Andrea Fripp, center, and fellow council members Rich McKenrick, left, Donald Brock, and Erica Page, right, present the referendum to change Blythewood to a council-manager form of government. | Barbara Ball
BLYTHEWOOD – During a press conference held by four members of Blythewood Town Council Monday afternoon in front of Doko Manor, Town Councilwoman Andrea Fripp announced that the Town would be introducing an ordinance calling for a different form of government for the Town.
The ordinance was initiated by Fripp, Mayor Pro Tem Donald
Brock, and Council members Rich McKenrick and Erica Page. The ordinance calls
for the Town’s form of government to be changed from mayor-council to a council-manager
form of government in which the day-to-day operations of the town government
would be managed by a town administrator, who would still be hired council.
Fripp said council would vote on the first reading during
the regular monthly council meeting that followed the press conference.
Fripp said that while Blythewood is still small, it’s
growing.
“While Blythewood is
still a small town, to some, the changes that are happening and those to come
call for forward thinking as well as fair and balanced governing,” Fripp said.
“We are on the verge of an economic explosion in and around
our town,” she said. “As the elected body, we are charged with ensuring the
future is bright, prosperous, and equitable for all citizens,” she said.
Fripp pointed to cities that successfully operate under
council-manager forms of government, including: Columbia, Greenville,
Spartanburg, Anderson, Greer with BMW and Somerville with Volvo.
“Even our very own Richland County operates under a
council-administrator form of government.”
During questions from the media, Fripp was asked to address
whether a council-manager form of government might dilute the power of the
voters.
“I don’t know that anyone would feel that [Columbia’s] Mayor Rickenmann’s authority or his role is diminished at all by governing in a council-manager form of government,” Fripp said. “The mayor will still be the mayor, but I think that the council-manager form of government is more equitable.”
Council passes first vote for referendum
While most action items on the Blythewood Town Council agenda Monday night were deferred to the next meeting, Council did vote 4-1 for a referendum on a proposed ordinance to change the form of government in Blythewood from mayor-council to a council-manager form of government.
After a half-hour of pro and con comments from six members
of the public regarding an ordinance calling for a referendum on the question
of a change in the form of government, council voted 4-1 to approve it. Brock
and Councilmembers Rich McKenrick, Andrea Fripp, and Erica Page voted for the
ordinance. Griffin voted against.
The ordinance will require two readings (votes) by council.
The second reading is planned for Monday, May 26. A public hearing will be held
at that meeting. If the ordinance passes, a 90-day process will follow. There
will be a 30-day pause and another 60 days to execute with the referendum
falling sometime in August.
A small crowd of families enjoyed inflatables and food trucks prior to the start of Jumanji. The fighting broke out soon after.
BLYTHEWOOD – When fights broke out among a large group of teens at the Town’s Movies in the Park event last Saturday night, April 26, four juveniles – at least two of whom were females, according to town hall sources – were charged with Breach of Peace and Affray (fighting in a public place), but not arrested. According to the Sheriff’s Department, the teens were released to their parents.
“All of the subjects are juveniles and because of their ages
they were not arrested,” Richland County PIO Jennifer Spurrier stated in an
email to The Voice. “Instead, deputies filed Petitions to Family Court to
charge them. Many laws have age limits
to where law enforcement cannot arrest the juvenile but instead will file a
petition with the Family Court effectively “charging” the juvenile with a
crime,” Spurrier stated.
According to the Guide to Juvenile Court in South Carolina,
published online by the University of South Carolina Children’s Law Center,
juveniles are not arrested. Instead, petitions are filed with the family court
where it is determined whether the allegations in the petition are true beyond
a reasonable doubt. The case is either dismissed with a finding of not guilty
or a predisposition evaluation is required (unless the juvenile receives
probation) in which case a judge decides the outcome for the charges.
It is the fourth incident since last summer in the town that
resulted in teen fighting, arrests, charges, shootings, or injuries.
Teen fights resulting in injuries and arrests erupted during
the annual July 3rd fireworks celebration in Doko Park last summer. Teen
fighting terrified moviegoers at the March 22 Movies in the Park event. And 60+
rounds of gunfire resulted in a person being shot and five arrests when,
according to Sheriff Leon Lott, 200 teens swarmed downtown Blythewood on April
5.
While council members were divided on whether to cancel the
April 26 Movies in the Park event, Blythewood Mayor Sloan Griffin posted the
following statement on the Town’s Facebook page last week prior to Saturday’s
event.
“As we prepare for the April 26 ‘Movies in the Park’ event
at Doko Meadows Park, I want to take a moment to emphasize that your safety and
peace of mind remain our top priorities,” Griffin posted on Facebook. “In
partnership with the Richland County Sheriff’s Department, we are implementing
enhanced security protocols to ensure a family-friendly and secure environment
for all who attend.”
With patrol cars on site and several deputies in the area where large groups of teens were congregating, the fights broke out within 15 minutes after the start of the movie. Terrified parents ran from the park with their tots in tow. Councilwoman Erica Page ordered the movie shut down.
Those charged “were detained and questioned on the incident
that occurred.” the Sheriff’s report stated. “It is very unclear what caused
the fight but [redaction] mentioned that [redaction] and her friends jumped her
out of nowhere and she was not even there to fight but to watch the movie.”
Two other teens were also charged.
“Me and the other deputies that were there was (sic) able to
detain two suspects that had a (sic) involvement in the incident [redaction]
where both were detained and questioned [redaction] were not [there to] fight
one another, they just happened to be the ones that got caught in the same area
due to their friends knowing one another,” a second report stated. “No story
was made clear on why the fight took place or any information on how the
parties knew each other,” the report stated.
During a regularly scheduled town council meeting Monday
night, the issue was not on the mayor’s agenda.
Near the end of the meeting Councilman Rich McKenrick asked that it be discussed and that council go ahead and vote to shut down the Movies in the Park, the Rocking Red, White, and Blue July 4 fireworks event, and the Juneteenth event for the safety of the community until the town events could be made safe. Griffin suggested moving such a discussion and vote to a later date. Council decided on May 19 at The Manor at 6 p.m.
The issue was on the agenda for the Wednesday, April 30 special called budget meeting that was held shortly after The Voice went to press. Read about that meeting here.
BLYTHEWOOD – Rezoning requests for three large-acre Blythewood 29016 properties will come before the Richland County Council for a public hearing on Tuesday, March 25. The first of three required votes on the rezoning will be taken at that meeting. Of the three required meetings, this March 25 meeting is the only one where the public will be allowed to speak for or against the proposed rezonings.
Commercial Zoning
Applicant DuBose Williamson is requesting the rezoning of a 14.03-acre
property at the intersection of Wilson Blvd. and Turkey Farm Road where the developer
proposes to bring commercial and retail businesses. Williamson is asking county
council to approve the rezoning from HM/RT (Homestead/Residential Transition)
to GC (General Commercial) which allows commercial and retail development on
the site.
The county’s planning staff and the planning commission both recommended
against the rezoning.
Four Blythewood residents spoke out against the rezoning at
the Feb. 3 planning commission meeting.
“The water from this particular property is going to hit
Hawkins Creek watershed,” said nearby resident Jeanette Robinson. “My property
is at the end of this watershed and every time a development is approved on
this watershed, my property gets hammered. It is being severely damaged. I have
begged this county to stop the nonsense.”
Robinson said there is a conservation easement just above
her property and that the drainage from the watershed drains through that
conservation.
“That conservation easement was put there to preserve,” she
told council members. “Richland County is not doing a good job preserving. The
county does not have sufficient infrastructure to accommodate the traffic from
this proposed development. I don’t know when the county is going to look at its
infrastructure instead of just rubberstamping everything,” Robinson said.
The Planning Commission voted 5-2 against recommending the
requested GC rezoning to council, who will hear the proposal on March 25.
100’s of Homes
Representative for the developer, consultant Brandon
Pridemore, appearing before the Richland County planning commission on Feb. 3,
requested that a 198.84-acre property at 800 Mount Valley Road combined with a
64.84 acre property at 812 Mount Valley Road be rezoned from AG (Agriculture)
to R3 (Residential 3). The developer proposes to build 600 single-family homes
on the two properties.
The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan for the two
large-acre parcels at 800 and 812 Mount Valley Road designates this area as
Neighborhood (low density). The county’s planning staff concluded that these
properties should not be rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to R3 (Residential 3)
because R3 zoning is not compliant with the objectives for Neighborhood (low
density) zoning.
While the applicant conceded that the requested R3 zoning
does not comply with the comprehensive plan, he said he’s looking at the big
picture of what’s happening in that area with Scout’s arrival.
“These properties are within half a mile of Scout and we
felt this would be a good opportunity to supplement the housing needs that will
probably be coming with Scout,” Pridemore has not been clear about the number
of units per acre the developer plans to build but says it will be relatively
low density. What we’re building will be complimentary to what’s there.”
Mount Valley resident Mark Johnson and other neighbors agreed
that a lot of development and expansion is going on because of Scout.
“But a lot of us that live here don’t want that additional
traffic and neighborhoods,” Johnston said. “These two parcels are fed by dirt
roads and most homes in the area sit on 3-5 acres. We enjoy the rural, the
woods, and the animals.”
Johnson pushed back against what Pridemore said would amount
to low density development, noting that R3 zoning allows the developer to build
up to 6 homes to the acre and 1,800 homes for the entire development.
The planning commission agreed with the residents, voting
6-1 for disapproval of the proposed rezoning of both Mount Valley parcels.
To speak for or against the rezoning requests, citizens
should arrive about 15 minutes early to sign up to address council. The meeting
will be held at 7 p.m., Tuesday, March 25, in Columbia at 2020 Hampton Street,
in county council chambers.
FAIRFIELD COUNTY – A groundbreaking ceremony will be held Wednesday, March 26, at 2 p.m. for the start of construction of the Winnsboro Connector Line Project. This line is being paid for with a $10M SCIIP grant from the SC Rural Infrastructure Authority.
When completed, the line will supplement some of the wastewater capacity needs of Fairfield County with the connector line to the Winnsboro Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The groundbreaking ceremony will be held at the FJWSS Winnsboro Connector Pump Station, 399 E. Peach Rd., Ridgeway, SC 29130.
WINNSBORO – Following adjournment of the Feb. 10 Fairfield County Council meeting, Clerk to Council Kimberly Roberts handed out to all council members a list of the 2025-26 appointees to council’s five standing committees.
County Council Chairman Clarence Gilbert made the
appointments – a chair and two members for each committee – as required by the
council’s bylaws.
The lion’s share of Gilbert’s appointments, 14 out of 15
available seats, went to only four of the seven council members – Gilbert,
Douglas Pauley, Carl Bell and Oren Gadson. The 15th seat, which is on the
Presentation Committee, is not appointed, but rotates among all council
members, depending on the district a presentation concerns.
Gilbert appointed himself to three of the five committees
and as chair of two of them.
Gilbert did not appoint council members Dan Ruff, Peggy
Swearingen or Don Goldbach to any of the standing committees. The three will
only be eligible to serve on a session of the Presentation Committee if a
citizen or organization from their district requests to make a presentation to
council.
Excluding certain council members from council’s standing
committees comes at a time when both Bell and Gilbert have repeatedly made
public calls for unity, cooperation, and collaboration among council members.
Shortly before the list of appointees was distributed after
the Feb. 10 council meeting, Bell stated during county council time: “We have
to work with each other. It’s important we stay in tune with each other. We
have to support one another in responding to the needs of our individual
districts. It is the reason we were
elected.”
However, for over a week, Bell has failed to speak out
against Gilbert’s arbitrary exclusion of certain council representatives from
being appointed to any of the standing committees.
In answer to an email The Voice sent to Ruff, Swearingen and
Goldbach on Monday, Feb. 17, asking why they were not appointed to any of the
committees, Goldbach said he had specifically asked to be put on at least one
committee and was hoping to be appointed to several, but was skipped over for
all of them. He said there was no response to his request to be on a committee,
and that he had not been contacted concerning the appointments before he was
handed the list of appointments last week.
Swearingen responded that she, too, had expected to be
appointed to one or more committees and was not contacted by Gilbert prior to
his release of the list of appointments.
“It surprised me that I wasn’t listed on any of the
committees, not even the ones I was already on.” Swearingen said. “I can’t
recall a time when every council member was not appointed to at least one
standing committee.”
Ruff had served as chair of the Public Services and Development committee until Gilbert appointed Pauley as chair of that committee last week, leaving Ruff out. Ruff has not yet responded to The Voice’s email asking whether he declined to continue serving or was passed over by Gilbert for re-appointment.
According to the council’s bylaws, “The chair of county
council shall appoint the members and the chairs of the following standing committees:
Administration and Finance Committee; Public Affairs and Policy Committee;
Public Services and Development Committee; and the Economic Development
Committee.” The Presentation Committee
is not mentioned in the bylaws.
“Once appointed for the year, no member of a committee may be removed by the chair of council without the approval of council,” the bylaws state.
Gilbert has not yet responded to an email sent from The Voice on Tuesday asking why Ruff, Swearingen, and Goldbach did not receive appointments to any of the standing committees.
Gilbert’s 2025-26 Standing Committee Picks
Administration & Finance
Clarence Gilbert – Chairman
Doug Pauley
Carl Bell
Economic Development
Doug Pauley – Chairman
Clarence Gilbert
Oren Gadson
Public Services & Development
Doug Pauley – Chairman
Oren Gadson
Carl Bell
Public Affairs & Policy
Carl Bell – Chairman
Doug Pauley
Oren Gadson
Presentation Committee
Clarence Gilbert – Chairman
Carl Bell
Rep. of District from which the request originates
WINNSBORO – During the Feb. 17 Fairfield County Council meeting, Fairfield County Sheriff’s Chief Deputy Brad Douglas said the Sheriff’s Office is already working on its budget for fiscal year 2025-26, and that he has serious concerns as to whether the department can safely sustain its services in the county until the new budget year begins July 1, 2025.
Critical Situation
“We’re in a critical situation with our vehicles,” Douglas
told council members. “We’ve had to rent vehicles because we had no available
spares. We’ve had situations arise where on-call officers’ vehicles broke down
when they were responding to scenes. In one particular instance, an
investigator – who’s assigned vehicle had previously broken down, leaving him
stranded on the side of the road – was responding to a call of a deceased
person when the spare vehicle he was driving also broke down, again leaving him
stranded. An off-duty investigator had to be called in to respond.”
“Officer safety is a
real concern for us,” Sheriff Will Montgomery said. “I want to make sure that
we are putting our deputies in vehicles that allow them to do their jobs safely
and efficiently. Our responsibility is to provide the law enforcement services
to our citizens that they deserve, and to provide effective public safety for
the entire county. We need safe and dependable vehicles to do that and, right
now, we don’t have that.”
Douglas said the department has been low on vehicles for
two-and-a-half years.
“During that time, we were also down over 15 deputies – over
25 percent of our department’s manpower – so the lack of vehicles was not as
impactful then since we didn’t have the deputies to drive them,” Douglas said.
Now that the department is almost fully staffed, Douglas
said the full effects of its vehicle crisis is being felt.
“We recently secured an SRO grant for three SRO vehicles
which has freed up three older marked patrol cars that we can add to our patrol
fleet, but that really doesn’t put a dent in our aging fleet,” he said.
High Mileage, Aged Vehicles
Going into detail, Douglas said that 48 patrol cars – not
including spares – have over 100,000 miles; 14 of those have over 150,000
miles; and four of those have over 200,000 miles. Douglas said twenty-six of
these vehicles are 10-15 years old.
“All of these vehicles are driven every day and present a
number of serious safety hazards,” Douglas said. “High mileage vehicles are
more prone to engine, brake, and transmission failure which can compromise the
vehicles’ performance during emergency response situations.
“And these high miles are not normal high miles. They’re
much harder miles and take an unnatural toll on the vehicles,” he said. “These
miles are run up under heavy and stressful use, sometimes at high speeds over
prolonged shifts.”
Douglas pointed out that these are actually the department’s
better vehicles.
“Our specialized unit vehicles – criminal Investigations,
civil process/Court security, narcotics, etc. – are in even worse condition,”
he said. “Some have over 200,000 miles, with most falling into the 150,000+
miles range.
“We have historically had a pool of spare vehicles with 4WD
capabilities for severe weather events when our deputies are often responsible
for transporting essential personnel –
911 dispatchers, Board of Disabilities staff, nursing home staff, etc –
if they are unable to get to their places of work,” Douglas said.
He said the department’s ability to transport these
personnel was significantly compromised during the recent cold weather events.
“We had to rely on overtime to get those few deputies –
whose vehicles are equipped with 4WD – to assist in providing these services.”
High Cost of Repairs
Douglas said older, high mileage vehicles lead to more
repairs.
“We’ve already gone well over our vehicle maintenance budget
this year just to keep our deputies in running vehicles,” he said. “This past
year, we’ve put new transmissions in several vehicles that are over 10 years
old, and we’ve put new engines in even older cars.”
Douglas said the department is going to have to paint some
of its vehicles that are over 10 years old because, he said, “they are
embarrassingly unprofessional looking.”
“This is glaringly evident when we work with neighboring
agencies,” he said.
With a sustained call volume and increasing
responsibilities, Douglas said the department’s work load is only going to get
heavier and the need for reliable vehicles greater.
A Better Option
“Over the last five fiscal years, we’ve received 18 new
vehicles (excluding grant-funded vehicles and replaced wrecked vehicles),
that’s an average of 3.3 new vehicles per year.
“Continuing this trend has us retiring our vehicles at
approximately 15 years of age. If the county continues to purchase vehicles the
way that we always have, we will continue to live on the edge of these
vehicles’ capabilities by running them until they literally fall apart,”
Douglas said. “We will always be in this crisis and without the ability to
properly protect our citizens.
“There’s a much better option that we hope the county will
consider,” he said. “We’ve identified a leasing program that many agencies (big
and small) are going to. This is a system that ensures that safe, dependable,
and professional-looking vehicles are always in service. While initial costs
are slightly higher, these programs demonstrate that they effectively offset
these costs through far fewer maintenance costs/issues and higher resale values
which we receive credit for.
“We would love to have an opportunity to have a leasing
vendor give a presentation for county council and the administration to
consider,” Douglas said.
Only Council members Don Goldbach and Peggy Swearingen had
input and asked questions concerning the leasing program. After they spoke,
Council Chair Clarence Gilbert said he would be willing to sit down and discuss
the department’s vehicle needs.
Settlement Ends Approximately $1M in Payouts and Legal Fees
In June, 2021, newly hired Ashley Hunter, owner and CEO of MPA Strategies, announced a $10K International Paper Company grant to the Town. Shown here are, from left: Councilmen Sloan Griffin, Donald Brock, Hunter, Eddie Baughman, Mayor Bryan Franklin and then-Councilman Larry Griffin. Less than a month later, council voted 3-1 to terminate her contract with the Town. | Barbara Ball
BLYTHEWOOD – The last of two lawsuits filed by Ashley Hunter, CEO of MPA Strategies LLC, against the Town of Blythewood has been settled, all but closing the door on the Town’s almost four-year soap opera that one columnist described as the Town “making a mountain of public debt out of a molehill of personal spite.”
Another lawsuit filed by Hunter and a countersuit filed by the Town against Hunter had already been settled.
How It All Started
The most protracted and expensive legal battle in the Town’s history set sail on Feb. 22, 2021, after town council voted 3-2 to contract with MPA Strategies LLC instead of the Greater Blythewood Chamber of Commerce to provide marketing services and grant writing for the Town.
Mayor Bryan Franklin, who cast one of the two losing votes, and the Chamber leadership, which lost the bid for the contract, sallied forth in an almost four-year effort to bring Hunter, and those they accused of conspiring with her, to their knees.
During those years, Councilman Donald Brock, The Voice publisher Barbara Ball, and to some extent, then-Councilman Sloan Griffin – Hunter’s alleged co-conspirators – suffered a steady barrage of unsubstantiated accusations, withering public tirades, and myriad other attempts by some members of the Town and Chamber leadership to intimidate.
Defamation Settlement
According to the settlement agreement, signed Dec. 20, 2024, the South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Financing Fund, on behalf of the Town of Blythewood, agreed to pay $122,000 to Hunter in exchange for releasing the Town, its elected officials and employees from all claims concerning a defamation lawsuit Hunter filed against Franklin in January, 2023.
The settlement included a further stipulation that the Town of Blythewood re-issue (to Hunter) a check in the amount of $6,400, which had been tendered to MPA Strategies, LLC in August of 2021, for work Hunter had performed for the Town. That check was never negotiated because the Town placed it into escrow after it abruptly terminated Hunter’s contract on Aug. 28, 2021, in violation of the contract’s stipulations, according to Hunter’s attorney Paul Porter with Cromer, Babb, and Porter law firm. After a year in escrow, the original check was no longer negotiable.
2023 Settlement
The Dec. 20, 2024 settlement came a year to the week after The Town paid out $36,000 on Dec. 28, 2023 for Hunter’s legal fees to settle a Freedom of Information lawsuit that she filed against the Town on June 28, 2021, seeking declaratory relief for Franklin’s alleged Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) violations. State Statute 30-4-110(E) states that a settlement or conviction awarded for the prevailing person or entity in an FOIA lawsuit is restricted to reasonable attorney’s fees or other costs of litigation.
In addition to the payout to Hunter in the 2023 settlement, the Town also agreed to drop 10 counterclaims it had filed July 20, 2021 against MPA and that it (the Town) had paid at least four attorneys to aggressively prosecute.
The counterclaims accused Hunter of, among other things, fraud, civil conspiracy, SC Unfair Trade Practices, Federal False Claims, and Gross Negligence. The counterclaims did not include any supporting evidence, but they did include numerous inuendoes and significant inferences that Brock, Griffin, and Ball were co-conspirators in Hunter’s alleged scheme. According to Porter, the counterclaims were highly unusual and had serious legal and factual problems from the outset.
Who Won? Who Lost?
In the end, the Town gained nothing.
It is estimated the Town and its insurance provider paid out approximately $1,000,000 over the MPA legal war, including total payouts of $164,400 to settle Hunter’s two lawsuits and the Town’s countersuit and at least $800,000 in legal fees. The total of the Town’s fees and costs associated with the lawsuits has never been released to the public by the Town.
At the forefront of Franklin’s 2023 re-election bid for mayor, was his promise to keep stoking the fire under the MPA lawsuits. He lost the election in a landslide defeat to then-Councilman Sloan Griffin who promised to fire the Town’s attorneys and settle the lawsuits.
The Town’s former lead attorney in MPA’s FOIA lawsuit and the Town’s countersuit, David Black, was ultimately fired by the new town government. Prior to Black’s firing, the two powerhouse law firms he was affiliated with, Nexsen Pruet that later became Maynard Nexsen, were paid approximately $500,000 by the Town with public money from the general fund.
Blythewood Attorney Shannon Burnett, who served on the Town’s legal team, was also fired by the new government and was paid $238,753 of the public’s money from the general fund, according to documents released by Town Hall.
David Black
Phil Frye
Bryan Franklin
Hunter Files for Sanctions Against Black
The last remaining remnant of this legal debacle is a motion that Hunter filed in January, 2024 – which is still pending – calling for the court to sanction Black.
Hunter’s call for sanctions stems from Black’s refusal to withdraw from the case even after he was fired on Dec. 11, 2023 by the Town’s newly elected Mayor Sloan Griffin. Black also refused to file the December, 2023 MPA/Town of Blythewood settlement agreement with the Court after it was agreed to and signed by both parties. Black’s delay caused Hunter to lose a high-level crisis communication certification that, she said, impacted her earnings significantly.
Black argued that the MPA lawsuits should continue – against the wishes of the current majority council – in order to protect the Town’s best interest.
Porter countered that [The Town’s] “best interest” is lawfully determined by council [town council], not their counsel [attorney] or a special referee.
“This is how democracy works,” Porter wrote in a motion in opposition to a motion filed by Black to Appoint a Special Master to oversee the lawsuits, a move that the current mayor and council said could effectively block them from making decisions for the Town concerning MPA.
“This case was heavily covered by the local media in Blythewood,” Porter wrote in his Jan. 2, 2024, Motion to Enforce Settlement.
“Constitutional provisions vest [the Town’s] citizens with the right to select their government and representatives. The Town’s citizens did so in November, 2023 when they elected a new mayor and town council,” Porter wrote. “In doing so, the Town’s citizens rejected elected officials who supported the continuation of this legal action in favor of candidates who opposed it.
“Maynard Counsel (Black) does not have any authority to disregard the will of the voters and their elected council,” Porter said.
“Defendant’s record counsel (Black) was not elected. Defendant’s town council was. Whether or not to settle a case is the choice of the client, not their lawyer,” Porter wrote. “The ethical rules of professional conduct make this clear,” he said, quoting: ‘A lawyer shall abide by a client’s decision whether to make or accept an offer of settlement of a matter.’”
“Maynard Counsel wants to disregard the instructions of its client’s democratically elected decision-makers in order to continue this costly and unnecessary litigation over the objection of the Defendant (Town), who presumably will continue to be billed [by Maynard Counsel] for time spent on continuing this litigation,” said Porter. “This is shocking.”
The Voice reached out to former Mayor Bryan Franklin, Councilmen Donald Brock and Rich McKenrick, and former Chairman of the Chamber Phil Frye for comment. Only Frye responded (after press time), but declined to comment.
Who is Ashley Hunter?
Ashley Hunter is the owner and CEO of MPA Strategies LLC, a full-service marketing and grant writing business that was named the 2024 Best Marketing Firm in South Carolina by the Guide to South Carolina.
Located in Cayce, MPA’s clients have included the cities of Rock Hill, Florence, Camden, Mullins, Westminster, Batesburg-Leesburg, and Lake City, as well as the Cayce-West Columbia Chamber of Commerce, the SC Bar, and a number of law firms, political candidates, associations, businesses and individuals.
Prior to starting MPA Strategies in 2011, Hunter, a South Carolina native, spent six years working for the largest association management and lobbying firm in the state. She was selected for The State Newspapers “Top 20 Under 40ʺ in 2012 and named one of the 2018 Women of Influence by the Columbia Regional Business Report. In 2021, Hunter was named an SC Phenom by the Columbia Regional Business Journal.
Hunter is the former Chairman of the Board for the Healing Families Foundation, and a volunteer Guardian ad Litem for Richland County. She served as a lobbyist for the Municipal Association of SC, and is certified by FBI-LEEDA in Media and Public Relations (MPR).
Hunter, a single mom, resides in the City of Cayce with her two daughters.
COLUMBIA – The Richland County Planning commission heard a request Monday night, Dec. 2, for a rezoning that would allow as many as 300 apartment units on almost 20 acres located on Wilson Boulevard immediately south of Turkey Farm Road. The address of the 19.8-acre property is 10141 Wilson Boulevard (TMS # R14800-05-11).
In a 6 – 2 vote, the commission made a recommendation to
Richland County Council to disapprove of the request. However, the commission’s
recommendation is non-binding on county council which will take the first of
three votes on the matter at a zoning public hearing to be held at 6 p.m., on
Tuesday, Dec. 17, at the county council chambers, 2020 Hampton Street in
Columbia.
The applicant, DuBose Williamson, representing Canvas Residential
Partners out of Charlotte, is requesting the property be rezoned from HM
(Homestead) zoning classification to GC (General Commercial) zoning which would
allow for multi-family living units as well as commercial development and light
industrial uses.
According to Richland County Zoning Director Geo Price, the
parcel lies within the neighborhood low density designation of the county’s
comprehensive plan, and is not located within a neighborhood activity center as
prescribed by the comprehensive plan.
“The staff recommends ‘Disapproval’,” Price said, “because
the requested zoning is not consistent with the recommendations of the
comprehensive plan.”
In an email to The Voice, Price also clarified that the
rezoning request is for the General Commercial (GC) zoning designation.
“Any uses permitted outright within the GC zoning district
would be allowed on the parcel,” Price wrote. “While the applicant has
expressed an intent to establish a multi-family use on the property, approval
of the requested rezoning does not limit the applicant to this specific use.”
Granting the rezoning request would allow not only the 300
apartments, but it would allow the property owner to use the land for a broad
range of almost 100 commercial uses characterized primarily by retail, office,
and service establishments, in a primarily automobile-oriented environment,
according to the county’s planning staff’s report. Those permitted uses include
fleet terminals, service stations, heavy vehicle wash facilities, as well as
manufacturing, assembly, and light fabrication.
Based upon a gross density calculation, the maximum number
of units for this site is approximately 317 dwelling units, according to the
staff report.
Robinson
The area where the 19.8-acre property is located is primarily characterized by undeveloped parcels, and residential properties. Eight Blythewood residents who live in proximity to the parcel spoke out Monday night against the rezoning.
Fourth generation owner of property on nearby Folk Road,
Janet Robinson, told the commission they must stop approving development within
the Hawkins Branch watershed.
“It’s imperative that this county learns from what happened
in 2015,” Robinson said. “My property has been irreparably damaged because of
this kind of development permitted in the watershed. This is irresponsible
development and has to stop.”
Didyoung
Longtime Turkey Farm Road resident Glen Didyoung said he recognizes growth is coming, but called for smart growth that maintains the integrity of the existing area landscape.
“Smart growth considers the consequences of inappropriate
rezoning,” Didyoung said. “To inappropriately alter the landscape of the
neighborhood by changing the zoning and to fit a plan – that doesn’t fit – into
the landscape of the area is not smart growth. Apartments and businesses don’t
fit in this neighborhood.”
Ryan Copeland said he’s only lived in Blythewood for four years, and enjoys the peace and quiet of his neighborhood.
Copeland
“I want to protect the integrity of this area,” Copeland
said. “The density of 300 apartments would equate to 450 additional cars – a
lot of development in this area has not been planned well.”
Westwood High School is located on Sharpe Road West,
approximately 3/4 of a mile southwest of the subject parcel.
The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan, “PUTTING THE PIECES IN PLACE”, designates this area as Neighborhood (Low Density). Low-density, single-family neighborhood developments are preferred in this area, the staff report states.
Price told the commission that the planning department’s staff recommends ‘Disapproval’ of this map amendment as it is not consistent with the 2015 Comprehensive Plan recommendations.
Robin Dozier
“Although the proposed map amendment would allow for retail
and commercial uses along a primary road,” Price said, “the subject site is not
located within a Neighborhood Activity Center and is not within a
contextually-appropriate distance from an intersection, as prescribed by the
Comprehensive Plan.
The issue will be on the Richland County Council’s Dec. 17
agenda for a rezoning public hearing and the first of three votes council will
take on the rezoning. That is the last chance the public will have to publicly
address council concerning the proposed development. Those wishing to address
council about the rezoning should arrive a few minutes early to sign up to
speak. The public will not be allowed to speak at the two meetings where the
last two votes are taken.
Council chambers are located in the Richland County
government building, 2020 Hampton Street in Columbia.
BLYTHEWOOD – Three weeks ago, Mayor Sloan Griffin unilaterally hired a deputy administrator who, The Voice has learned via Google, is under criminal investigation by SLED (State Law Enforcement Division).
Griffin hired Tiffany Cooks on Nov. 7 as the Town was searching for an assistant town administrator. He announced her hiring in an email on Monday, Nov. 18, 2024
Town Administrator Daniel Stines had formed a search committee the first of September, 2024, composed of the mayor, the town marketing manager, the town administrator, and two Manor employees.
Griffin
After interviewing 16 applicants, the committee offered the job to one then another of the three finalists. The first choice, then the second choice applicants turned the job down in succession after each accepted counter offers from their current employers.
Griffin then dispensed with the committee and the remaining 14 applicants and took over the search, himself, settling on Cooks, who had not applied for the job. Griffin notified council members and town hall staff of the hiring in an email. Griffin also decided to change Cooks’ title from assistant town administrator to deputy town administrator.
Cooks had applied for the town administrator’s job earlier this year but, by law, council hires that position, and the majority of council did not select Cooks.
A native of Buffalo, NY, Cooks was elected Williamsburg County supervisor in 2018, but was defeated when she ran for reelection in 2022.
A Google search revealed that Cooks had been accused of while serving as Williamsburg county supervisor, and that she is under investigation by SLED.
A spokesperson with SLED told The Voice on Monday, Nov 18, that Cooks is being investigated, but would not disclose any other information about the investigation except to say that it had been prompted by a call from Kelvin Washington, Cooks’ successor as the Williamsburg County supervisor, on Feb. 10, 2023, to investigate the case. The investigation was formally opened on Feb. 28, 2023.
When The Voice asked Griffin about Cooks giving herself multiple financial supplements in her position as Williamsburg County Supervisor, he dismissed the issue, saying, “Wasn’t that during a natural disaster? You have to go back and look at the dates to see if they were under Federal declaration.”
To that end, Griffin shared a Facebook comment posted by Cooks in July, 2024, about the overtime pay in question. It said, in part: “As per page 13 of the county policy approved in 2015, the County Supervisor can approve overtime for both exempt and non-exempt employees during declared and undeclared disasters.”
The Voice has been unable to reach Cooks for comment.
“There are some places where they have to give overtime to all staff in order to qualify for certain funds,” Griffin said. “But I’m not going to get too deep into that stuff. I’m not worried about it. If something comes out, something comes out …this is just stuff like MPA. It’s too much politics. She [Cooks] hasn’t been indicted on anything,” he said.
In a press release that Griffin sent Nov 18, announcing Cook’s hiring to The Voice, the Minority Eye website, the Blythewood town administrator, the town’s attorney, town clerk and marketing employee, he noted that Cooks holds a Bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice, a Master of Business Administration with a concentration in Leadership from Ashford University, and a Ph.D. in Philosophy focusing on Applied Management and Decision Science from Walden University.
“As Deputy Town Administrator, Dr. Cooks will oversee critical operations, spearhead grant initiatives, and work closely with the mayor and local stakeholders to implement strategic growth and enhance community services,” the release stated.
Asked to comment on Cook’s hiring process, Councilwoman Andrea Fripp declined.
“I will refrain from commenting on the appointment, by the Mayor, of Dr. Cooks until the conclusion of the SLED investigation,” Fripp said.
Councilman Rich McKenrick and Mayor Pro Tem Donald Brock felt differently.
“It would be my hope that our Town government follow established procedures while hiring for any town position,” McKenrick said when contacted by The Voice. “Our town leaders should be looking for the most qualified individuals through the interview process and consider all available information when considering a candidate, specifically, in this particular matter, an ongoing SLED investigation that has been publicized repeatedly for some time in the media.”
Brock said he had questions not only about the candidate’s circumstances, but about the hiring process in general.
“It’s my position that the hiring of Ms. Cooks under these circumstances is quite concerning. I have numerous questions for the mayor regarding this hire and look forward to having them answered,” said Brock. “The SLED investigation not withstanding, the fact that it appears that the hiring process was circumvented is also concerning.
“I feel these questions must be addressed by the entire governing body. We are the stewards of the Town and must be diligent in all aspects of the Town’s operations,” Brock said.
Councilwoman Erica Page did not respond to The Voice’s request for comment.
Cooks currently serves as the town administrator for the Town of Estill, SC, where she spearheaded transformative projects, including the $250 million ‘Project Green Spark,’ aimed at economic and community development, according to the mayor’s press release.
Asked if Cooks, who will be paid $90,000 annually, would report to Town Administrator Daniel Stines, Griffin said she would report to both Stines and the mayor. Stines, who previously served as the Town’s interim administrator, is paid an annual salary of $107,000.
Griffin said Cooks will report to work at Blythewood town hall on Jan. 13, 2025. He said she has 27 years of experience in public safety, local government and emergency management as well as an exceptional record of academic and professional achievements.
During an interview with The Voice about his hiring of Cooks, Griffin said that, as strong mayor, he will be doing the hiring for all town hall employees, and that Stines will hire employees for public works positions and other similar jobs.
WINNSBORO – At 10 a.m. Friday morning, the Fairfield County
Election Commission reviewed 24 provisional ballots and one fail safe ballot
(that were cast on election day) to determine their validity. The result of
that review and determination failed to change the results of Tuesday’s
election.
Don Goldbach, who had a 10-vote lead over Ann Corrao in the
race on Election Day for Dist. 2 county council seat, gained one provisional
vote, and Carrao gained two, solidifying Goldbach’s win with 617 votes to best
Corrao’s final vote count of 608.
Goldbach told The Voice that he received a phone call from
Dist. 2 County Councilwoman Shirley Greene after the election offering any help
he might need to help acclimate into her council seat.
“She was very gracious in her offer, and I plan to take her
up on that. I thanked her for her service this past four years and look forward
to talking to her in depth about the county’s business,” Goldbach said.
In Dist. 4, top vote earner Carl Bell, maintained his win
over incumbent Tim Rosborough. Bell gained one provisional vote while
Roseborough gained two. The final vote count was 670 for Bell and 494 for
Roseborough.
In Dist. 6, Oren Gadson, with one provisional vote to bring
his total votes to 459, bested Sarah Bryant who received two provisional votes
for a total of 433.
Stubbs wins Dist. 17
In the Dist. 17 senate race, Winnsboro Attorney Everett
Stubbs bested incumbent Mike Fanning on Election Day with Stubbs earning 27,914
votes to Fanning’s 27,882. Late in the afternoon on Friday, after more than 100
provisional votes (cast on Election Day) were counted and verified as to their
validity in the four counties represented by Dist. 17 – Fairfield, Chester,
Lancaster, and York.
Stubbs maintained his win after that verification review
with 27 provisional votes added from York County, 12 from Fairfield County, 1
from Chester County, and 6 from Lancaster County, for a total of 27,960 votes.
Fanning added 49 provisional votes for a total of 27,931 votes.
According to Stubbs, Senator Mike Fanning called him
following the election to extend congratulations on his win. Fanning submitted
in writing a waiver of a recount, saving the election commissions in all four
counties a lot of time and money to count almost 60,000 votes.
“I called him back to say I appreciated his call, the way he
did this and for his service to the citizens in Dist. 17 for the last 8 years,”
Stubbs said.