WINNSBORO – A Fairfield County ad hoc committee report takes
several jabs at financial decisions tied to the Mt. Zion renovation project but
the financial facts regarding the renovation of Mt. Zion did not vary from what
had earlier been made public.
The report, delivered at a special meeting last week by
Councilwoman Shirley Greene, chair of the ad hoc committee, rebukes the
decision to repurpose Mt. Zion into a new county building for reasons she
claims are divisive.
“The choice to place the seat of local government on a site
that embodies Fairfield County’s segregated past excludes the total community,”
her report states.
“Hopefully, this report and observations will help us as
citizens examine ourselves and our commitment to fairness and unity.”
While at one time Mt. Zion was attended primarily by white
students, it was later desegregated and attended by both black and white
students.
Greene insisted the primary focus of the committee was
advisory in nature, noting there have been “many efforts to give misinformation
about what the role of the ad hoc committee was, and other things.”
Greene and council members Moses Bell, Mikel Trapp and Tim
Roseborough have commented negatively on the use of the building as a county
administration building. According to public records, one council member spoke
publicly to cancelling of the contract.
In March, Councilman Tim Roseborough, who also serves on the ad hoc committee, quizzed developers about what consequences the county would face if it canceled the contract.
“If the county decides to break the lease, it would cost the
county $1 million,” Roseborough said, referencing a $1 million contingency fund
that was established for the project. “Is that what you’re saying?”
“No sir,” Rory Dowling with 1st and Main, the project
developer, replied. “We would be forced to enter into some legal ramifications
with the county because we’re on the hook for $13.5 million.”
Greene criticized 1st and Main and Taylor for having joint
access to the account without going through procurement or receiving council
approval.
“That is how the previous council agreed it should be done,”
Taylor said. “Council approval was not required because it was more practical
to work through the escrow to pay for change orders rather than be delayed for
weeks getting council approval for every change order.”
Greene also took aim at 1st and Main’s decision at one point to stop allowing the county to dip into a $1 million escrow fund. But Dowling took that action only after Bell refused to pay for various change orders that eventually totaled over $328,000, including penalties for delay in the work.
County Administrator Jason Taylor said one benefit of the
escrow account was that it offered convenience. He said it gave the county a
quick way to cover unexpected expenses.
Greene further criticized 1st and Main for locking Fairfield
out of the account.
“The developer assumed that the council was seeking to
cancel the contract and stopped allowing Mr. Taylor, our county administrator,
to use the escrow account, resulting in additional costs after March 15,”
Greene said.
Emails obtained by The Voice state that 1st and Main moved
to protect the escrow by locking out the county only after council members
Mikel Trapp, Greene, Roseborough and Chairman Moses Bell broached canceling the
contract.
Taylor said it was Bell who asked him in an email to stop
paying for the change orders. This, Taylor said, made 1st and Main developer
Rory Dowling uncomfortable to the point that he moved to protect his escrow.
Greene also took issue with 1st and Main’s expenditure of
over $900,000 on various upfits. She claimed this has driven the actual Mt.
Zion cost from $8.7 million to about $9.7 million.
Most of those upfits, however, relate to an E911 center that the county would have had to fund even if the county stayed in its current administration building.
Taylor said all counties, including Fairfield, collect an
E911 tariff on residential phone bills, which subsidize E911 operations.
“That money is collected and put in a separate account for
periodic upgrades to E911,” Taylor said. “We would have to start to replace the
[E911 center] here even if we stayed in this building.”
Not everyone on the ad hoc committee embraced its findings.
“I just want to thank Ms. Greene for her research. I’d be
remiss if I took any credit for it,” Councilman Neil Robinson said at an April
21 meeting. Robinson was appointed by Bell to serve on the committee with
Greene and Roseborough.
Asked Tuesday about his remark, Robinson said it was
intended as tongue-in-cheek. Re-examining the contract now is unnecessary and
unproductive, he said.
“I was being sarcastic in a sophisticated kind of way,”
Robinson said. “She’s doing research on information that’s been out there for
two years already.”
Bell, the council chairman, said Monday night the
committee’s work was necessary in reviewing the totality of the contract.
“We had been hearing concerns about how much money it was
costing us. There was some discrepancy that we had to pay versus what we didn’t
have to pay. We wanted to have a total look at the contract,” Bell said. He did
not reveal what those discrepancies were.
In addition to big ticket items, Greene also took issue with
a $13,000 expenditure to hire Dr. Elijah Gaddis and Peter Thomas to research
the history of Mt. Zion. Fairfield County and 1st and Main split the cost
50-50, she said.
“This inequitable allocation of research funding produced a
narrative that reinforced and affirmed Mt. Zion’s past … without consideration
of how presentation of this historical perspective in isolation affects Black
citizens,” the report states.
The study referenced by Greene actually concentrated on
Fairfield County’s entire education system, not just Mt. Zion, Taylor said. It
was suggested by the study to perhaps house exhibits from all of the county’s
education facilities over the years. The teacherage was purchased with those
and other exhibits in mind.
Dowling also explained that some portion of the wide
hallways in the Mt. Zion building might be used for displays reflecting all the
county’s schools.
Greene cited other racial grievances, including the
Confederate monument that stands on the Mt. Zion property.
However, she didn’t mention at the meeting that the county and Town of Winnsboro have previously offered to move the monument, but are prohibited by state law.
The Winnsboro monument likely falls under the South Carolina
Heritage Act, which prohibits any war monument from being moved or disturbed.
The S.C. Attorney General’s Office has issued several
opinions stating that similar monuments elsewhere in South Carolina fall under
the act.
Enacted in 2000, the Heritage Act requires a two-thirds
majority vote in both houses of the S.C. General Assembly.
Such a vote has occurred only once, when the state in 2015
voted to remove the Confederate battle flag from Statehouse grounds following a
mass shooting at a Charleston church.
