’s a great economic value to the community.”

    The town’s planning commission voted 3-3 for the rezoning earlier this month, leaving no recommendation to council from the commission. At that meeting, Stuart Andrews, who lives in the Middlefield Lane area off Persimmon Fork Road, suggested council eliminate the more intense manufacturing uses allowed in the LI2 zoning district.

    “Let’s not just open the door to everything,” Andrews said. “Some of those allowed uses we don’t consider good neighbors – textile mills, steel fabrication, wood product manufacturing, copper recovery, sheet metal, small arms and aircraft manufacturing,” he said. 

    “You can’t have a first class project unless you have a first class process,” Andrews said. Speaking Monday night for a number of rural residents along Syrup Mill and Persimmon Fork Roads, Andrews said the group had not reached a conclusion about whether they support the project or not. It depends in large part on the process itself,

    “It’s not fair to ask the public to support something with so little understanding of it,” Andrews said. He called for a process the community could participate in. “We aren’t going to be comfortable with a product presented publicly in 30 days.”

    Andrews asked for his group and others in the community to be allowed to review the covenants of restricted documents proposed for the project.

    “We’ve reviewed those documents for similar projects and have a feel for what needs to be in them, where the opportunities are for further public protection…With the County as a developer and public body, we think more public participation should be encouraged,” Andrews said.

    Rural resident Wes Penfield called for a portion of the park to be carved out for playing fields for area youth.

    Councilman Bryan Franklin agreed.

    “We now have an opportunity here with this property right here to take 40 acres on the north part that sits right on Blythewood Road and build us the park we’ve so need for years and years,” Franklin said. “This is an opportunity for us. The public is buying this property, we’re going to rezone it, maybe, and now is an opportunity to develop that upper end, buy it at a fair dollar and put our park there. When the lights go on and stay on until 11 o’clock at night. They won’t disturb anybody because it’s in an industrial area. It only makes sense.”

    Councilman Malcolm Gordge, who is running for the mayor’s seat in the upcoming election, said Franklin expressed his sentiments perfectly.

    “I would like to ask Jeff (Ruble) if he has any difficulty at all in pursuing that vision of a recreation area and football field within that LI2 district,” Gordge asked Ruble.

    “Yeah, I don’t know. I certainly can’t commit to something tonight. I think we’ve had some conversations with staff. So we’re working toward it,” Ruble said.

    Before calling for the vote, Mayor J. Michael Ross defended the project and the County’s process, saying “we have known about this for a long time. This is no surprise. I think that when you hear some of the things that they have talked about [in executive session], I can’t imagine that you would not want that level of a technology industrial campus. It would be unbelievable for this community and for this downtown.”

    Ross agreed with Ruble that if the industrial park doesn’t come, then more homes might take the space. But he also agreed with those who spoke, that traffic is an issue, that a fire station “is a no brainer,” but hedged on the call for more Blythwoodians on the proposed LI2 Architectural Review Board.

    “That needs to be a group that would be equally divided between the County and Blythewood,” he said. “But the sports complex is the clincher. I think that’s something we need to work on hard over the next 30 days to see if it can be done.

    The next meeting is set for Sept. 23 at 7 p.m. at The Manor.

  • Teacher Village door remains open

    Dr. J.R. Green, superintendent of the Fairfield County School District (right), urges Fairfield County Council to support the Teacher Village as Council Chairman Neil Robinson looks on. | Photos: Michael Smith

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County is one vote away from approving tax abatements for the Teacher Village, a proposed Fairfield County School District housing project intended to cater to teachers.

    But what agreement Fairfield County may ultimately reach with the school district still remain under wraps.

    After spending 20 minutes behind closed doors Monday night, County Council voted 7-0 to move forward with an ordinance that provides economic development incentives to Gorelick Brothers Capital, a Charlotte, North Carolina investment firm interested in building the Teacher Village.

    Council members did not publicly discuss the Teacher Village agreement. Council Chairman Neil Robinson told council members not to discuss specifics in open session.

    Seeking to assure residents over the lack of details, Councilman Jimmy Ray Douglas said full disclosure of the agreement would come before final reading, which could be scheduled as soon as the Sept. 9 meeting.

    “This will be explained in full before we have third reading,” he said.

    In its current form, the proposed Fairfield County Teacher Village would consist of 30 homes constructed on 22 acres the district owns behind the district office in Winnsboro.

    Teachers would receive first priority, followed by school district employees, then first responders. Another 30 homes would be built if the first phase is successful.

    Rent subsidies of $300 per month would be reserved for teachers only, with monthly rent ranging between $600 and $900, depending on the home. The subsidies would come from funding included in a state budget proviso.

    Gorelick is also asking Fairfield County Council for a seven-year tax abatement totaling about $600,000.

    The final percentage of the tax abatement hasn’t been decided. Gorelick and the county are currently haggling over what the final percentage should be.

    Another major sticking point for the county is the inclusion of an indemnification clause.

    At a joint meeting in November 2018, former Council Chairman Billy Smith pushed for verbiage that would indemnify Fairfield County should any litigation arise relating to the Teacher Village.

    Smith also wanted an agreement to cover Fairfield’s legal expenses should any arise. It was unclear as of press time whether or not either condition found its way into the agreement now under consideration.

    At the November 2018 meeting, Superintendent Dr. J.R. Green said he didn’t think the Teacher Village would drag Fairfield County into litigation. He voiced concerns that delaying action might jeopardize the project.

    “If that’s the takeaway, that’s not reasonable,” Green said. “I don’t know how Gorelick is going to respond to this. The longer this stretches out, the more the likelihood Gorelick pulls out.”

    Supporters plead for Village

    Councilwoman Bertha Goins, a major supporter of the Teacher Village, said the project is needed for economic development and also to provide adequate housing in Fairfield County.

    Fairfield County Councilwoman Bertha Goins expresses her support for the Teacher Village at Monday night’s council meeting.

    “Without going into detail, I’d say we’re looking at the finish line. I did not take this project lightly, I did not take this decision likely,” Goins said.

    Five of the six area residents speaking in public input spoke in support of the Teacher Village.

    Fairfield Elementary teacher Theresa Wiggins told council members the commute from her home in northeast Columbia to work is long, but Winnsboro lacks adequate housing.

    Dr. Jim Rex, former S.C. Superintendent of Education, whose wife serves on a Fairfield County school district foundation that worked on the Teacher Village, also spoke in favor of the housing project.

    “You have the opportunity tonight to do something truly historic,” Rex said. “I urge you not to let this opportunity pass.”

    Lisa Ellis, board member of S.C. for ED, a teacher advocacy group, spoke earlier in the week with The Voice. Ellis said she thinks the Teacher Village and similar teacher housing projects may be more valuable to younger teachers saddled by student loan debt.

    A former Fairfield County teacher now working in Richland Two, Ellis said higher pay is generally more important to veteran teachers than publicly funded housing. Ellis also thinks housing subsidies might make more sense in high cost of living areas, such as California or New York.

    “Ultimately it depends upon where you are in your teaching career,” she said. “If you’re brand new, out of college, it may be a pro for you. (Veteran teachers) have a house, have a mortgage.”

  • Residents call out Trapp’s absences

    WINNSBORO – He represents Fairfield County’s largest council district, but Mikel Trapp has been spending the least amount of time at council meetings. 

    Mikel Trapp

    Re-elected in 2018, the District 3 Councilman has been absent for six council meetings or budget workshops so far in 2019, according to County Council minutes.

    Trapp has also left early on another six occasions, his departure times ranging from 6:43 p.m. to 7:01 p.m., including Monday night when he left before the council discussed revisions to the county administrator’s contract.

    Trapp hasn’t attended a full council meeting since May 14, council minutes show. He couldn’t be reached for comment Tuesday.

    The public is taking notice of Trapp’s truancy.

    Three residents took to the podium Monday night to voice disapproval of Trapp’s absences. 

    An empty chair marks where Fairfield County Councilman Mikel Trapp normally sits during council meetings. Trapp left early for the third meeting in a row, drawing objections from Fairfield County resident Chris Griffiths (standing), who during public comments asked council members to reprimand Trapp. Seated at left is Councilman Jimmy Ray Douglas. | Michael Smith

    One of those residents was Chris Griffiths, who expressed frustration that some county residents essentially aren’t being represented. Griffiths called upon the remaining council members to hold Trapp accountable.

    “There’s nothing that anybody can do other than contacting the governor’s office and getting that elected official removed,” Griffiths said. “I find it very offensive that the chair for the District 3 is empty right now and it’s consistently empty. I feel this is extremely wrong.”

    “The gentleman who came up here before, I agree with 100 percent,” added county resident Jeff Schaffer. “Do something about it. You can’t have a council member who does nothing, gets elected to sit here, doesn’t vote, doesn’t participate and gets paid. People have to go to work every day; if they don’t go to work, they get fired.”

    Ridgeway resident Randy Bright suggested docking council member pay as a deterrent.

    “This is an embarrassment to the county,” Bright said. “I’ve attended far more meetings. I’m a senior citizen who had a total knee replacement earlier in the year and have missed only one council meeting. I can’t imagine any excuse for this. You guys are too good, too smart to let it continue.”

    Fairfield County Council’s rules of procedure address attendance, but don’t mention any penalties for violations.

    “Fairfield County Council respects the State of South Carolina’s Constitution as it relates to fulfilling the duties of office as an elected representative of Fairfield County and our oath of office,” the policy states. “Each member of Council should attend every public meeting as scheduled by a majority of Council.”

    Other South Carolina counties are conspicuously mum on how they address chronic absenteeism as well.

    In Berkeley County, excessive absenteeism is reviewed on a case-by-case basis, though the council “reserves the right to take any action it deems appropriate at that time,” according to that county’s rules of procedure.

    Georgetown County Council doesn’t specifically address attendance, but council members can be censured for violating decorum and debate rules. 

    Florence’s attendance policy merely states members shall attend meetings and that only the chairman may excuse an absence.

    Aiken County’s rules only address long term absences of the chairman, merely stating that “state statutes” shall govern how to proceed following “his/her inability to perform the duties of the chair.”

    Traditionally, the governor may remove a council member for committing a felony or “crime of moral turpitude,” according to state law.

    S.C. Attorney General opinions generally state that local governments possess the power to discipline its own members, including by ejection.

    But the office also cautions city and county councils to strike a balance between enforcing the rules and not violating First Amendment protections.

    Here’s a rundown of Trapp’s attendance record for the last three months, according to council meeting minutes. The meetings start at 6 p.m. The time of Trapp’s departure and when the meeting adjourned are noted where relevant.

    Aug. 26 – Left 6:56 p.m.; adjourned 8:15 p.m.

    Aug. 12 – Left 6:25 p.m.; adjourned 8:45 p.m.

    July 22 – Absent

    July 8 – Left 6:43 p.m.; adjourned 8:10 p.m.

    June 24 – Left 6:52 p.m., adjourned 8:47 p.m.

    June 10 – Absent

  • Sheriff seeks shooting suspect

    Bouknight

    WINNSBORO – The Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office is seeking a suspect involved in a recent shooting incident in the Poplar Street area of Winnsboro.

    Charles Bouknight, 30, is wanted for 4 counts of Attempted Murder, Possession of a Weapon during a Violent Crime and Discharging a Firearm into a Dwelling during an incident that occurred Saturday, Aug. 17th in the 400 block of Poplar Street.

    If anyone has information regarding his location or this incident, they are asked to contact the Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office (803-635-4141) or Crimestoppers (1-888-CRIMESC or 1-888-274-6372). If anyone sees Bouknight, they are urged to immediately call 911.

  • BHS coach accused of recruiting RVHS players

    Some R2 Board Members Say
    They Were Not Told About Violations

    BLYTHEWOOD – An investigation aired last week by WIS-TV reported that Blythewood High School Head Coach Jason Seidel violated Richland School District Two’s “position on recruiting” by attempting to spirit away several football players from other Richland Two schools, including three from Ridge View High School, to play football for Blythewood High School.

    Seidel

    While numerous recruiting violations by Seidel reportedly occurred between mid-December, 2018 and the end of January, 2019, that information was not publicly acknowledged by the District until it was contacted on Aug. 14 by WIS which aired the story on Aug. 16.

    At least one Richland Two School Board member said she was not made aware of Seidel’s recruiting violations by administration until the day before the story appeared on WIS.

    In a statement issued last week after being contacted by WIS, Chief Communications Officer for the District, Libby Roof, reported that the District has since taken “appropriate personnel action with the coach for violations of the District’s position on recruiting.”

    The WIS report stated, however, that Ridge View High School officials were not satisfied with how the District handled the matter and, in March, 2019, appealed the District’s actions. While the District reported additional meetings with Ridge View officials and a meeting with the S.C. High School League, no further actions by the District were reported.

    Roof stated in an email to The Voice on Monday that, “at this time, the District considers the matter to be closed.”

    In a statement released last week, Roof gave a timeline of what the District knew about the reported recruitment violations and when they learned about them.

    “In January, 2019, Ridge View’s principal [Brenda Mack-Foxworth] reported possible recruitment of current football players by a Blythewood High football coach and a parent,” the District’s report stated.

    WIS reported last week that numerous tweets were exchanged between Seidel and Ridge View players during January, 2019.

    As reported by WIS, “In an exchange with Player A, on Jan. 13, Seidel stated, ‘The quicker you guys get here, the more I can do with you in the weight room.’ Seidel added, ‘Let the guys know that.’ ”

    The complete list of tweets is posted on the WIS website.

    A school district administrator conducted an investigation, according to the District’s statement, met with Seidel “and took appropriate personnel action with the coach for violations of the district’s position on recruiting,” according to the statement released by the District.

    The District’s Chief Administrative Services Officer met with Mack-Foxworth and Ridge View’s athletic director to explain that the District had informed the S.C. High School League of the possible recruitment violations, but that “SCHSL informed the district that due to the fact that the students who were contacted did not transfer, no violation with SCHSL occurred,” according to the District statement.

    Mack-Foxworth and Ridge View’s athletic director were also informed that the District had taken “appropriate personnel actions” against Seidel in response to the results of their its investigation.

    According to reports, however, Ridge View administrators were not satisfied with how Richland Two handled the matter and, in March, 2019, Mack-Foxworth submitted an appeal to the Richland Two Assistant Superintendent for middle schools and high schools to request the collection of evidence against Seidel be submitted to the SCHSL, and to verify that the consequences for the Blythewood High coach “reflect the time and resources spent in investigating” the possible recruitment violation.

    In response to Mack-Foxworth’s appeal, district administrators met with the SCHSL on April 12 “and shared the written evidence of the situation.” Again, the SCHSL confirmed that “since the students who were contacted did not transfer, no violation with SCHSL occurred. Any consequences to the coach would be left to the District.”

    The District officials will not disclose the specific actions taken against Seidel, saying, “personnel matters are confidential” and cannot be shared with Ridge View administrators.

    “Richland School District Two takes recruitment violations seriously and believes that everyone must abide by the spirit of the rule in order to remain fair, consistent and honorable throughout all of our schools’ athletic programs,” according to the District’s statement.

    The District Two athletics manual provides the following regarding recruiting: “Recruiting of prospective students for athletic purposes is a serious ethical violation of the philosophy and ideals of interscholastic athletics and will be treated as such. For purposes of this section, recruiting is defined as an attempt by an individual(s) or group associated with a school to entice a student to attend or to transfer to a school for athletic purposes through the exertion of undue influence or any special treatment.”

    The District disclosed that, at the beginning of each school year, all coaches in the district must review the district’s Athletic Staff Operations Manual and sign a form stating that they agree to read the manual and adhere to all rules and regulations.

    Seidel’s Blythewood Bengals face off against the Ridge View Blazers Friday night in the season opener at 7:30 in the District Two stadium that is located at Blythewood High School but shared by both schools.

  • R2 board votes 12.3% pay hike for Super

    Board Split Over Size of Raise, Polling

    COLUMBIA – It’s been a profitable summer for Dr. Baron Davis, superintendent of the Richland Two school district.

    On July 1, Davis’ salary rose from $191,904 to $197,661 after he accepted a STEP increase coupled with a 1 percent raise the district gave administrators.

    Six weeks later, the Richland Two Board of trustees tacked on another 12.3 percent, elevating the superintendent’s base pay to $221,973, fifth highest in the state, according to public records.

    William Royster, superintendent of Greenville County schools, leads the state at $253,636, followed by Gerrita Postlewait (Charleston-$233,000), Rick Maxey (Horry-$230,869) and Darryl Owings (Spartanburg 6-$224,924).

    On Aug. 13, the Richland Two board voted 5-2 in favor of Davis’ increase, which includes a two-year contract extension and a 2.5 percent increase in annuity contributions. Davis also can only be dismissed by supermajority (5-2) vote.

    Trustees Monica Elkins-Johnson and Lindsay Agostini voted in opposition.

    Elkins-Johnson said aside from objecting to the supermajority clause, she supports Davis. 

    “I want to publicly apologize to you Dr. Davis because I support 75 percent of your contract. There is only one item that I have an issue with and that is the supermajority,” she said. 

    Elkins-Johnson also claimed Board Chairman James Manning polled board members.

    “We were polled by the chair. He made a phone call and polled the board prior to, so I will not be supporting this,” Elkins-Johnson said during the meeting.

    Manning said he did occasionally speak with board members about the contract, but never polled anybody.

    While she voted against the contract, Agostini also said she didn’t get the perception that Manning polled other board members.

    “He did not poll me. He and I had a conversation about where I stood, as I frequently have discussions with other board members to discuss or seek clarity,” Agostini said in phone interview Tuesday. “It’s not uncommon for us to speak outside of a board meeting.”

    She did voice concerns about the supermajority clause, as well as the size of Davis’ raise. 

    “I, too, am unable to support the new contract based upon the supermajority vote,” Agostini said on Aug. 13. “I also have a concern about setting precedent with such a large salary increase.”

    Agostini said she would have been more comfortable approving an increase that would have placed Davis in the $200,000 and $205,000 a year range.

    “I don’t have an exact percentage,” she said Tuesday. “I do believe that he deserves a raise.”

    Trustee Teresa Holmes also thought the supermajority clause was improper, though she ultimately voted for the contract.

    “I am not in agreement with the five-vote (clause in the) contract,” Holmes said. “When we make policies, we can’t make policies for one specific person.”

    State law doesn’t specifically prohibit public bodies from instituting supermajority thresholds to approve a measure.

    In 2017, an S.C. Attorney General Office opinion said a Greenville County ordinance requiring a supermajority vote to enact a fee paying for a new communications system didn’t violate state law.

    “Courts have consistently recognized the basic principal that a local ordinance, just like a state statute, is presumed to be valid as enacted unless or until a court declares it to be invalid,” the opinion states.

    Manning said the supermajority clause has been in previous Richland Two superintendent contracts, and it’s only fair to include it in Davis’ contract.

    “Dr. Davis has proven himself to be an exceptional leader,” Manning said. “We were simply bringing his contract in line with where we had other superintendents.”

    As to the raise, Manning said Davis deserved 12.3 percent because of his vast responsibilities leading one of the state’s biggest districts.

    “You could look that as a huge increase or you can look at that he’s an at will employee who serves at the will of the board and can be terminated at any point,” Manning said. “There is some additional risk in his position that most of our staff do not have.”

    The raise Davis received is substantially more than the 2.5 percent increase he got in September 2018. It’s also greater than the 4 percent raises – newer teachers received more – included in the state’s 2019-2020 budget.

    Lisa Ellis, a board member for SC for ED, a teacher advocacy group that led a State House rally in May calling for higher educator pay, said school districts in general should dedicate less money to administration and more into the classroom.

    “We worked hard at the state level all year to try to get that salary increase,” Ellis said. “Money is not really getting into the classroom. [School districts] are spending money at the district office. For teachers, that’s a really frustrating place for them to spend it.”

  • Fanning supported magistrate back pay

    CHESTER – State Senator Mike Fanning believes Magistrate Angel Underwood deserved to receive back pay for the time she was suspended from the bench, but did not personally have a hand in her receiving a $39,000 lump sum payment, Fanning said.

    Fanning told the News & Reporter last week Underwood received the salary she should have earned because her suspension was not in fact the punishment meted out by the S.C. Supreme Court and the S.C. Judicial Department. She was suspended in May of 2015 while a possible conflict of interest matter (see related story) was investigated, and once court administration found she had violated procedures, the prescription for her getting back on the bench was to admit she had proceeded incorrectly and accept public censure from the Court and a suspension, which was imposed retroactively to the date she was suspended during the investigation. In effect, she was suspended, but not suspended without pay, Fanning pointed out.

    “The suspension that ended up being for a year was not a prospective punishment of a magistrate, it was the court administration taking a year to investigate and reach a conclusion,” he said.

    “There was no conclusion by the court that she would never be paid for that suspension,” he said.

    The order from the S.C. Supreme Court placing Judge Underwood on suspension did state, “Chester County is under no obligation to pay respondent her salary during the suspension.”

    Fanning said his “Cliff’s Notes” version of what Underwood’s misconduct was is “she had all of the defendants and gave them the opportunity to get another judge – she made sure that they were aware (she was married to the Chester County Sheriff) and that they had the right to another judge, or they could waive that right. The only thing she didn’t do, was do that individually before each case,” said Fanning.

    He pointed out the court administration made the decision that this misconduct did not rise to the level of negligence enough to warrant any major imposition of discipline or any other punishments (including loss of pay while she was suspended during the investigation).

    “Since it took a year, the court said since she had already been suspended for a year, that would suffice as a discipline, if she signed a statement saying she accepted public reprimand and wouldn’t do it again,” said Fanning.

    Underwood’s suspension was lifted in September of 2016 after she accepted a public reprimand and according to the order from the state Supreme Court, “admitted her misconduct and (consented) to the imposition of any discipline up to a one year suspension from judicial duties. She requests that any suspension be imposed retroactively to May 8, 2015, the date of her interim suspension. We accept the agreement and impose a public reprimand.”

    Fanning added he was not involved in getting Judge Underwood her back pay or state retirement or any state reimbursements.

    “I would have been for (her receiving her back pay) but I don’t necessarily have any power to do that,” Fanning said.

    Fanning pointed out that in January of 2017, when Chester County Supervisor Shane Stuart wrote in the email that he was going to ask the Senator to see if there were state reimbursements for Judge Underwood, he had not even taken his first vote in the legislature as a new Senator.

    “I was the one that was responsible for making the recommendation that she be reinstated,” he said. “That was under my purview – they had to go through an investigation and at the end of the investigation…I made a recommendation upon the conclusion of the investigation that she be reinstated,” he said.

    “If I got her reinstated and we were talking about getting her pay before I ever took a single vote in the Senate, I think I’d remember that,” he said.

    He added, “But I would have wanted the county to take whatever measures to pay a magistrate that had been reinstated, and if they needed to prepare for that (in the budget) then I would have given them a heads up on that.

    “I try to do that with anybody – if we’re hiring a new Veterans Affairs Director for Fairfield County, I try to give the county whatever warning that they’re going to have a new employee,” he said.

    “There’s no way Judge Underwood got back pay before she was reinstated,” Fanning added.


    This story was reprinted with permission from The Chester News & Reporter.