Category: News

  • Early morning crash in Blythewood leaves one dead

    BLYTHEWOOD – A single vehicle crash that occurred at about 4:30 a.m., Friday, July 15, has taken the life of the driver, according to Master Trooper Brandon J. Bolt of the SC Highway Patrol.

    The crash happened on Mullis Road at Claude Bundrick Road, about two miles north of the Town of Blythewood.

    A 2008 Maxima with one occupant, was traveling south on Mullis Road when it ran off the right side of the road, hit a ditch and struck a tree, killing the driver, according to the report.

    The deceased has been identified by the Richland County Coroner’s office as Joseph Freeman Jr., 53, of Blythewood.

    The crash is being investigate by the SCHP.

    There are no other details about the crash available at this time.

  • Fairfield County Detention Center Director resigns abruptly

    Says administration is ineffective, unprofessional, uncaring and unreachable.

    WINNSBORO – Longtime Fairfield County Detention Center Director Teresa Lawson resigned abruptly today (Thursday, July 14), telling The Voice that she feels undermined by the county administration to the point that she can no longer effectively do her job.

    In an exclusive interview with The Voice after submitting her resignation letter, Lawson said the problems have been mounting over the past year, but the most troubling issue occurred recently when she learned that County Administrator Malik Whitaker had posted a job for a deputy director for the Detention Center without her knowledge or input.

    She said the current administration under Whitaker, who has been with the county since December 2021, is ineffective, unprofessional, uncaring and unreachable. Lawson said she has worked for the county for almost 40 years and has served as detention center director for about the last 10 years.

    “I feel I’ve done a good job. I’ve never been reprimanded or had any problems associated with my work,” Lawson told The Voice.

    “Failure to address [the detention center’s] staffing concerns and other critical issues has made this position impossible to succeed in,” Lawson wrote in her resignation letter that was sent to Whitaker with copies to county council members earlier today (Thursday).

    The letter gave several examples as to why she felt she must resign effective today.

    “I was not consulted with regards to the newly (sic) deputy directior position. I learned of this by watching a county council meeting.

    “Even after it (the position) was approved, I was not aware until someone notified me it was on the website as open,” she wrote.

    Lawson said in her resignation letter that she originally requested and desperately needed two officer positions – which she later learned had been frozen the previous fiscal year. Again, she said she had no knowledge or input when the positions were frozen.

    Lawson told The Voice that instead of reopening the two needed positions, she learned the administration was giving her one of those needed positions and a deputy director that she did not need.

    “Raises have been requested and denied,” she wrote to Whitaker. “We are in desperate need of officers on the floor, not in administration. Due to the severe budget cuts implemented, I feel there may be consequences if there are overages.

    “As of right now we have 22 violent offenders and several mental health inmates that require additional security,” she wrote.

    She wrote that an audit by the SC Association of County’s insurance provider shows that low staffing is at a dangerous level.

    “The mental stress and frustration with this administration is too much for me to carry,” Lawson wrote.

    “If this continues, it will place my health, the safety of the staff, inmates and the citizens which we protect in jeopardy. The Fairfield County Detention Center like all [the county’s] emergency departments, are in a crash-and-burn state,” she wrote. “I cannot take the risk of being personally liable for any incident because I am the legal, certified director by state law.”

    ___________________________________________________________

    The comment below in regard to Lawson’s resignation was received from Whitaker at 4:04 this afternoon.

    “It is with deep regret I am announcing the resignation of Teresa Lawson as Fairfield County Detention Center Director. Ms. Lawson’s resignation is effective today, July 14, 2022. Director Lawson had been a committed employee of Fairfield County for several years.

    Captain Harriet Squirewell of the Fairfield County Detention Center is assuming operation command of the Fairfield County Detention Center for a period of 60 days. Captain Squirewell’s appointment is effective July 15, 2022.  Administration will work with Detention Center staff to support continued safe operation of the Fairfield County Detention Center as we work through the process for hiring new and effective leadership.”

  • Fatal 3-vehicle crash released flammable chemicals, closing I-77 between exits 27 & 34

    A Volvo truck carrying ammonium sulfate burst into flames after colliding with a pickup on I-77 southbound. | Photos: Fairfield County Fire Service

    FAIRFIELD COUNTY – An early morning three-vehicle fatal crash including a truck carrying ammonium sulfate occurred Thursday near exit 32 on I-77,  sending plumes of chemical smoke and flames into the air.

    A shelter-in-place order was issued for the area that, at one point during the morning, included the Town of Ridgeway.

    Aerial view of crash

    The crash occurred at 3:59 a.m. near mile marker 32 when the three vehicles, all traveling in the south-bound lane, collided.

     A 1999 Chevrolet pickup truck made an improper lane change, according to Master Trooper Gary Miller of the SC Highway Patrol, and was struck by a 2003 Peterbuilt truck. The pickup was then struck by a 2020 Volvo truck pulling a trailer transporting the ammonia sulfate.

    The Volvo truck and the pickup truck went off the right side of the roadway, through a guard rail and into a ravine, killing the driver of the pickup truck. Both vehicles burst into flames.

    Killed in the crash was Charles Wayne Hartley, 54, of Lancaster, SC, according to the Fairfield County Coroner’s office. The driver of the Volvo truck was transported to an area hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. The driver of the Peterbuilt tractor was not injured.

    The Volvo truck’s chemical cargo caused the Fairfield County Fire Service to issue a shelter-in-place at about 8 a.m. for a one-mile radius.

    By 8:30 a.m., a shelter-in-place order had been issued for the Town of Ridgeway.

    The southbound lane on I-77 was closed at the 34 mile marker and the northbound lane was closed at Exit 27. Traffic was re-routed to Hwy 321 on the west side of the interstate and to Highway 21 on the east side of I-77. Traffic was slow through Ridgeway and Blythewood throughout most of the day as the detoured traffic made its way back onto I-77 via Blythewood Exit 24.

    By about 9:45 a.m., Fairfield Fire Service Director Jason Pope said the burning chemical substance had been identified and an action plan was put into place with crews working to extinguish the fire as well as control the scene.

    “We did not expect any immediate danger to life and health, however, the shelter-in-place order was still in effect until about 10:45 a.m., Fairfield County Sheriff Will Montgomery said.

    A hazmat unit, First Call, was on scene and a large tent was set up in the outside southbound lane of I-77. Firetrucks responded from Fairfield, Ridgeway, Rock Hill and Columbia. Eleven Fairfield County firefighters (5 paid and 6 volunteers) were on duty as well as the Fairfield County Rescue Squad, EMS, the Sheriff’s office, the SC Highway Patrol, SC Department of Transportation and the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), according to Fairfield Fire Service Director Jason Pope.

    By 10:45 a.m., Montgomery announced that the fire had been contained, the shelter-in-place order was lifted and the northbound lanes of I-77 were opened.

    By 2:10 p.m., after 10 hours, the fire units had cleared the scene as the remnants of the two burned trucks were lifted by heavy equipment into a truck with a boxcar trailer. Shortly thereafter one of the southbound lanes was opened.

    “It was a multi-agency response,” Pope said. “We were on scene from about 4 a.m. until about 2:30 p.m. when the SC Highway Patrol took over and all the lanes were open again.”

    The crash is being investigated by the S.C. Highway Patrol.

  • Former Chester Co. Sheriff Underwood sentenced

    Alex Underwood, left, leaves the courthouse after sentencing on Monday.

    COLUMBIA – Alex Underwood has been sentenced to 46 months in prison.

    Underwood was found guilty on seven federal counts last year, but former Chester County Sheriff Alex Underwood conceded little at his sentencing on Monday.

    “I didn’t do anything wrong,” Underwood said.

    The former sheriff, removed from office by order of Gov. Henry McMaster in 2019 following his indictment, maintained that he was the victim of a racist witch hunt and overzealous government attorneys even as he was sentenced to 46 months in federal prison, three years of probation and ordered to pay nearly $30,000 in restitution. His sentencing took place at the Matthew Perry Federal Courthouse in Columbia in front of Judge Michelle Childs.

    William Miller, one of the lawyers that prosecuted Underwood in 2021, argued in favor of a stiff penalty on the high end of the recommended sentencing guideline of 46-57 months. A lenient sentence would lead the public to “question the validity” of the legal system and erode “trust of law enforcement,” he said.

    Underwood was originally elected as a petition candidate in 2012 (after he was one of hundreds of challengers statewide removed from the ballot over confusion regarding new filing requirements) and was overwhelmingly reelected in 2016.

    His eventual ouster was set into motion in November of 2018 on a dark, rural roadside on the eastern end of the county. There was a head-on collision with injury and one driver fled on foot. Nearby resident Kevin Simpson walked out into his yard and began livestreaming the scene via Facebook.

    Underwood approached him after a few minutes, told him there was a manhunt ongoing and to go to his porch. Simpson backed up, but eventually ventured back into his yard. The two had a second encounter when Underwood again told Simpson a manhunt was ongoing and again ordered him to go to his porch.

    Simspon complied with the command, but then told Underwood to “go manhunt” and to “do his job.” Underwood could be seen stopping in Simpson’s front yard as he walked back towards the road. He turned around, came onto Simpson’s porch, confronted him and asked him if he had anything to say.

    When Simpson repeated, “go manhunt,” Underwood informed him he was under arrest. At that point the camera shook wildly.

    Simpson was arrested for pubic disorderly conduct (though he never left his own yard) and resisting arrest. He spent three nights in jail, though records from that period demonstrated that others arrested for similar offenses bonded out in a day or less.

    Simpson’s mother was arrested later that night. Their charges were eventually dropped by South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson and the two later settled a civil trial out of court.

    Once Underwood was arrested on charges related to violating the civil rights of Simpson (and a related cover-up) more charges were forthcoming.

    He was accused of using on-duty sheriff’s office deputies to build a party barn and perform other improvements on his property. There were additional allegations of using his department to track and spy on his political enemies, of skimming money from off-duty deputies working ECHO DUI checkpoints funded by a federal grant administered locally by the Hazel Pittman Center, and of taking his wife on a trip to Reno in violation of county policy (while claiming on paperwork he was going with a deputy).

    Miller said Monday that Underwood “ripped Kevin Simpson off his porch and incarcerated him without just cause” and “ripped off a charity and stole from his subordinates.”

    Underwood had two attorneys (Stanley Myers and Jay Moore) speak on his behalf, along with half-a-dozen character witnesses. Myers said at the outset of his comments that Underwood was a leader and that “leaders are not always liked.” He maintained that his client had “done nothing improper.”

    On the night of the manhunt, Myers said Simpson was in the way while a search was ongoing for a potentially dangerous individual. In a separate statement, Moore actually called Simpson “a barking Chihuahua” that kept “pushing and pushing and pushing.”

    Moore said if Underwood violated Simpson’s civil rights, it was unintentional and a minor infringement. He said it didn’t compare to “firebombing a church in Alabama” or other offenses that made civil rights legislation necessary to begin with. Everything Underwood did that night, he did to protect the public, Moore said.

    Myers said race played a part in the case. He made reference to “the breakfast club,” a group of community leaders that meets for breakfast regularly at a local restaurant. Myers flatly called the group “racist,” said they were comprised solely of white men (“with no blacks and no women”) and they did not accept Underwood into their midst. He painted them as a powerful cabal that targeted Underwood because he is black and because he was “going against the powers that be.”

    Myers repeated the argument he made last year regarding Underwood having deputies work on the barn on his property. He said it was a display of leadership, that it was for the good of the community and that none of the deputies doing the work complained.

    Moore said the civil rights charges against Underwood were “like trying to squeeze Jello” and began to fall apart, so the government kept adding more and more charges. Myers said the evidence against Underwood was weak but that the “jury bought the argument that [Underwood was] the captain of the ship,” so he was must have been culpable somehow.

    Many other sheriffs have been arrested on charges similar to Underwood’s and all received sentences that ranged from one year and one day in jail to probation. All of those former sheriffs had something in common, he said, that “they didn’t look like” Underwood.

    Several people spoke on behalf of Underwood. Nettie Archie, who introduced herself as a community activist, said “the powers that be tried to destroy” Underwood, saying Chester County Council would not cooperate with him or give him what he needed to run his department.

    Two ministers spoke of Underwood’s character and love of community. Two former law enforcement cohorts said Underwood was well-respected, a good cop and that they could not imagine him having done the things he was accused of.

    Underwood’s wife Angel also spoke. She called the picture painted of her husband by prosecutors “a fictional character.” She, referenced the time Underwood was shot in the line of duty while working with SLED. A bullet-proof vest likely saved his life in that instance. He shot and killed the man, acting in the best interest and protection of the community, she said. She said not many people would take a bullet for someone they loved, much less a stranger.

    She also mentioned that the couple’s dog was poisoned and killed shortly after Underwood’s election while the two marched in an MLK parade.

    “That sent a clear message that he was not wanted,” she said.

    Her husband makes mistakes like anyone, she allowed, but always acted with good intentions and has always been “a great human being.” She is a Chester County magistrate currently suspended from the bench for improperly using her judicial email account to issue instructions to employees in the Chester County Sheriff’s Office while her husband served as sheriff and previously suspended for conflicts related to handling cases brought by her husband’s former office. Myers seemed to make reference to that in saying “they” had come after her as they had her husband.

    Underwood did not testify in his trial, but did speak in his own behalf Monday. He said when he first started in law enforcement, he could not arrest a white person and had memories of the Ku Klux Klan holding a rally on a local football field. He saw problems in law enforcement for people of color and said he tried to change things from the inside. His voice cracked and he wept briefly as he recalled the infamous 1991 beating of Rodney King by Los Angeles police officers. Using that as a backdrop, he said, “I’d never violate anyone’s civil rights.”

    He said on the night of the manhunt, he had reason to believe the man on the loose was armed and dangerous. He’d had a past experience (with SLED) when a man on the run murdered an innocent person in a barn. He didn’t want that to happen to anyone on the night of the wreck and subsequent manhunt, he said.

    He said as sheriff, he oversaw a decrease in crime and an uptick in arrests and convictions. He started programs to help youth and seniors and tried to flush out corruption himself, he said.

    “I apologize to you, to him (Miller) and the citizens but the things they talk about me aren’t true. I never meant to do anybody any harm, never retaliated against anybody, never forced anyone to do anything,” Underwood said.

    Myers concluded there was “no reason” Underwood should be behind bars. He compared him to Andy Griffith and said to sentence him to prison would not represent justice, it would represent a fulfillment of the wishes of “the racist breakfast club.”

    Miller said Underwood’s team was essentially trying to re-litigate the trial and was offering arguments already rejected by a jury. He said it was insulting to compare Simpson to a dog or to insinuate he “got what was coming to him.” The government’s case was built by going where the evidence led, “no matter who didn’t like it,” he said.

    While he said Underwood’s past service was admirable, he also said that service earned him a position of trust, which he abused. He said all of the theories offered by the defense related to “the breakfast club” were based on nothing and that no evidence had yet been produced to back Myers’ narrative.

    Before rendering the sentence, Judge Childs said that the comparison Myers brought up about past sheriffs really wasn’t valid, because many of them pled guilty and accepted plea deals to lesser charges, while Underwood did not. Many of them faced a single charge, not the seven as Underwood faced, which range from wire fraud to federal program theft and violation of civil rights.

    After sentencing him to 46 months in federal prison (followed by three years probation) and ordering him to pay nearly $30,000 in restitution, Childs allowed him the opportunity to voluntarily report to prison. Underwood will do so by September 15.

    Upon release from prison, he will have to pay $500 a month toward restitution, though she said the sum could be altered based on his ability to pay.

    His sentence will run concurrently with any time he should receive on pending state charges. Underwood asked that he not be sent to prison in South Carolina for safety reasons and Childs said she would attempt to accommodate that request. Underwood has 14 days to appeal his sentence.


    This story was published in The Chester News and Reporter: Underwood sentenced to 46 months in prison.

  • Commerce awards Winnsboro $640K grant

    WINNSBORO – The South Carolina Department of Commerce’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program has awarded the Town of Winnsboro a grant for $640,300 to upgrade its Jackson Creek wastewater treatment plant with a backup generator. 

    The generator will bring the plant in compliance with SC DHEC guidelines, and ensure the wastewater plant will continue to operate when power outages occur.

    “This grant is greatly appreciated,” said Winnsboro Town Manager Jason Taylor. “The State’s investment in Winnsboro will allow the Town to improve and expand the services that it provides to its customers.”

    Aside from providing the proper uninterrupted operations at the wastewater plant, the generator ensures that Town staff are free to restore power elsewhere during an emergency.

    Last winter, the Town had system wide power outages due to an ice storm. Without a backup generator at the wastewater plant, the electric department had to prioritize getting the power back online at the plant over its residential customers.

    “The generator will also ensure that the most vulnerable residents can get service restored more quickly in the future,” Taylor said.

  • Council OKs industrial zoning on Gum Springs Road

    WINNSBORO – “Compassion and rationale should be at the core of all your thinking,” Randy Bright said in his plea to county council Monday night to table the Gum Springs LLC rezoning request until there is further review.

    “You say you don’t have anyone [wanting to buy] this property, so what is your hurry to rezone it?” Bright asked.

    He spoke after five residents of the Gum Springs and Devil’s Race Track Roads area emotionally beseeched council to spare their properties from the rezoning of 392 adjoining acres from RD-1 (Rural Residential District) to I-1 (Industrial District.)

    Michael Branham spoke first about his property which was part of 300 acres that had been owned by his wife’s family for generations and borders the 392 acres.

    Paul Craig pointed out that his property and others surrounding the 392 acres make up an established residential neighborhood including new residential builds.

    “We are concerned about light and noise pollution and industrial pollution from a future industry,” Craig said, holding up his laptop screen showing the 392 acres clear cut to his property line. He asked how the rolling topography of the 392 acres could accommodate industry without disturbing the springs that feed the neighborhood water wells.

    Pelham Lyles asked council to restrict new industry to industrial sites the county already owns.

    “Why open the flood gates for growth that is not compatible with the area’s long established residential uses,” she asked. “One home on the road recently sold for over $600,000. Others along here are worth a half million dollars.”

    “Is this area of Fairfield County going to be a great place to work, play and stay?” asked resident Jeremy Harris. “One out of three is not bad, right?”

    Peter Gainey, who has lived on Gum Springs Road for 15 years, reminded council that the county’s planning commission voted 7-0 against recommending the rezoning.

    He quoted from page 129 of the county’s economic development group’s [guidelines],  that they “should protect property values and the environment from economic development and accommodate growth in an orderly manner.” He said there is nothing orderly about rezoning a tract of land that doesn’t need rezoning.

    County Administrator Malik Whitaker read from a prepared statement, saying the county ordinance would require buffering of 100 feet along Hwy 34 and 25 feet along Gum Springs and Devil’s Race Track Roads. He said the county could require more buffering depending on the type of industry that locates on the property.

    But he was not specific about the buffering requirements for the adjoining properties.

    Noting that Whitaker’s statement was the first time during the three rezoning discussions that the subject of buffering had been addressed by the county, Councilman Douglas Pauley asked that the rezoning request be tabled until another meeting could be held to give the residents time to ask questions and clarify Whitaker’s buffering information.

    Council Chairman Moses Bell pushed back against Pauley’s comments, drawing an analogy about how council, on July 8, 2019, had voted 5-2, with himself and Councilman Mikel Trapp voting against, to rezone 11 acres on Old Airport Road from RD (Rural Resource District) to I-1 (Industrial District) for the purpose of placing an incinerator on the property, “knowing”, Bell said, “that the incinerator would cause health issues to the public.”

    DHEC officials at the meeting denied Bell’s assessment.

    “But the incinerator is not there, correct?” Pauley asked.

    “It is not there but…” Bell said.

    “Once the citizens protested the incinerator, the vote was changed, correct?” Pauley asked.

    “The vote was changed after we went down there and looked,” Bell said.

    “But the vote was changed,” Pauley said.

    “Yes,” Bell said.

    “The incinerator is not there,” Pauley said.

    “No. But you voted to rezone it,” Bell insisted. “Did you vote?”

    Pauley pressed his point that council changed its course 7-0 after hearing from the citizens. The incinerator was never installed.

    [June 24, 2019 minutes: After second reading, Bell called for the issue to be tabled for further review. Council voted 7-0 to table.]

     “Ok,” Bell said, “Any other discussion?”

    After ignoring Pauley’s request to table the vote, council voted 4-2 to rezone the 392 acres for industry, with Pauley and Councilman Clarence Gilbert voting against. Councilman Tim Roseborough was absent.

  • Final vote to rezone Gum Springs property for industry set for July 11

    Standing on the property line of their family land, Mike and Margaret Branham worry that the owner of the 400 acres behind them, much of which is clear cut up to their family’s property line, is requesting the county to rezone that 400 acres from rural residential to industrial zoning. | Barbara Ball

    FAIRFIELD COUNTY – “It’s been about 20 years since my dad gave an easement across our property for access to a neighboring property.

    “My father, Jessie Douglas, didn’t charge for the easement, and he had to do some talking to get all the family members to sign the paperwork,” said Margaret Branham. “But he said it was the neighborly thing to do and he was happy to help out. Everybody signed.”

    Sometime around the middle of April this year, trucks and logging equipment rolled along that same easement on her family’s land to access the neighboring 400 acre property, bordered by Gum Springs Road and Devil’s Race Track Road, where they clear-cut much of the land up to the property lines of some of those same family members who signed documents to give that easement 20 years earlier.

     “About two weeks after the clearing was done,” Branham said, “a sign was posted for a rezoning request for the 400 acres where the trees were cut. The request was for county council to vote to change the zoning from RD-1 (Rural Residential District) property to I-1 (Industrial District).

    Margaret said it’s a bitter pill for her and her husband Mike to swallow that if the requested rezoning goes through, industry could be moving next door to their family’s land, and now there would be no buffer left to hide it.

    “If we had known that was coming, we might have had a chance to try to negotiate for wide tree buffers so, if industry moves next door to us, we would not have to look at it or use our own land to plant tree buffers. But we weren’t given the common courtesy of that chance.”

    According to a county staff report, the properties surrounding the neighboring 400 acres are zoned to the west: Rural Residential District (RD-1) and to the east, north and south: Rural Residential (RD-1), Industrial (I-1) and Business (B-2).

    While the County Planning Commission voted unanimously against recommending the rezoning of the 400 acres, that vote fell on deaf ears for the most part. Council has since passed two of three required readings and held a public hearing. The neighbors whose properties circle the 400 acre property that is seeking rezoning came to those meetings and spoke out, pleading for council not to vote for the rezoning which they fear will destroy their peaceful, rural way of life.

    Every vote cast was to approve the rezoning except for two –Councilmen Douglas Pauley and Clarence Gilbert voted against.

    The third and final vote is set for Monday night, July 11. (see meeting details below.)

    Zachariah Willoughby, project manager for the Fairfield County Economic Development office told The Voice Tuesday that, although much of the buffer area bordering neighboring properties has already been clear cut, when a property is rezoned industrial, the county requires nine-foot buffer zones and some up-scale landscaping.

    Asked if that would be enough to shield surrounding properties from the industrial facilities, Willoughby said the county can place some additional buffer restrictions over and above what the codes require.

    “Our goal would be so that the residents wouldn’t be able to see the industrial site, If it’s a deal that comes through our office, that the county is working on, we can require the industry to provide some additional lower growth and vegetation buffering,” Willoughby said.

    That information has not so far been offered by members of council, and the neighboring property owner has not been present at any of the meetings concerning the rezoning of the property.

    “We’re going to put a presentation together to show buffers that we would require for development,” Willoughby said. But he said he isn’t sure whether that additional buffering requirement would be included in next Monday’s vote or later when the industry acquires the property.

    “We’ll be looking at this on Monday,” he said.

    “At this point,” Margaret Branham told The Voice, “we’ve all fought hard, and I’m not giving up. But I don’t trust, at this point, that council is going to listen to us. I think they have their minds made up.

    “But there is something I hope,” Margaret Branham said. “I hope the county provides privacy for my family’s land and my neighbors’ properties, a wide enough buffering, at least 100 feet, so that we won’t have to live with the industry when it comes.”

    The final vote on the rezoning will be taken on July 11, in council chambers at the new county government complex, 350 Walnut Street in Winnsboro. The public will be allowed to address the rezoning request  at the beginning of the meeting.

  • Councilman Robinson answers JWC lawsuit

    WINNSBORO – Fairfield County wants a judge to toss a Jenkinsville Water Company lawsuit filed against the county and Councilman Neil Robinson because the litigation was improperly filed, according to court documents.

    Robinson

    But an attorney for the water company contests the county’s request to dismiss the case, saying a witness stated that Robinson conspired with former Councilwoman Bertha Goins to defame the JWC.

    Robinson and Goins “conspired to harm Jenkinsville Water Company by recruiting someone to come to a county council meeting and misrepresent that truth about the quality of Jenkinsville water,” said Columbia attorney Jeff Goodwyn, who’s representing the JWC.

    Filed in April, the lawsuit against Robinson alleges civil conspiracy. A separate defamation lawsuit against Goins is still pending.

    In lieu of filing a response, Fairfield County attorneys filed a motion to dismiss on May 23, stating in court papers that the JWC improperly pleaded civil conspiracy.

    “In order to properly pled [sic] the claim of civil conspiracy, Plaintiff must plead special damages of which describes damages that occurred as a result of the conspiracy,” the motion states.

    JWC lawyers didn’t do that, the motion continues.

    The motion states civil conspiracy is “actionable” only when overt acts relating to the conspiracy cause tangible damage to the plaintiffs.

    That also didn’t happen, according to court papers.

    “Plaintiff alleges Neil Robinson solicited persons to speak regarding their water quality at a Fairfield County Council meeting,” the motion states. “However, the person they alleged of being solicited actually never spoke. Therefore, there could not possibly be damages resulting therefrom.”

    Goodwyn disputed the county filing, stating a civil conspiracy still occurred. He said a witness testified that Robinson and Goins recruited the witness to publicly claim JWC water was tainted.

    “That person originally committed to do it, and at the last minute he backed out,” Goodwyn continued. “He realized that it was wrong.”

    Goodwyn said the witness was asked to bring in a sample of tainted water, but was unable to produce one.

    The witness further testified he then was asked to present any bottle of dirty water and claim it came from his house, according to Goodwyn.

    “That [the testimony] is what clued us in to what was going on,” he said.

    Goins

    Transcripts of the witness’s testimony were unavailable. Goodwyn said he plans to file a formal response to the county’s motion.

    Camden attorney Tommy Morgan, who’s representing Robinson and Goins, denied that his clients worked together to produce phony water samples.

    “Those allegations have no merit whatsoever, and are not supported by the record,” Morgan said.

    The JWC lawsuit also asserts Fairfield County is “vicariously liable” for Robinson’s activities.

    The suit against Goins states she made several public comments during government meetings, alleging tainted water. She later countersued, alleging the JWC was stifling her First Amendment free speech rights.

    There have been no new updates to the Goins suit since it was reinstituted to the docket in March.

    In the Robinson suit, the JWC accused the councilman of making statements that were “false, defamatory, and impugne [sic] the good reputation of the quality of its water.”

    The JWC also accused Robinson of working to coerce the water company to consolidate with other Fairfield County water providers.

    Fairfield’s motion to dismiss doesn’t reference efforts to consolidate water services, instead insisting the improperly filed lawsuit warrants its dismissal.

    “Defendants pray the Complaint against these Defendants be dismissed in its entirety,” the motion states. “Further, Defendants pray for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances.”

    Morgan said the motion to dismiss is “on solid legal grounds,” and his clients will continue to seek to swiftly end the litigation.

    “We believe the second lawsuit is nothing more than a continuation of the first lawsuit,” Morgan said. “Our motion to dismiss is based on the applicable statute of limitations. This lawsuit is without merit.”

  • Summer Work

    Photos: Anthony Montgomery

    HOPKINS – Westwood and Blythewood competed in Lower Richland’s second annual Diamond Hornet 7-on-7 Shootout on Thursday, June 30. Westwood is set to open their 2022 football season at Spring Valley on August 19. Blythewood will play at Ridge View on Aug. 19.

  • Fatal accident shuts down I-77

    Shelter in place has been lifted. I-77 Northbound is open

    Posted at 10:42 am

    FAIRFIELD COUNTY – A fatal accident occurred at about 4 a.m. Thursday at the 32 mile marker on I-77 near the peach road exit.

    According to Fairfield County Sheriff Will Montgomery, there is at least one fatality. 

    “We have traffic stopped at least a half mile from the accident in each direction on I-77 right now and we may be moving that out to one mile,” he said.

    Montgomery said the crash involved a car and a truck and that a substance the truck was carrying is on fire and has been burning since the crash happened. At this time he said it has not been determined what the substance is but authorities are on the scene.

    More information will be provided as it becomes available.